& cplSiteName &

Judge to Blackberry Users: Drop Dead

The Martin Chronicles
The Martin Chronicles
The Martin Chronicles
2/3/2006
50%
50%

5:20 PM -- I've never been in Judge James R. Spencer's courtroom, and I hope I never will be.

Don't get me wrong: Judge Spencer is a distinguished jurist, a cum laude graduate of Harvard, first in his class at Howard University's divinity school, and the first African-American judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He worked in the civil rights movement in the late 1960s, and I have no doubt that his principles match his brilliance.

But Judge Spencer has got it wrong in the BlackBerry case. I'm not talking about the merits of NTP's patent infringement suit; I'm talking about Spencer's stubborn refusal to take into account the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's moves to invalidate NTP's patents. This week the Patent Office issued a preliminary ruling that struck down the fifth and final patent at issue in the NTP-RIM lawsuit. NTP will appeal that ruling; a final decision could come in the next 60 days -- or it could take years. (See Final NTP Patent Struck Down.)

Judge Spencer won't wait. He's repeatedly made it clear he has no intention of letting the slow grinding of the Patent Office's machinery affect his ruling re: RIM. "Frankly, it's highly unlikely that I'm going to stay these proceedings," Spencer said from the bench back in November. "I don't run [the Patent Office's] business and they don't run mine."

Well, nobody's trying to restrict your judicial independence, Judge Spencer, but the outcome of the RIM case is not just "your business" -- it's the business of millions of Blackberry users, too, who use the devices every day to keep the wheels of American commerce spinning. RIM may very well have based its business on second-hand technology; it certainly wouldn't be the first successful tech company to do so. But if the Patent Office strikes down NTP's patents, as appears likely, there's no case here. Maybe it's worth waiting a while longer to find that out.

If Judge Spencer's impatience prevails, though, Crackberry addicts can refer to this handy guide to how to deal if the worst-case scenario happens.

— Richard Martin, Senior Editor, Unstrung

(4)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
daniel.taylor
50%
50%
daniel.taylor,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:07:19 AM
re: Judge to Blackberry Users: Drop Dead
Mr. Martin is making an assertion not supported by the facts at hand when he discusses "...Spencer's stubborn refusal to take into account the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's moves to invalidate NTP's patents." The Court's November 30 decision is devoted entirely to the prospect of a PTO decision and appeals process.

That decision is available on Pacer. It's Document #423 for Case 3:01-cv-00767-JRS in the U.S. District Court of Eastern Virginia. Like NTP's 960 patent, it's a worthwhile read for anyone interested in the outcome of this case.
mwatson1111
50%
50%
mwatson1111,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:07:10 AM
re: Judge to Blackberry Users: Drop Dead
While I compliment Mr. Martin on his ability to write, his argument is extremely flawed. He is suggesting that RIM be rewarded for violating patents simply because there are a lot of customers and "maybe" some of the patents will be invalidated. So if I want to steal IP and make money, it's OK as long as I get lots of customers before someone finds out that I have violated the IP? After all, we don't want to upset customers? If there is someone you want to criticize, it should be RIM, not the judge. If you or RIM were really concerned about Blackberry customers, then start an editorial campaign aimed at having RIM settle with NTP. Or start an editorial campaign aimed at IP squatting scum (which is not-so-subtly inferred in your article). Why should the known violator be rewarded based soley on a presumption of public interest and the hope that their defensive campaign of patent invalidation will work? More importantly, why should a judge be criticized for doing his job and not becoming a 'consumer activist' judge. Let us all hope that you never have any influence over our patent office or judiciary.
RBMartin
50%
50%
RBMartin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:06:52 AM
re: Judge to Blackberry Users: Drop Dead
Actually I think you've mischaracterized my argument. As I said, RIM may well have violated NTP's patents; if those patents are invalidated, though, there's no intellectual property to infringe upon, is there? This seems self-evident. I entirely agree with your larger points -- that RIM should settle, and that the patent system needs reforming.

....and thanks for the compliment.
mwatson1111
50%
50%
mwatson1111,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:06:37 AM
re: Judge to Blackberry Users: Drop Dead
I'm sorry if I mischaracterized your argument. I understand that the patents may become invalidated. Personally, I have equal distain for IP violators as I do squatters. I also understand that in a perfect world that patent validation and infringement judgements shouldn't be decoupled. Unfortunately, they are. My point was that given the current state of our legal system and this particular case, the victim should be given the benefit of doubt while the peripheral cases are being resolved, not the other way around as you suggest. That's all I meant.

...and you're most welcome.
More Blogs from The Martin Chronicles
Is this where Apple got its 'Multi-Touch' UI idea?
Former Qwest CEO set to stand trial starting March 19
Muni network controversy pales next to the mayor's private scandals
Billionaire might force a Moto showdown
One can't help but chortle
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
October 18, 2017, Colorado Convention Center - Denver, CO
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue London
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 16, 2017, ExCel Centre, London
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Is US Lurching Back to Monopoly Status?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Pai's FCC Raises Alarms at Competitive Carriers
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
The Big Cable DAA Update
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 10/11/2017
Telecom Italia Covers 73% of Italy With NB-IoT
Iain Morris, News Editor, 10/13/2017
Tribalism Is Rife in Telecom, Too
Iain Morris, News Editor, 10/13/2017
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed