Light Reading

Enterprises Not Rushing to Embrace Cloud

Carol Wilson
8/23/2013
50%
50%

Enterprise IT departments have not embraced cloud services with the fervor once expected, say executives at two major telecom providers who are delivering cloud as well. The reasons are varied, but many are the same today as they were three years ago: IT execs fear moving their critical apps to the cloud means losing control, facing greater security risks and being locked into one provider's cloud.

So while cloud services are growing, for them to succeed as expected, telecom operators have to work harder to help enterprises through the transition and have to improve what their clouds deliver to make it more closely match enterprise requirements.

Doug Junkins, CTO of NTT America Inc. , spoke recently at a conference in Singapore and says he found enterprise executives were mostly raising the same familiar issues. "We are still trying to debunk the same common misconceptions about security, resource control and migration," he says. "There is a level of conservativeness in a lot of enterprise IT executives -- they are not willing to make what they see as wholesale changes."

A recent Verizon Terremark blog on debunking myths about cloud addressed the common issues with language similar to that of cloud conferences held in 2011, an indication that things haven't moved that far that fast. Verizon Terremark's sales of cloud services are increasing, says John Considine, CTO, but that's because business units within enterprises are going out to buy their own cloud-based resources, not because cloud services are being warmly embraced by the IT departments. (See 7 Truths About Cloud Computing.)

"We have taken a careful look at who is buying cloud services from us and in the enterprises that are adopting cloud computing, a lot of the work is coming directly from the business units, from the chief marketing officer, the R&D organizations -- non-traditional IT buyers. In many cases, we are pulling the IT folks along with us," he says.

Considine believes IT executives' fears about cloud services are being fed by hardware and software vendors who stand to lose sales if enterprise applications move to the cloud. "Server vendors, storage array vendors, network vendors -- they are not really interested in having cloud do well," he says. "They will help anyone who wants to, not use cloud. There are a lot of people trying to subdue cloud -- but even in the face of that kind of background drag on the system, cloud continues to grow."

Both Junkins and Considine believe enterprises will be won over by the long-term benefits of cloud-delivered services and apps -- lower capex and opex, greater flexibility in responding to market demands, and even, perhaps ironically, faster disaster recovery. But they say it is going to take more effort on the part of service providers and continuous improvement both in the cloud services themselves and in how the transition to cloud is managed.

"We are taking an educational approach," says Junkins. "We need to be able to demonstrate these benefits clearly to our customers. Any time your servers are connected to the Internet, there will be some level of risk and cloud isn't any different on that score. But you can use data duplication and move service from one location, so that if there is a disaster in California, for example, and the data has been backed up, then we can have you up and running more quickly on servers available in Virginia."

Considine says his team is constantly looking for success stories, where enterprises are using cloud to a competitive advantage, and he expects to see cloud continue to gain momentum in this way as well.

But the other piece of it is acknowledging that cloud services still need to mature, he adds. Verizon has been actively promoting what it calls the "cloud of tomorrow" via blogs such as this one, trying to drive home the difference between the service it offers and what is more commonly thought of as commodity clouds such as Amazon Web Services and others. Verizon also is talking about what needs to happen next for cloud services to succeed across a broad spectrum of enterprise applications, including some mission-critical ones.

More commodity cloud deployments require enterprises to plan for the potential failure of any component at any time, Considine says. That may work for applications that are stateless and can easily horizontally scale, but many critical enterprise apps don't fit that profile and would have to be substantially re-written -- a process for which enterprise IT folks don't always have the talent or the tools, he adds. In addition, all the effort and expense enterprises have spent around performance management goes away with a commodity cloud service, and the enterprise is forced to accept technology choices made by its cloud vendor, which leads to the loss of control and insecurity many enterprises fear.

"What we are asking is, are these attributes of cloud computing or the current implementations?" Considine says. "By doing cloud better, more workloads can go into the cloud, enterprises can find it easier to take advantage of it and you actually reduce the aspects of lock-in cost and the burden of making the transition and you end up with an overall better solution."

That's the solution-sell more telecom cloud providers are likely to be taking.

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(15)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/26/2013 | 2:38:58 PM
Re: Self-preservation
 

The fundamental problem is that we define all things "The Cloud".  I tried to break that into several categories earlier and yes I agree for a percentage of applications public cloud offerings will not be used.  On the other hand...SalesForce.  :)  Not much more private than customer information and price lists and yet SalesForce is going gang busters.

My point all along is that different solutions will work for different folks.  On top of that between time and cost nobody can move everything at once.  An enterprise might move A major application once every few years.

seven

 
sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/26/2013 | 2:30:57 PM
Re: Self-preservation
Thanks, and I see your point. But basically there are two types of customers--the mass market and businesses. Public clouds would work for the mass market, but private or hybrid clouds might be what businesses would prefer.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/26/2013 | 2:02:17 PM
Re: Self-preservation
The whole point of "The Cloud" is internet connected virtual environment.  The whole thing started around using public, shared resources in a virtual manner.

How does that become "Private"?  At that point, people are just using IP networking to 3rd party data centers.

seven

 
sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/26/2013 | 1:35:42 PM
Re: Self-preservation
I'm curious why you hate the term Private Clouds....
mark-r
50%
50%
mark-r,
User Rank: Light Beer
8/26/2013 | 1:14:45 PM
Re: Self-preservation
Perhaps the key addressing any valid (ie not self-preservation type) obstacles for enterprise cloud adoption is to allow (but not require) the enterprise app developers to have, as much as desired, in-depth control over their application deployment and execution environment in the cloud. An open platform as a service, with customizable development environment as well access to 'bare metal' server hardware would -- while providing the cloud benefits of virtually limitless, elastic capacity, horizontal scalability, everything on-line etc. -- enable full developer-controllability of all relevant aspects of running their applications.


Of course it also matters what the provider hosted server hardware is, in particular for high performance apps: for instance many of the ultra-low latency trading, risk calculus and some specialized work flows such as technical/scientific simulations, genomics algorithms etc. get their performance from specialized hardware such as GPUs and custom logic (FPGA) processors.

It is a challenge, but the progressive cloud providers will need to enable the application owners to control the performance impacting aspects of running critical applications in the cloud. The key to success is a platform (as a service) that makes it more productive to develop and deploy horizontally scalable, high throughput, low latency apps in the cloud than on the enterprise's own IT facilities.
telecom007
50%
50%
telecom007,
User Rank: Light Beer
8/26/2013 | 7:21:10 AM
Re: Self-preservation
If there is any "Massive" movement of the Enterprise space to the Cloud it's more on the likes as someone said "Private Cloud:".  Just look at the continued explosive growth of Data Centers.  Rack space in Data Fortresses have become no-brainers for Disaster Recovery or Better security than keeping all Enterprise-owned hardware on Prem.

For CRM services like Salesforce, yes One Button Bob might apply but you don't see that same ease/smoothness with Exchange or just about anything Microsoft whether it be the OS or Files.

As the article stated the Turf protection by Hardware vendors is a reality as I've also seen that in the same vein by Hardware vendors for Premise-based PBXs vs Hosted PBXs.  

Eventually the Vendor Turf protection will lose out over time but this is a longer play than what some were predicting.

 
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
8/24/2013 | 7:33:02 AM
Re: Resistance to change
Phil, restrictions on where data can reside is definitely having an impact on cloud services, especially in Europe. 

And brookseven, I like the phrase One Button Bob and I plan to re-use i liberally. 
Phil_Britt
50%
50%
Phil_Britt,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/23/2013 | 6:33:07 PM
Resistance to change
Even though people certainly will resist change, even some of the most resistant (financial services companies) are moving to the cloud now. But some will use only hybrid or private cloud models, especially for critical data.

The financial services providers, health care providers and others need to know where data resides, and there are limitations on the information that can reside on offshore servers. So some may never adopt full-blown cloud infrastructures, but the trend is certainly there.

 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/23/2013 | 4:43:28 PM
Re: Self-preservation
Carol,

Actually, I would argue it is the normal round peg problem with technologies.  There are places that various Cloud solutions work best, but it will never be 100%.  So, will the cloud take over everything?  No.

Secondly, any Enterprise can only change so many things at a time.  It is easier to adopt new technologies where they are seamless OR are greenfield.  Walking into a company and say...lets retire your Exchange Infrastructure...is a work of migration.  Migration ADDS work (and thus people/time) during the migration.  What I rarely see is what we used to call "One Button Bob" migration tools.  Press a button and the tool reads the data from the old tool and pre-populates the new one.

The reason this bit is often ignored is that (especially at the beginning) technologist tend to be evangelicals.  I am better/faster/cheaper so buy me!  Well, what if you are saving $100/year on a $1M budget?  You are better but its a LOW priority.

I remember talking at a Forum where I was next to Nan Chen talking about Carrier Ethernet.  I pointed out that Enterprises could really use the firing of the guys who know about T-carrier services and that was an awesome OPEX savings.  Nan (to paraphrase) said that OPEX savings was not about firing people.  But of course, that is exactly what it is about if it is going to be meaningful.  Most new technologies don't really think through the personnel restructuring.

In fact the way I would put it to a CIO is that he or she could redeploy the budget on higher value items and put rote services to a 3rd party.

seven

 
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
8/23/2013 | 12:26:01 PM
Re: Self-preservation
I think the points you raise are things with which my sources - Doug Junkins and John Considine -- would agree. 

People are resistent to change, which is why they want the new CRM to behave just like the old one. There are persistent concerns about turning over information and yes, as I noted yesterday, outages are all too common. 

