Light Reading
Video

Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G

50%
50%
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:05 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Savill is actually speaking on  a 100g panel now,  and he wants to go on the record saying (smiling), "I wanna tell you, I am hot on 100G. I am totally with you guys [thevendors]!"

The *cost* is a different matter ....  :)

DCITDave
50%
50%
DCITDave,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:04 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


My alternate headline was: Savill thinks 100G is great but has a tough time with some of the economics given the cost of systems.


Just sayin.

PICturethis
50%
50%
PICturethis,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:03 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


...did Huawei have to pay for that ad space? 


The cost of 100G equipment is one issue, scary indeed.  However, scarier than that is the power consumption of a fully loaded 8T 100G system based on discrete components.  80x100G Transponders.  The OPEX required to the HVAC alone to cool it will be enormous, nevermind the actual consumption of the discreet components.

Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:03 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Nah, the Huawei thing is just happenstance.


Here's a behind-the-scenes peek: We editors let the video producer pick the camera angle, and we just stand where we're told.  I rarely check what's behind me, and I bet it's the same for my colleagues.


Angles are chosen mainly for variety (and for lighting and sound, of course).  Huawei did pay to have a table at our event (as did MRV) but they just happened to be in the right place, in this case.

ninjaturtle
50%
50%
ninjaturtle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:04:59 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Infinera's 100G PIC system to be announced launched in Q411' with production volumes starting 1H12' seems to be the only 100G CAPX solution available. The chip integration alone will eliminate the need for over 200 passive and active optical discrete components. New and existing customers seem to agree based on the field and lab trials that are expanding rapidly including some very large NA Tier 1 players.

laytonhasnochance
50%
50%
laytonhasnochance,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:55 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


I am not saying there is anything wrong with PIC technology. It obviously has its merits just like the technology Cien or Alcalu use. Duplication is not as easy as one may lead to believe. Going from 10G to 40G or 100G is not a walk in the park. New problems inevitably pop up.  There are many ways to reduce costs, so saying Alcalu and Ciena won't be adept at doing so, is premature and speculative compared to what you are claiming the cost and performance of PIC at 100g offers. It is obvious you are a pumper of INFN and that is fine since as you note there have been many detractors also posting. I understand that.  What do you mean re-pipe their backbone. Are not the solutions alcalu and ciena offer void of repiping You just drop the stuff in with existing fiber that may be old and flakey and there for years, and voila you just increased your throughput. Not sure what you mean by re-piping?  You seem to be suggesting INFN will be getting the bulk of 100g contracts and alcalu/ciena will be left in the dusk. That my friend seems like wishful thinking, especially when only two companies are shipping this and signing contacts today. In that high technology context, 2012 is a century away.  But you are right we will see?

ninjaturtle
50%
50%
ninjaturtle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:04:55 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G




So everything you said is not anything new. The problem is the bizarre statement you claim in my comment is no different then the numerous comments made on this very site by many predicting failure for INFN. The PIC was doomed to never be a commercially viable product and would only work in a very controlled lab environment. Not!

So after 6 plus years of shipping 10's of millions of nodes without a single field failure with the 10G systems I would not question or doubt INFN future success with 100G regardless of how many stages you claim need to be accomplished. Those stages have been accomplished before so duplicating it is simple compared to the initial accomplished of bringing out the 10G PIC itself. You see when no one has ever accomplished a technology doubt can creep into the minds and confidence of the most ambitious and talented company. However, that never happened at INFN. However to date, no one has even attempted to duplicate it or have the technical knowledge to do so now. ALU and CIEN have always and will continue to be at the mercy of the highest level of technology available from numerous discrete OEM component suppliers. They will continue to utilize the same commercially available parts everyone uses. As a result, they will not be able to control costs and bring attractive economic solutions customers need in order to jump to 100G platforms. You are already hearing that from customers now. That's because ALU and CIEN is all they can see today. No one is going balls out to re-pipe their backbone on those solutions. The beauty of the PIC integration is what differentiates INFN from everyone else in the optical industry and what will bring CAPX to the economic cross points required to convince customers to switch to 100G. 2012 is just around the corner and the 100G market has barely been sniffed out. So in time we will all see. 




laytonhasnochance
50%
50%
laytonhasnochance,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:55 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


The definition of CAPX is the process of making an investment in something at a particular time that has potential for growth down the road. More or less.  Even though the Infinera solution may be a competent solution it has not announced or released.  AlcaLu and Ciena are the only two companies actually shipping 100g product that is being used in live networks.  It is far too early to say infinera has the only 100G CAPX solution available when it has not been announced or released. Proof is in the pudding. Infinera have to announce, release and then see how it holds up in customer environments over time. That's three stages.   They are not even at Stage one yet, while the other two, are at Stage three.  How Can infinera have new and existing customers if they are only at lab, field demo and customer trial stages?  Seems kind of a bizarre statement?

ninjaturtle
50%
50%
ninjaturtle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:04:54 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


I am not a pumper of INFN. I just happen to have spent the last 15 years in the Optical industry and understand optical system technology and cost. What I mean by re-piping is "large deployments". Even though ALU and CIEN have 100G product you will agree that the amount of 100G being installed today is fractional at best. The essence of this article is that the 100G product is not economically feasible at this point in any large deployment. So as you correctly point out ALU and CIEN are the only suppliers shipping 100G product. The price points they offer (due to the discrete components that are at the mercy of using) obviously is not even close to what carriers would require to consider the switch at this time. As far as problems popping up. Sure they will and have. It may be a 100G variation of the PIC but more problems have been resolved as a result of there prior experience developing and solving 10G hurdles then any forward looking unknowns at this point in the development cycle. Based on what I have observed, INFN is an extremely conservative company. So the fact they have announced a launch date and a product GA date tells me they are pretty sure of what hurdles are ahead of them and what's needs to be done. I am sure ALU and CIEN are not looking forward to the INFN announcement. Having a product and it being cost prohibitive is not a good place to be. Driving significant costs down happen within the initial design phase of any product. Once the product is shipping the only things that will bring cost down will be volume, a redesign or material cost reductions. Unless of course they simply want to loose money when they ship product or be satisfied with low margins that will be obvious to all once quarterly earning are released. Something both ALU and CIEN have been historically good at doing for the past 10 years based on historical income statements. INFN current loses are a result of high R&D expenses that are non-recurring at todays levels in 6 months. So again we shall see.

^Eagle^
50%
50%
^Eagle^,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:54 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Your comment regards power efficiency is not accurate.  You assert that PIC's are more efficient.  While I  agree with you that PIC's pack a lot of stuff into a single optical package, I  disagree with you regards your power assertions.  


Both systems require drivers, electronics, lasers, modulators, detectors.  While I have seen nice forward progress in PIC functionality, I also am quite knowledgeable about this space, and it is absolutely not true that other approaches consume more power.


Yes, many large modules do consume more power, but those are older module designs.  Modules with best of breed discrete components are significantly more efficient.


You can argue PICs save manufacturing costs for the OEM as many functions are inside one co-packaged module.  


But a significant savings in power?  No.


sailboat

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
From The Founder
Last week I dropped in on "Hotlanta," Georgia to moderate Light Reading's inaugural DroneComm conference – a unique colloquium investigating the potential for drone communications to disrupt the world's telecom ecosystem. As you will see, it was a day of exploration and epiphany...
LRTV Documentaries
Cable Eyeing SDN for Headend, Home Uses

5|26|15   |   05:57   |   (1) comment


CableLabs is looking at virtualizing CMTS and CCAP devices in the headend, as well as in-home devices, says CableLabs' Karthik Sundaresan.
LRTV Documentaries
Verizon's Emmons: SDN Key to Cost-Effective Scaling

5|22|15   |   03:53   |   (0) comments


For Verizon and other network operators to ramp up available bandwidth cost effectively, they need to move to SDN and agree on how to do that.
LRTV Documentaries
Lack of Universal SDN a Challenge

5|21|15   |   04:51   |   (3) comments


Heavy Reading Analyst Sterling Perrin talks about how uncertainty about SDN standards and approaches may be slowing deployment.
LRTV Custom TV
Steve Vogelsang Interview: Carrier SDN

5|20|15   |   05:02   |   (0) comments


Sterling Perrin speaks to Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, about the new Carrier SDN-enabling Network Services Platform and the operator challenges it solves.
LRTV Custom TV
Carrier SDN: On-Demand Networks for an On-Demand World

