Light Reading
Level 3's Paul Savill talks about the carrier's struggle with the economics of 100G and provides a network update for his metro customers
Video

Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G

50%
50%
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:05 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Savill is actually speaking on  a 100g panel now,  and he wants to go on the record saying (smiling), "I wanna tell you, I am hot on 100G. I am totally with you guys [thevendors]!"

The *cost* is a different matter ....  :)

DCITDave
50%
50%
DCITDave,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:04 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


My alternate headline was: Savill thinks 100G is great but has a tough time with some of the economics given the cost of systems.


Just sayin.

PICturethis
50%
50%
PICturethis,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:03 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


...did Huawei have to pay for that ad space? 


The cost of 100G equipment is one issue, scary indeed.  However, scarier than that is the power consumption of a fully loaded 8T 100G system based on discrete components.  80x100G Transponders.  The OPEX required to the HVAC alone to cool it will be enormous, nevermind the actual consumption of the discreet components.

Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:05:03 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Nah, the Huawei thing is just happenstance.


Here's a behind-the-scenes peek: We editors let the video producer pick the camera angle, and we just stand where we're told.  I rarely check what's behind me, and I bet it's the same for my colleagues.


Angles are chosen mainly for variety (and for lighting and sound, of course).  Huawei did pay to have a table at our event (as did MRV) but they just happened to be in the right place, in this case.

ninjaturtle
50%
50%
ninjaturtle,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:59 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Infinera's 100G PIC system to be announced launched in Q411' with production volumes starting 1H12' seems to be the only 100G CAPX solution available. The chip integration alone will eliminate the need for over 200 passive and active optical discrete components. New and existing customers seem to agree based on the field and lab trials that are expanding rapidly including some very large NA Tier 1 players.

laytonhasnochance
50%
50%
laytonhasnochance,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:55 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


I am not saying there is anything wrong with PIC technology. It obviously has its merits just like the technology Cien or Alcalu use. Duplication is not as easy as one may lead to believe. Going from 10G to 40G or 100G is not a walk in the park. New problems inevitably pop up.  There are many ways to reduce costs, so saying Alcalu and Ciena won't be adept at doing so, is premature and speculative compared to what you are claiming the cost and performance of PIC at 100g offers. It is obvious you are a pumper of INFN and that is fine since as you note there have been many detractors also posting. I understand that.  What do you mean re-pipe their backbone. Are not the solutions alcalu and ciena offer void of repiping You just drop the stuff in with existing fiber that may be old and flakey and there for years, and voila you just increased your throughput. Not sure what you mean by re-piping?  You seem to be suggesting INFN will be getting the bulk of 100g contracts and alcalu/ciena will be left in the dusk. That my friend seems like wishful thinking, especially when only two companies are shipping this and signing contacts today. In that high technology context, 2012 is a century away.  But you are right we will see?

ninjaturtle
50%
50%
ninjaturtle,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:55 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G




So everything you said is not anything new. The problem is the bizarre statement you claim in my comment is no different then the numerous comments made on this very site by many predicting failure for INFN. The PIC was doomed to never be a commercially viable product and would only work in a very controlled lab environment. Not!

So after 6 plus years of shipping 10's of millions of nodes without a single field failure with the 10G systems I would not question or doubt INFN future success with 100G regardless of how many stages you claim need to be accomplished. Those stages have been accomplished before so duplicating it is simple compared to the initial accomplished of bringing out the 10G PIC itself. You see when no one has ever accomplished a technology doubt can creep into the minds and confidence of the most ambitious and talented company. However, that never happened at INFN. However to date, no one has even attempted to duplicate it or have the technical knowledge to do so now. ALU and CIEN have always and will continue to be at the mercy of the highest level of technology available from numerous discrete OEM component suppliers. They will continue to utilize the same commercially available parts everyone uses. As a result, they will not be able to control costs and bring attractive economic solutions customers need in order to jump to 100G platforms. You are already hearing that from customers now. That's because ALU and CIEN is all they can see today. No one is going balls out to re-pipe their backbone on those solutions. The beauty of the PIC integration is what differentiates INFN from everyone else in the optical industry and what will bring CAPX to the economic cross points required to convince customers to switch to 100G. 2012 is just around the corner and the 100G market has barely been sniffed out. So in time we will all see. 




laytonhasnochance
50%
50%
laytonhasnochance,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:55 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


The definition of CAPX is the process of making an investment in something at a particular time that has potential for growth down the road. More or less.  Even though the Infinera solution may be a competent solution it has not announced or released.  AlcaLu and Ciena are the only two companies actually shipping 100g product that is being used in live networks.  It is far too early to say infinera has the only 100G CAPX solution available when it has not been announced or released. Proof is in the pudding. Infinera have to announce, release and then see how it holds up in customer environments over time. That's three stages.   They are not even at Stage one yet, while the other two, are at Stage three.  How Can infinera have new and existing customers if they are only at lab, field demo and customer trial stages?  Seems kind of a bizarre statement?

ninjaturtle
50%
50%
ninjaturtle,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:54 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


I am not a pumper of INFN. I just happen to have spent the last 15 years in the Optical industry and understand optical system technology and cost. What I mean by re-piping is "large deployments". Even though ALU and CIEN have 100G product you will agree that the amount of 100G being installed today is fractional at best. The essence of this article is that the 100G product is not economically feasible at this point in any large deployment. So as you correctly point out ALU and CIEN are the only suppliers shipping 100G product. The price points they offer (due to the discrete components that are at the mercy of using) obviously is not even close to what carriers would require to consider the switch at this time. As far as problems popping up. Sure they will and have. It may be a 100G variation of the PIC but more problems have been resolved as a result of there prior experience developing and solving 10G hurdles then any forward looking unknowns at this point in the development cycle. Based on what I have observed, INFN is an extremely conservative company. So the fact they have announced a launch date and a product GA date tells me they are pretty sure of what hurdles are ahead of them and what's needs to be done. I am sure ALU and CIEN are not looking forward to the INFN announcement. Having a product and it being cost prohibitive is not a good place to be. Driving significant costs down happen within the initial design phase of any product. Once the product is shipping the only things that will bring cost down will be volume, a redesign or material cost reductions. Unless of course they simply want to loose money when they ship product or be satisfied with low margins that will be obvious to all once quarterly earning are released. Something both ALU and CIEN have been historically good at doing for the past 10 years based on historical income statements. INFN current loses are a result of high R&D expenses that are non-recurring at todays levels in 6 months. So again we shall see.