That's why I think it's interesting that companies like NTT and Verizon are trying to evolve how they deliver cloud services. They may be facing impossible odds, as you seem to be saying, but I think they at least recognize the nature of the challenge. 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
From The Founder
Network architects aiming to upgrade their networks to support agile, open, virtualized services in the 21st century need to consider new criteria when choosing between technology suppliers.
Live Streaming Video
BTE 2015 Sponsor Keynote: HP
Dr. Prodip Sen, CTO, Network Functions Virtualization, HP
LRTV Custom TV
Red Hat Demo

7|2|15   |   10:53   |   (0) comments


Red Hat's Nicolas Lemieux demonstrates how Red Hat is driving innovation through open source communities.
LRTV Custom TV
Red Hat's Approach to OpenStack Adoption

7|2|15   |   5:17   |   (0) comments


Red Hat's Radhesh Balakrishnan outlines his company's open source strategy for both enterprises and telcos.
LRTV Custom TV
The New IP Goes Mobile With vEPC

7|2|15   |   1:12   |   (0) comments


Heavy Reading's Gabriel Brown discusses results of a Light Reading survey sponsored by Brocade that shows a clear commitment by mobile operators to move quickly to virtual EPC deployment.
LRTV Custom TV
Making Business Sense of SDN

7|2|15   |   1:42   |   (0) comments


Results of a Brocade-sponsored survey show that CSPs have a clear sense of SDN use cases but are wrestling with the business case. Sterling Perrin of Heavy Reading looks behind the numbers.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Will Be Here Sooner Than You Think

7|2|15   |   2:22   |   (0) comments


Forget the usual ten-year cycle for new technologies – NFV will be a core part of CSP networks in five years, based on results of a Brocade-sponsored survey, says Heavy Reading's Caroline Chappell.
LRTV Custom TV
The New IP Gains Traction With CSPs

7|2|15   |   1:42   |   (0) comments


Roz Roseboro of Heavy Reading analyzes results of a Light Reading survey sponsored by Brocade showing that CSPs are getting serious about making the transition to the New IP era.
LRTV Custom TV
It's (Real) Time for Analytics

7|2|15   |   1:42   |   (0) comments


Heavy Reading's Jim Hodges looks at how CSPs say they plan to use analytics to deploy new services in real time as part of The New IP, based on results of a survey sponsored by Brocade.
LRTV Documentaries
IoT in Action

6|30|15   |   1:39   |   (7) comments


Two co-workers discuss the benefits of IoT technology.
LRTV Interviews
Ericsson Opens Up on OPNFV

6|30|15   |   14:16   |   (1) comment


Martin Bäckström, VP and head of industry area Datacom at Ericsson, talks to Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the emergence of OPNFV, the importance of standards and Ericsson's OPNFV plans.
LRTV Custom TV
NetNumber Founder Discusses NFV/SDN Impact on SP Networks

6|26|15   |   4:15   |   (0) comments


NetNumber Founder Doug Ranalli examines why SPs need a new network infrastructure for service agility. While NFV and SDN are the tools, the old ways of thinking about signaling control are inhibitors. Doug provides his recommendations.
LRTV Custom TV
Orchestrating NFV vCPE Services Across Multivendor Networks

6|26|15   |   5:46   |   (0) comments


Nirav Modi provides an overview of vCPE, the fastest-growing NFV use case, showing how Cyan's Blue Planet orchestrates vCPE services across a multivendor infrastructure to rapidly deliver new managed services for business customers.
LRTV Custom TV
ZTE at LTE Summit Amsterdam 2015

6|26|15   |     |   (0) comments


As one of the leading global telecommunications providers, ZTE presented its cutting-edge technology at LTE World Summit 2015 in Amsterdam. On display at ZTE's booth were the latest R&D achievements in wireless, 5G development, HetNet, deep convergence of FDD and TDD, and RCS/IMD/iSDN/vCN.
Upcoming Live Events
September 16-17, 2015, The Westin Galleria Dallas, Dallas, TX
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
October 6, 2015, The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
October 6, 2015, Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
October 14-15, 2015, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, New Orleans, LA
November 5, 2015, Hilton Santa Clara, Santa Clara, CA
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Hot Topics
Who's Feeding Fiber to LinkNYC Hotspots?
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 6/29/2015
Colt to Jettison Ailing IT Business
Iain Morris, News Editor, 6/30/2015
Eurobites: Activist Investor Takes Stake in AlcaLu
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 6/30/2015
What's a Gigabit Good For?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 7/1/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Webinar Archive
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Casa Systems has been going from strength to strength over the last couple of years. In 2013, it became the first vendor to ship an integrated CCAP device -- the ...
Cedrik Neike, SVP of Global Service Provider, Service Delivery, at Cisco, talks to Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders about solving service provider customer problems in a virtualized, DevOps world, including multivendor support and the future of network procurement.
Cats with Phones