Light Reading

The Big Telecom Switch

Steve Saunders
7/9/2014
50%
50%

It's been about six months since I re-acquired Light Reading from our insect overlords at the end of 2013. (See Stephen Saunders Acquires Light Reading From UBM.)

I was expecting to be crazily busy in the post-purchase phase (expectation met!), but what I wasn't prepared for was just how much our industry had changed while I was away. (For those unfamiliar with my "backstory," I took six years off from telecom from 2007 to 2013, either running an integrated marketing agency or serving hard time for criminal negligence, depending on your choice of grapevine.)

Coming back was a bit like being cryogenically frozen -- Han Solo-style -- and then being thawed out and finding that just about everything you thought you knew about telecom had changed.

To help me get an up-to-date handle on what's happening today, and to avoid making a giant ass of myself in front of my old/new Light Reading employees, I undertook what all new CEOs are supposed to do -- a series of 100 customer meetings in my first 100 days back "in office."

These meetings were mostly with C-level and Senior VP level execs, at both service providers and equipment manufacturers, and under NDA, a condition that probably provided me with a more accurate indication of what the industry really thinks than the paid marketing messages now competing for your attention in the html pages of industry websites.

So what did I learn on my journey through the telecom industry?

By far the biggest change evident since I left is the shift in priorities amongst Light Reading's service provider audience.

In 2007, network operators were still entrenched in the business of building high-capacity networks and making sure they were reliable. And that work continues, of course, every day. But today's service providers now face a new challenge -- monetizing all that capacity, and doing so in a way that both maintains acceptable levels of profitability while differentiating them from a slew of competitors, old and new.

In fact, it seems to me that it might be time to revisit and update our old friend the OSI model by adding an extra layer -- Layer 8, or the Money Layer, as shown below in a slide from my keynote presentation at the recent Big Telecom Event. Because that's really where the focus of the industry is right now: this segue from building the network to monetizing the network.

(Note: It's apparent that as the industry's interest moves up into the higher layers of the model and beyond, so the level of interest in lower OSI Layers such as 1 (optical), 2 (switching), and 3 (routing) is decreasing. If not actually commoditized, there is certainly far less to talk about or debate in areas such as carrier class Ethernet or IP routing than there was 10 years ago, something which raises all sorts of questions about the future role and relevance of organizations such as the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) .

The most obvious effect of the monetization trend is the way it is now driving the world's telecom providers to undertake a dramatic business transformation process that is manifesting itself in a number of different ways: mobile operators looking to compete with terrestrial operators; cable operators looking to move into the mobile market; OTT operators buying fiber assets; and Tier 1 operators trying to beat the newcomers at their own game.

Factor in new players such as municipal and county governments, broadcasters, and utilities, and things get really interesting. (Obviously, these are all sectors that both Light Reading and Heavy Reading will be covering intensively during the next year, so stay tuned for lots more on all of these markets).

So that's the big picture. But within that superset there were a number of noteworthy technology trends that kept recurring in my meetings earlier this year.

The most notable, by far, relates to SDN and NFV. This is obviously the story of the year -- maybe the decade. And it's clear that of the two, SDN has so far swallowed the majority of marketing budgets and publicity. (Why, some people are even naming their industry publications after SDN!)

But behind the scenes it's NFV, not SDN, that dominates the conversation and the excitement.

Why? Because NFV is what service providers have decided they want, and need, right now. And that is a unique and unprecedented occurrence in the history of the telecom industry. For the first time, we are seeing the top technologists in the service provider community get out in front of the vendors and set a new direction (and, it must be said, catching some of the incumbent equipment manufacturers on the hop).

So what on earth is going on with SDN? Is it possible that our entire industry has just gotten it wrong on this tech?

It's happened before, after all, as those of you (like me) that are old enough to remember the battle between ATM and IP in the late 1980s will recall. Back then pretty much the entire trade press backed asynchronous transfer mode to wipe IP and Fiber Channel off the network. Thirty years later and, well, you know how that worked out.

But that kind of catastrophic error of analysis isn't what is happening here, I think. There's no question that 21st century telecom networks must be automated and virtualized, but the reality is that defining SDN and implementing it in wide area commercial communications networks is non-trivial.

Regardless of what industry pundits think, the process will take years -- probably a decade, in fact.

What type of SDN will emerge at the end of that time? Forget about any SDN solution that requires service providers to rip and replace boxes to obtain benefits. That's not going to happen.

Overlay solutions offer advantages, but isn't SDN supposed to be about simplification and consolidation?

As has happened many times before, it's likely that a hybrid will emerge, with networks that are more programmable than they are today but still recognizable as wide area communications systems.

What's intriguing -- and where companies stand to win or lose an awful lot of money -- is working out how our industry will get from where we are now to that new architecture. And in the meantime, NFV offers immediate benefits.

So those were the biggest findings of my tour of telecom during the first quarter of this year. Do you agree with them? Please let me know on the message board below.