^Eagle^
50%
50%
^Eagle^,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:04:54 PM
re: Level 3's Paul Savill: Not Hot on the Cost of 100G


Your comment regards power efficiency is not accurate.  You assert that PIC's are more efficient.  While I  agree with you that PIC's pack a lot of stuff into a single optical package, I  disagree with you regards your power assertions.  


Both systems require drivers, electronics, lasers, modulators, detectors.  While I have seen nice forward progress in PIC functionality, I also am quite knowledgeable about this space, and it is absolutely not true that other approaches consume more power.


Yes, many large modules do consume more power, but those are older module designs.  Modules with best of breed discrete components are significantly more efficient.


You can argue PICs save manufacturing costs for the OEM as many functions are inside one co-packaged module.  


But a significant savings in power?  No.


sailboat

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
LRTV Custom TV
Driving the Network Transformation

7|23|14   |   4:29   |   (0) comments


Intel's Sandra Rivera discusses network transformation and how Intel technologies, programs, and standards body efforts have helped the industry migration to SDN and NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
Distributed NFV-Based Business Services by RAD

7|18|14   |   5:38   |   (0) comments


With the ETSI-approved Distributed NFV PoC running in the background, RAD's CEO, Dror Bin, talks about why D-NFV makes compelling sense for service providers, and about the dollars and cents RAD is putting behind D-NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
MRV Accelerating Packet Optical Convergence

7|15|14   |   6:06   |   (0) comments


Giving you network insight to make your network smarter.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV-Enabled Ethernet for Generating New Revenues

7|15|14   |   5:49   |   (0) comments


Cyan's Planet Orchestrate allows service providers and their end-customers to activate software-based capabilities such as firewalls and encryption on top of existing Ethernet services in just minutes.
LRTV Custom TV
Symkloud NVF-Ready Video Transcoding, Big Data

7|9|14   |   3:41   |   (0) comments


Kontron and ISV partner Vantrix demonstrate high-performance video transcoding and data analytic solutions on same 2U standard platform that is ready for SDN and NFV deployments made by mobile, cable and cloud operators.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Evolving Role of Hybrid Video for Competitive Success

7|4|14   |   4:09   |   (0) comments


At Huawei's Global Analysts Summit in Shenzhen, China, Steven C. Hawley from TV Strategies speaks to us about the evolving role of hybrid video for competitive success.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
How CSPs Leverage Big Data in the Digital Economy

7|4|14   |   4:48   |   (2) comments


Justin van der Lande from Analysys Mason shares with us his views on how telecom operators can leverage customer asset monetization with big data. His discusses the current status of big data applications and the challenges and opportunities for telecom operators in the digital economy era.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Accelerator for Digital Business Future Oriented BSS

7|4|14   |   3:08   |   (0) comments


Mobile and internet are becoming intertwined; IT and CT are integrating; and leading CSPs have begun to transform to information service and entertainment providers. How should the BSS system evolve to enable this transformation? Karl Whitelock, an analyst at Frost & Sullivan, shares his views.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Orange Tunisia Discusses Multi-Band Antenna With EasyRET Solution

7|4|14   |   2:45   |   (0) comments


As new site acquisition becomes more difficult, Orange Tunisia has requested multi-band antenna to support UMTS and LTE innovation. Some things considered include reducing the cost of antenna maintenance and having high reliability antenna and EasyRET solution.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
How Telefonica Spain Considers Antenna Selection for LTE Network Deployment

7|4|14   |   2:19   |   (0) comments


Tony Conlan, Global CTO of RAN, Telefonica, shares his opinion on antennas in LTE network deployment: Tower space is the premier requirement on antennas; reliability is important to reduce OPEX; and EasyRET solution will be helpful for antenna maintenance.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
dtac Thailand: Multi-band Antenna & Capacity Solution for a Better MBB Experience

7|3|14   |   3:45   |   (0) comments


With the development of LTE, tower space and load are limited for new antenna, but users' capacity requirements are growing fast. To provide a better MBB experience, Panya Vechbanyongratana from dtac Thailand shared his experiences and antenna requirements.
LRTV Documentaries
BTE Panel: Network of the Future

7|2|14   |   1:00:57   |   (0) comments


Full-length video of the ATIS Panel Discussion: 'How Far Away Is the Network of the Future & What Does It Look Like?' from the Big Telecom Event (BTE) in Chicago.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
Allot's latest MobileTrends Charging Report shows that value-based pricing plans are up from 35% in 2011 to 85% in 2014.
Today's Cartoon
Vacation Special Caption Competition Click Here
Latest Comment
Hot Topics
Microsoft to Axe 12,500 Ex-Nokia Employees
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 7/17/2014
The Municipal Menace?
Jason Meyers, Senior Editor, Utility Communications/IoT, 7/22/2014
GM: 10 Car Models on Road With AT&T's LTE
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 7/18/2014
Apple Earnings: Strong iPhone Sales, iPad Sales Slump, $7.8B Profit
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 7/22/2014
Cisco Puts a Fog Over IoT
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 7/23/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed