Light Reading
There's been a significant switch at the top of the telcos' list of priorities - monetizing networks has edged building networks from the top of the pile.

The Big Telecom Switch

Stephen Saunders
7/9/2014
50%
50%

It's been about six months since I re-acquired Light Reading from our insect overlords at the end of 2013. (See Stephen Saunders Acquires Light Reading From UBM.)

I was expecting to be crazily busy in the post-purchase phase (expectation met!), but what I wasn't prepared for was just how much our industry had changed while I was away. (For those unfamiliar with my "backstory," I took six years off from telecom from 2007 to 2013, either running an integrated marketing agency or serving hard time for criminal negligence, depending on your choice of grapevine.)

Coming back was a bit like being cryogenically frozen -- Han Solo-style -- and then being thawed out and finding that just about everything you thought you knew about telecom had changed.

To help me get an up-to-date handle on what's happening today, and to avoid making a giant ass of myself in front of my old/new Light Reading employees, I undertook what all new CEOs are supposed to do -- a series of 100 customer meetings in my first 100 days back "in office."

These meetings were mostly with C-level and Senior VP level execs, at both service providers and equipment manufacturers, and under NDA, a condition that probably provided me with a more accurate indication of what the industry really thinks than the paid marketing messages now competing for your attention in the html pages of industry websites.

So what did I learn on my journey through the telecom industry?

By far the biggest change evident since I left is the shift in priorities amongst Light Reading's service provider audience.

In 2007, network operators were still entrenched in the business of building high-capacity networks and making sure they were reliable. And that work continues, of course, every day. But today's service providers now face a new challenge -- monetizing all that capacity, and doing so in a way that both maintains acceptable levels of profitability while differentiating them from a slew of competitors, old and new.

In fact, it seems to me that it might be time to revisit and update our old friend the OSI model by adding an extra layer -- Layer 8, or the Money Layer, as shown below in a slide from my keynote presentation at the recent Big Telecom Event. Because that's really where the focus of the industry is right now: this segue from building the network to monetizing the network.

(Note: It's apparent that as the industry's interest moves up into the higher layers of the model and beyond, so the level of interest in lower OSI Layers such as 1 (optical), 2 (switching), and 3 (routing) is decreasing. If not actually commoditized, there is certainly far less to talk about or debate in areas such as carrier class Ethernet or IP routing than there was 10 years ago, something which raises all sorts of questions about the future role and relevance of organizations such as the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) .

The most obvious effect of the monetization trend is the way it is now driving the world's telecom providers to undertake a dramatic business transformation process that is manifesting itself in a number of different ways: mobile operators looking to compete with terrestrial operators; cable operators looking to move into the mobile market; OTT operators buying fiber assets; and Tier 1 operators trying to beat the newcomers at their own game.

Factor in new players such as municipal and county governments, broadcasters, and utilities, and things get really interesting. (Obviously, these are all sectors that both Light Reading and Heavy Reading will be covering intensively during the next year, so stay tuned for lots more on all of these markets).

So that's the big picture. But within that superset there were a number of noteworthy technology trends that kept recurring in my meetings earlier this year.

The most notable, by far, relates to SDN and NFV. This is obviously the story of the year -- maybe the decade. And it's clear that of the two, SDN has so far swallowed the majority of marketing budgets and publicity. (Why, some people are even naming their industry publications after SDN!)

But behind the scenes it's NFV, not SDN, that dominates the conversation and the excitement.

Why? Because NFV is what service providers have decided they want, and need, right now. And that is a unique and unprecedented occurrence in the history of the telecom industry. For the first time, we are seeing the top technologists in the service provider community get out in front of the vendors and set a new direction (and, it must be said, catching some of the incumbent equipment manufacturers on the hop).

So what on earth is going on with SDN? Is it possible that our entire industry has just gotten it wrong on this tech?

It's happened before, after all, as those of you (like me) that are old enough to remember the battle between ATM and IP in the late 1980s will recall. Back then pretty much the entire trade press backed asynchronous transfer mode to wipe IP and Fiber Channel off the network. Thirty years later and, well, you know how that worked out.

But that kind of catastrophic error of analysis isn't what is happening here, I think. There's no question that 21st century telecom networks must be automated and virtualized, but the reality is that defining SDN and implementing it in wide area commercial communications networks is non-trivial.

Regardless of what industry pundits think, the process will take years -- probably a decade, in fact.

What type of SDN will emerge at the end of that time? Forget about any SDN solution that requires service providers to rip and replace boxes to obtain benefits. That's not going to happen.

Overlay solutions offer advantages, but isn't SDN supposed to be about simplification and consolidation?

As has happened many times before, it's likely that a hybrid will emerge, with networks that are more programmable than they are today but still recognizable as wide area communications systems.