5|20|15   |   20:52   |   (0) comments


Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, talks about requirements and benefits of Carrier SDN during the keynote address at the Light Reading Carrier SDN event May 2015.
LRTV Documentaries
The Security Challenge of SDN

5|19|15   |   02:52   |   (0) comments


CenturyLink VP James Feger discusses concerns that virtualization could create new vulnerabilities unless network operators build in safeguards.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Elasticity – Highly Available VNF Scale-Out Architectures for the Mobile Edge

5|18|15   |   5:50   |   (0) comments


Peter Marek and Paul Stevens from Advantech Networks and Communications Group talk about their NFV Elasticity initiative and the company's latest platforms for deploying virtual network functions at the edge of the network. Packetarium XL and the new Versatile Server Module: 'designed to reach parts of the network that other servers cannot reach.'
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Bay Area Spark Meetup 2015

5|14|15   |   3:54   |   (0) comments


Developed in 2009, Apache Spark is a powerful open source processing engine built around speed, ease of use and sophisticated analytics. This spring, Huawei hosted a meetup for Spark developers and data scientists in Santa Clara, California. Light Reading spoke with organizers and attendees about Huawei's code contributions and long-term commitment to Spark.
LRTV Custom TV
The Transport SDN Buzz

5|12|15   |   06:01   |   (1) comment


Sterling Perrin, senior analyst at Heavy Reading, speaks with Peter Ashwood-Smith of Huawei and Guru Parulkar of ON.Lab about the evolution of transport SDN and the integration of technologies.
LRTV Custom TV
Next-Generation CCAP: Cisco cBR-8 Evolved CCAP

5|5|15   |   04:49   |   (0) comments


John Chapman, Cisco's CTO of Cable Access Business Unit and Cisco Fellow, explained the innovation design of Cisco's cBR-8, the industry's first Evolved CCAP, including DOCSIS 3.1 design from ground-up, distributed CCAP with Remote PHY and path to virtualization. Cisco's cBR-8 Evolved CCAP is the platform that will last through the transitions.
LRTV Custom TV
Meeting the Demands of Bandwidth & Service Group Growth

5|1|15   |   5:35   |   (0) comments


Jorge Salinger, Comcast's Vice President of Access Architecture, explains how DOCSIS 3.1 and multi-service CCAP can meet the demands of the bandwidth and service group growth.
LRTV Custom TV
DOCSIS 3.1: Transforming Cable From Hardware-Defined Network to Software-Defined Network

4|29|15   |   03:48   |   (0) comments


John Chapman, Cisco's CTO of Cable Access Business Unit and Cisco Fellow, explains how DOCSIS 3.1 can transform cable HFC network to a more agile software-defined network.
Upcoming Live Events
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 10, 2015, Chicago, IL
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
October 6, 2015, The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
October 6, 2015, Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Procera has gathered facts, stats and customer experience feedback from a survey of 540 users from across the globe.
Hot Topics
10 Alternate Uses for Tablets
Eryn Leavens, Copy Desk Editor, 5/22/2015
Bidding War for TWC Looks Likelier
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 5/22/2015
Charter Seals Deals for TWC, Bright House
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/26/2015
Eurobites: Alcatel-Lucent Trials 400G in Czech Republic
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 5/26/2015
Comcast Targets 6 New Gigabit Markets
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/21/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
On May 29th 10 AM ET, Steve Saunders, founder and CEO of Light Reading, will be drilling into the "pains and gains" of NFV with Saar Gillai, SVP & GM for NFV at Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ) (HP). He has defined a four-step NFV model describing a sequence of technology innovation. It's a must-read doc for any network architect looking to get to grips with their NFV migration strategy. Join us for the interview, and the chance to ask Saar your NFV questions directly!
With 200 customers in 60 countries, Stockholm-based Net Insight has carved out a solid leadership position in one of the hottest vertical markets going in comms right now: helping service providers and broadcasters deliver video and other multimedia traffic over IP networks. How has Net Insight managed to achieve this success in the face of immense competition from the industry giants?
My ongoing interview tour of the leading minds of the telecom industry recently took me to Richardson, Texas, where I met with Rod Naphan, CTO and SVP, Solutions, ...
Cats with Phones
Too Fluffy to Talk Click Here
Elmer found that his bountiful fur got in the way of meaningful conversation.