— Stephen Saunders, Founder and CEO, Light Reading

(12)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
7/17/2014 | 3:35:41 PM
Re: Ironically
I'd agree with that Mitch. 
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/17/2014 | 2:29:57 PM
Re: Ironically
Steve - In addition to the companies you name, I cite HP.
Infostack
50%
50%
Infostack,
User Rank: Moderator
7/11/2014 | 3:16:14 PM
Value Based Pricing
Steve,

Firstly, the epic protocol battles you referred to occurred in the mid to late 1990s.   Data was a relative pimple on the elephant's butt in 1990 and few even knew of IP.  This is important in terms of understanding the interplay between voice and data and how FCC policy intentionally and unintentionally resulted in "the internet" and why the concept of net neutrality is both fiction and farce.

Secondly, your layer 8 supports the "old school" of network economics in which value was based on cost.  The "new school" developed over the past 30 years has priced based on value.  I call it marrying the communications session to the commercial/economic transaction.  Settlements should be occurring at every layer and boundary given the extreme range of (marginal) demand and nearly infinite upside.

The distinction is significant in terms of how we look at and understand convergence of supply and divergence of demand, and new business models defined by:

Core vs edge

Digital vs analog

Horizontal vs vertical

Geometric vs linear

Marginal vs average cost

Until the carriers (edge access providers) realize this fundamental shift that began when we undertook a vertical/logical separation of the Monopoly 30 years ago they will continue to fall behind by 20-30% annually in terms of their ability to monetize their capex and opex based on value-based pricing.  The old silos have dissappeared (or will do so quickly) and they are all at the edge of the global core. 

The debate we should be having needs to be less about supply and more about demand stimulated by 4K VoD, seamless mobile BB, 2-way HD video collaboration, and the IoT.  These 4 trends represent a compression of all the change over the past 30 years into the next 10.  In other words, it is enormous.  As I've said elsewhere in comment fields on this site, the current discussions about where the carriers are reminds me of the parable where the "Emperor Has No Clothes".

BTW, the single biggest thing that has impacted the market since you left in 2007 was layer 2 offload in the smartphone foisted on AT&T by Steve Jobs.  Just think about that along the lines of what I said above and the importance of translating that to current policy debates on interconnection, settlements, and net neutrality.

Michael
nasimson
50%
50%
nasimson,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/10/2014 | 11:06:12 PM
welcome back
Steven you are back. And you are back with a bang. And you have hit the nail on its head. If this portal can crack the 8th OSI layer, you have lot of people like me as your permanent customers.
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
7/9/2014 | 8:06:30 PM
Re: Ironically
Mitch - which vendors are getting itright with balancing NFV and SDN in the portfolios? 

For me, Brocade and RAD have the most well thought out strategies, followed by ALU.

Who are your winners here? 

 
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
7/9/2014 | 8:03:14 PM
Re: Publication names
Hi Craig! 

I only included the joke because I knew you'd take it in good spirit! 

:)))

 

 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 5:32:32 PM
Re: Publication names
Yes, and it's something that will pass the test of time with flying colors.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 5:29:45 PM
Re: Publication names
Dennis,

I still think the best product name is...."Free Beer".  Who doesn't want to have Free Beer?

The ads, the marketing, all of it writes itself.

seven

 
Mitch Wagner
100%
0%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/9/2014 | 5:20:31 PM
Ironically
Ironically, NFV has a business advantage because the benefits are smaller. 

SDN promises to generate hundreds of millions of dollars in savings and additional revenue -- but first you have to rearchitect the entire network. Tell that to the CEO, and he says, great, let's form a committee to write a report to set up a working group to study the opportunity. 

Whereas with NFV, you might generate a much smaller savings and additional revenue. But it also requires a much smaller investment. You don't even have to go to the CEO to present the opportunity. You can go to him when you've generated results. Then iterate on a larger scale.  

NFV scales up much easier than SDN scales up. 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/9/2014 | 2:54:36 PM
Re: Publication names
Yeah -- everybody knows the real money is in creating a unique and distinctive brand -- like GigaMats or something.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from Column
What are the main steps that CSPs need to take in order to compete on the digital playing field?
The industry is at an inflection point, and one of the looming disruptors is 5G.
Network architects aiming to upgrade their networks to support agile, open, virtualized services in the 21st century need to consider new criteria when choosing between technology suppliers.
Cable companies still dominate the scene at INTX, the event formerly known as The Cable Show.
What is the best way to support both layer 2 and layer 3 services at the edge of the network that incorporates virtual network functions?
Flash Poll
From The Founder
Last week I dropped in on "Hotlanta," Georgia to moderate Light Reading's inaugural DroneComm conference – a unique colloquium investigating the potential for drone communications to disrupt the world's telecom ecosystem. As you will see, it was a day of exploration and epiphany...
LRTV Documentaries
Cable Eyeing SDN for Headend, Home Uses

5|26|15   |   05:57   |   (1) comment


CableLabs is looking at virtualizing CMTS and CCAP devices in the headend, as well as in-home devices, says CableLabs' Karthik Sundaresan.
LRTV Documentaries
Verizon's Emmons: SDN Key to Cost-Effective Scaling

5|22|15   |   03:53   |   (0) comments


For Verizon and other network operators to ramp up available bandwidth cost effectively, they need to move to SDN and agree on how to do that.
LRTV Documentaries
Lack of Universal SDN a Challenge

5|21|15   |   04:51   |   (3) comments


Heavy Reading Analyst Sterling Perrin talks about how uncertainty about SDN standards and approaches may be slowing deployment.
LRTV Custom TV
Steve Vogelsang Interview: Carrier SDN

5|20|15   |   05:02   |   (0) comments


Sterling Perrin speaks to Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, about the new Carrier SDN-enabling Network Services Platform and the operator challenges it solves.
LRTV Custom TV
Carrier SDN: On-Demand Networks for an On-Demand World

5|20|15   |   20:52   |   (0) comments


Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, talks about requirements and benefits of Carrier SDN during the keynote address at the Light Reading Carrier SDN event May 2015.
LRTV Documentaries
The Security Challenge of SDN

5|19|15   |   02:52   |   (0) comments


CenturyLink VP James Feger discusses concerns that virtualization could create new vulnerabilities unless network operators build in safeguards.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Elasticity – Highly Available VNF Scale-Out Architectures for the Mobile Edge

5|18|15   |   5:50   |   (0) comments


Peter Marek and Paul Stevens from Advantech Networks and Communications Group talk about their NFV Elasticity initiative and the company's latest platforms for deploying virtual network functions at the edge of the network. Packetarium XL and the new Versatile Server Module: 'designed to reach parts of the network that other servers cannot reach.'
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Bay Area Spark Meetup 2015

5|14|15   |   3:54   |   (0) comments


Developed in 2009, Apache Spark is a powerful open source processing engine built around speed, ease of use and sophisticated analytics. This spring, Huawei hosted a meetup for Spark developers and data scientists in Santa Clara, California. Light Reading spoke with organizers and attendees about Huawei's code contributions and long-term commitment to Spark.
LRTV Custom TV
The Transport SDN Buzz

5|12|15   |   06:01   |   (1) comment


Sterling Perrin, senior analyst at Heavy Reading, speaks with Peter Ashwood-Smith of Huawei and Guru Parulkar of ON.Lab about the evolution of transport SDN and the integration of technologies.
LRTV Custom TV
Next-Generation CCAP: Cisco cBR-8 Evolved CCAP

5|5|15   |   04:49   |   (0) comments


John Chapman, Cisco's CTO of Cable Access Business Unit and Cisco Fellow, explained the innovation design of Cisco's cBR-8, the industry's first Evolved CCAP, including DOCSIS 3.1 design from ground-up, distributed CCAP with Remote PHY and path to virtualization. Cisco's cBR-8 Evolved CCAP is the platform that will last through the transitions.
LRTV Custom TV
Meeting the Demands of Bandwidth & Service Group Growth

5|1|15   |   5:35   |   (0) comments


Jorge Salinger, Comcast's Vice President of Access Architecture, explains how DOCSIS 3.1 and multi-service CCAP can meet the demands of the bandwidth and service group growth.
LRTV Custom TV
DOCSIS 3.1: Transforming Cable From Hardware-Defined Network to Software-Defined Network

4|29|15   |   03:48   |   (0) comments


John Chapman, Cisco's CTO of Cable Access Business Unit and Cisco Fellow, explains how DOCSIS 3.1 can transform cable HFC network to a more agile software-defined network.
Upcoming Live Events
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 10, 2015, Chicago, IL
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
October 6, 2015, The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
October 6, 2015, Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Procera has gathered facts, stats and customer experience feedback from a survey of 540 users from across the globe.
Hot Topics
10 Alternate Uses for Tablets
Eryn Leavens, Copy Desk Editor, 5/22/2015
Bidding War for TWC Looks Likelier
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 5/22/2015
Charter Seals Deals for TWC, Bright House
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/26/2015
Eurobites: Alcatel-Lucent Trials 400G in Czech Republic
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 5/26/2015
Comcast Targets 6 New Gigabit Markets
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/21/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
On May 29th 10 AM ET, Steve Saunders, founder and CEO of Light Reading, will be drilling into the "pains and gains" of NFV with Saar Gillai, SVP & GM for NFV at Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ) (HP). He has defined a four-step NFV model describing a sequence of technology innovation. It's a must-read doc for any network architect looking to get to grips with their NFV migration strategy. Join us for the interview, and the chance to ask Saar your NFV questions directly!
With 200 customers in 60 countries, Stockholm-based Net Insight has carved out a solid leadership position in one of the hottest vertical markets going in comms right now: helping service providers and broadcasters deliver video and other multimedia traffic over IP networks. How has Net Insight managed to achieve this success in the face of immense competition from the industry giants?
My ongoing interview tour of the leading minds of the telecom industry recently took me to Richardson, Texas, where I met with Rod Naphan, CTO and SVP, Solutions, ...
Cats with Phones
Too Fluffy to Talk Click Here
Elmer found that his bountiful fur got in the way of meaningful conversation.