What's intriguing -- and where companies stand to win or lose an awful lot of money -- is working out how our industry will get from where we are now to that new architecture. And in the meantime, NFV offers immediate benefits.

So those were the biggest findings of my tour of telecom during the first quarter of this year. Do you agree with them? Please let me know on the message board below.

— Stephen Saunders, Founder and CEO, Light Reading

(12)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/17/2014 | 3:35:41 PM
Re: Ironically
I'd agree with that Mitch. 
FakeMitchWagner
50%
50%
FakeMitchWagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/17/2014 | 2:29:57 PM
Re: Ironically
Steve - In addition to the companies you name, I cite HP.
Infostack
50%
50%
Infostack,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/11/2014 | 3:16:14 PM
Value Based Pricing
Steve,

Firstly, the epic protocol battles you referred to occurred in the mid to late 1990s.   Data was a relative pimple on the elephant's butt in 1990 and few even knew of IP.  This is important in terms of understanding the interplay between voice and data and how FCC policy intentionally and unintentionally resulted in "the internet" and why the concept of net neutrality is both fiction and farce.

Secondly, your layer 8 supports the "old school" of network economics in which value was based on cost.  The "new school" developed over the past 30 years has priced based on value.  I call it marrying the communications session to the commercial/economic transaction.  Settlements should be occurring at every layer and boundary given the extreme range of (marginal) demand and nearly infinite upside.

The distinction is significant in terms of how we look at and understand convergence of supply and divergence of demand, and new business models defined by:

Core vs edge

Digital vs analog

Horizontal vs vertical

Geometric vs linear

Marginal vs average cost

Until the carriers (edge access providers) realize this fundamental shift that began when we undertook a vertical/logical separation of the Monopoly 30 years ago they will continue to fall behind by 20-30% annually in terms of their ability to monetize their capex and opex based on value-based pricing.  The old silos have dissappeared (or will do so quickly) and they are all at the edge of the global core. 

The debate we should be having needs to be less about supply and more about demand stimulated by 4K VoD, seamless mobile BB, 2-way HD video collaboration, and the IoT.  These 4 trends represent a compression of all the change over the past 30 years into the next 10.  In other words, it is enormous.  As I've said elsewhere in comment fields on this site, the current discussions about where the carriers are reminds me of the parable where the "Emperor Has No Clothes".

BTW, the single biggest thing that has impacted the market since you left in 2007 was layer 2 offload in the smartphone foisted on AT&T by Steve Jobs.  Just think about that along the lines of what I said above and the importance of translating that to current policy debates on interconnection, settlements, and net neutrality.

Michael
nasimson
50%
50%
nasimson,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/10/2014 | 11:06:12 PM
welcome back
Steven you are back. And you are back with a bang. And you have hit the nail on its head. If this portal can crack the 8th OSI layer, you have lot of people like me as your permanent customers.
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 8:06:30 PM
Re: Ironically
Mitch - which vendors are getting itright with balancing NFV and SDN in the portfolios? 

For me, Brocade and RAD have the most well thought out strategies, followed by ALU.

Who are your winners here? 

 
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 8:03:14 PM
Re: Publication names
Hi Craig! 

I only included the joke because I knew you'd take it in good spirit! 

:)))

 

 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 5:32:32 PM
Re: Publication names
Yes, and it's something that will pass the test of time with flying colors.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 5:29:45 PM
Re: Publication names
Dennis,

I still think the best product name is...."Free Beer".  Who doesn't want to have Free Beer?

The ads, the marketing, all of it writes itself.

seven

 
FakeMitchWagner
100%
0%
FakeMitchWagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/9/2014 | 5:20:31 PM
Ironically
Ironically, NFV has a business advantage because the benefits are smaller. 

SDN promises to generate hundreds of millions of dollars in savings and additional revenue -- but first you have to rearchitect the entire network. Tell that to the CEO, and he says, great, let's form a committee to write a report to set up a working group to study the opportunity. 

Whereas with NFV, you might generate a much smaller savings and additional revenue. But it also requires a much smaller investment. You don't even have to go to the CEO to present the opportunity. You can go to him when you've generated results. Then iterate on a larger scale.  

NFV scales up much easier than SDN scales up. 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 2:54:36 PM
Re: Publication names
Yeah -- everybody knows the real money is in creating a unique and distinctive brand -- like GigaMats or something.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Educational Resources
sponsor supplied content
Educational Resources Archive
More Blogs from Column
Open is possible, definable and important, because an environment of freedom is a superior construct.
Every component of the smart home ecosystem is changing, creating new opportunities – and challenges – for service providers.
Don't let new technologies and whizz-bang gadgets keep you from respecting those speaking to you and giving them the full attention they deserve.
Defining SDN realistically will help carriers cut through the hype, says Sunil Khandekar, CEO of Alcatel-Lucent's Nuage Networks.
They can go from also-rans to leaders -- if they don't mess up.
Flash Poll
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Inaugural Optical Innovation Forum in Nice

9|2|14   |     |   (0) comments


More than 170 attendees from network operators, service providers, analyst firms, and component companies from around the world convened in Nice in June for the inaugural Optical Innovation Forum, co-produced by Huawei and Light Reading.
Wagner’s Ring
Data Centers Drive Telcos Into the Future

8|28|14   |   2:20   |   (2) comments


Data centers are at the heart of key trends driving telecom -- network virtualization, the drive for increased agility, and the need to compete with OTT providers.
LRTV Custom TV
Why SPs Should Consider Cisco's EPN

8|27|14   |   5:40   |   (0) comments


Sultan Dawood from Cisco discusses Cisco's EPN, which enables SPs to build agile and programmable networks delivering new network virtualized services using Cisco's Evolved Services Platform (ESP).
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei’s Showcase @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   2.56   |   (0) comments


SoftCOM is Huawei's framework for telecom business and network transformation. Haofei Liu, Solution Marketing Manager, Carrier Business Group, Huawei, showcases Huawei's SoftCOM architecture in this video.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of Integrated Solutions on SoftCOM & NFV Monetization

8|26|14   |   4.43   |   (0) comments


Libin Dai, Director of Integrated Solutions, Carrier Business Group, discusses Huawei's SoftCOM and NFV monetization. Huawei believes that NFV monetization should be service-driven rather than network-driven, and that operators should have network transformation, service transformation and a compatible and collaborative ecosystem in place in order to deploy NFV.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of US NFV Lab on CloudEdge & the Future of NFV

8|26|14   |   4.06   |   (0) comments


Sean Chen, Director of US NFV Lab at Huawei, discusses Huawei's new approach to NFV in open collaboration. Huawei believes that through Proof of Concept tests, it could help operators learn and communicate with the industry more effectively. Sean believes that successful implementation of NFV should have its values reaching to end users and discusses how Huawei's ...
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Highlights @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   3.34   |   (0) comments


At the Big Telecom Event in Chicago Huawei showcases its high-level strategy, the SoftCOM architecture, which helps operators reduce the cost of ownership of their network infrastructure and generate additional revenue in the ICT service environment. Huawei showcases over 30 pilot programs from across the globe, focusing on the industry-leading commercial ...
LRTV Custom TV
VeEX – Live from the Show

8|21|14   |   5:58   |   (0) comments


An overview of VeEX Test and Measurement solutions including TX300S multi-service test set with VeExpress cloud-based management system, UX400 universal modular platform supporting 100G testing, and the redesigned RXT modular platform.
LRTV Custom TV
Transitioning CE 2.0 Networks Into the SDN & NFV Era With Telco Systems

8|19|14   |   5:19   |   (0) comments


Telco Systems' Ariel Efrati (CEO) and Moshe Shimon (VP of Product Management) discuss virtualization and how the company's new Open Metro Edge solution utilizes the SDN and NFV concepts to accelerate and orchestrate service delivery through its innovative product portfolio and software applications.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Myths: Is NFV Still Several Years Away?

8|11|14   |   1:13   |   (0) comments


Some say that NFV (network functions virtualization) is still several years away from being implemented on mobile operator networks. This isn't the case. Operators can get started on their paths to NFV now, as this short video from Skyfire shows.
LRTV Custom TV
A New Security Paradigm in SDN/NFV

7|28|14   |   02:54   |   (0) comments


Paul Shaneck, Global Director Network Solutions for Symantec, discusses the evolving virtualized network, explaining how Symantec is leading the security discussion as it relates to SDN and NFV, and helping to ensure the network is protected and compliant.
LRTV Documentaries
Sprint's Network Evolution

7|24|14   |   14:59   |   (0) comments


Sprint's Jay Bluhm gives a keynote speech at the Big Telecom Event (BTE) about Sprint's network and services evolution strategy, including Spark.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 23, 2014, Denver, CO
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 2, 2014, New York City
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
A survey conducted by Vasona Networks suggests that 72% of mobile users expect good performance all the time, and they'll blame the network operator when it's not up to par.
Today's Cartoon
Hot Topics
Nokia's Maps Land on Samsung Devices
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 8/29/2014
Now Google Planning Drones-to-Go
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 8/29/2014
Music to My Mobile
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 8/28/2014
Be Open to the Freedom of Openness
Kelly Herrell, 8/29/2014
Netflix to FCC: Kill Comcast-TWC Deal
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 8/28/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed