Sign up for our Free Telecom Weekly Newsletter
Connect with us
News Analysis   More News Analysis

Luxtera Chases Silicon Photonics

March 28, 2005 | Comments (19)
no ratings

Yet another silicon-optics breakthrough is afoot, as a startup claims it's produced a 10-Gbit/s modulator out of silicon using mass-production techniques.

Luxtera Inc. is announcing today that it's built that modulator using complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) processes. That means the device can be built using the manufacturing lines that already churn out millions of microprocessors and other chips, a high-volume factor that keeps the price of manufacturing down.

The 32-employee startup did this through three years of work with Freescale Semiconductor Inc. (NYSE: FSL), the former semiconductor arm of Motorola Inc. (NYSE: MOT). Luxtera's parts were built on the same assembly line that builds PowerPC chips for Apple Computer Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL), says Cary Gunn, Luxtera's chief technology officer.

Luxtera's is the latest in a string of silicon-photonics projects bearing fruit after years of work. Researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) unveiled their silicon-laser work late last year. And Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) has produced a modulator and a laser in silicon (see UCLA Claims First Silicon Laser, Intel's Modest Modulator , and Intel Claims Laser Breakthrough).

Luxtera emerged from research at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in 2001. In two rounds of funding, it's picked up $22 million from the likes of August Capital, New Enterprise Associates (NEA), and Sevin Rosen Funds. Luxtera also got funding from the Advanced Technology Program (ATP) at the U.S. Department of Commerce in 2002 (see Hot Components Research Rewarded).

Unlike Intel, Luxtera is avoiding the difficult task of building a laser out of silicon. Even so, the modulator wasn't exactly child's play. "The key thing is to make very small, very well controlled features," CTO Gunn says.

It's a problem of scale. A CMOS semiconductor can have line widths of 0.13 micron, but by comparison, a fiber-optic cable carries light in a core that measures 10 microns across. Like water aimed at a bottle opening too small, the light "spills around the edges," causing unacceptable loss, Gunn says. Luxtera gets around this using a proprietary means of coupling the fiber and modulator, but details aren't being disclosed.

So, what good does it do to have a CMOS modulator without a silicon laser? The idea is to bring costs down. Silicon can produce smaller and cheaper devices than materials such as lithium niobate (LiNbO3).

Luxtera also has plans on integrating other functions. Its modulator is a Mach-Zender device that works using waveguides, and that means the modulator chip can be augmented with other waveguide-based elements, such as filters and multiplexers. Based on lab work so far, the company believes it can "produce robust DWDM [devices] in silicon," says Alex Dickinson, Luxtera's CEO.

Intel, by contrast, is trying to get the whole optical shebang into silicon. "We're going to integrate all the stuff into silicon and bring down the whole cost of the transceiver," says Victor Krutul, Intel's senior manager of silicon photonics technologies.

The Local-Area Level

All this might be nice for the telecom market someday, but Luxtera and Intel are targeting enterprise networks instead, where there's more money to be made. "It just seemed to be a better financial opportunity," Dickinson says. "We think the value is in taking these technologies, which have typically been used at the long-range, and bringing them more to the local-area level."

In addition to making optics smaller and cheaper, Luxtera promises to bring higher performance to the LAN. Typical enterprise optics use 850nm wavelengths, which come in cheaper lasers. Luxtera is concentrating on the 1550nm case using single-mode fiber.

Similarly, Intel's interest lies in driving the use of optics as interconnects between systems or even between chips -- markets close to Intel's heart and more in line with the company's high-volume production. Make those into optical markets, and the volumes would dwarf telecom, Krutul says.

"In the long-haul or metro telecom markets, we're talking about units in the tens of millions," Krutul says. By contrast, "Intel makes over 50 million CPUs a year, and on top of that, you add chipsets" and other related devices, he says.

Luxera is claiming to have the upper hand on Intel so far. The Intel modulator was introduced at 1-Gbit/s speeds, and Luxtera officials point out that the device is too large and power-hungry to be a practical product.

Intel counters by noting that its results so far haven't been product releases. They've been research results published in the journal Nature. Intel does expect to turn the results into products eventually, and a spokesman says the team is working on getting the size and power consumption down accordingly.

As for the speed, Intel has gotten its silicon modulator to the 10-Gbit/s level and plans to publish those results next month, Krutel says.

Luxtera's first product samples -- an unspecified type of "integrated" device, Dickinson says -- are planned for the second quarter of 2006. Intel isn't disclosing its product roadmap.

— Craig Matsumoto, Senior Editor3, Light Reading

2012 International CES Slideshow
Newest Comments First       Display in Chronological Order
Page 1 of 2 Next >
Stevery
User Ranking
Wednesday March 30, 2005 1:29:37 PM
Suppose we would know a Genie that knows how to make anything out of a material X (ie any optical function) and you could ask for anything you want and she would deliver it.

Dear Genie:
Let's suppose that your magic material is in fact a photonic xtal. (If not, don't bother with the rest of this post.)
Here's your problem: Bragg reflectors have been around since pretty close to the time of Bragg. And E vs. k diagrams have been around pretty much since the time of Eastman Kodak, who had nothing to do with E-k after using EK as a stock symbol in the 1930s, but they made a ton of money and so probably serve as a nice image.
So photonic crystals are glorified Bragg reflectors with funky E-k. And this pseudo-new technology is a material in search of an app. You have 2 choices:

1. Use a photonic xtal for an existing app (like a 10Gb/s modulator). You are playing to a Better-Faster-Cheaper model of a company. But Bragg and E-k have been around for a long time (although using different language than photonic xtal) and people have engineered quite well without it. And even if you build the perfect modulator, you should ask yourself why one company per week is going bankrupt in this space. It's a tad overcrowded. Still. (BTW, DeauxFeaux beat me to the punch: I cannot think of a single fiber part where parts and labor of packaging are not dominant.)

2. Use a photonic xtal for a non-existing app. You a playing to a Brave-New-World company. Assuming I have a nice answer for this part, why on earth would I post it here?

And as a genie, if you look like Barbara Eden, you have a lot going for you. But only if you look like she did 30 years ago.

Signed,
Mr Cantankerous
deauxfaux
User Ranking
Wednesday March 30, 2005 10:12:25 AM
Remus

Focusing on the cost of the chips doesn't get close to the heart of the problem: the overall device cost.

Unfortunately, the package (including connector) costs dominate everything in this equation. For simple transcievers, only 2 or 3 devices (1 laser and 2PDs) are needed. Start with the price of OC-3 SFFs, drop the price by at least 20% and you have a starting point: for the whole function.

The point here is that integrating a few devices doesn't make a big impact, the cost of the bare die today are less than $2 (long wave). If you take those costs to $0, you haven't created a revolutionary cost advantage.

Worry about the package costs!
remusn2001
User Ranking
Wednesday March 30, 2005 6:18:37 AM
no ratings
Hi everyone,

I have a question/poll I would like to run. Suppose we would know a Genie that knows how to make anything out of a material X (ie any optical function) and you could ask for anything you want and she would deliver it. (ok this sounds a bit like a joke though I am only partially joking)

What would you want to have integrated on a chip? I would like to have some concrete examples(the more concrete the better) from those that work on the systems side (ie what and how many: photodetectors, muxes, wavelength converters, directional switches, modulators, laser sources…..) If you would also tell me how many chips would you buy and how much would you be willing to pay for each chip would be even better.:-)

Thanks,

R
tera
User Ranking
Tuesday March 29, 2005 9:02:50 PM
no ratings
From their website:
"How do you generate light in silicon?
Actually, we don’t."

rubinho
User Ranking
Tuesday March 29, 2005 6:16:07 PM
no ratings
At this point Luxtera must be mounting some type of InP laser on the silicon chip and trying to couple it. How would they go about doing this? Are they using a surface emitter or edge emitter laser? I would be interested to know how they couple the light into the silicon chip.
Half-Inch Stud
User Ranking
Tuesday March 29, 2005 10:01:33 AM
no ratings
Er ah, perhaps they've poled some doped Silicon.

Hmmm, pm/V..LiNbO3 is looking good despite a higher Er.


deauxfaux
User Ranking
Tuesday March 29, 2005 9:46:53 AM
I don't scoff at the research, it is very worthy stuff. I do scoff at the economic value. There is no electrically pumped Si gain medium anywhere on the horizon, or even slightly beyond the horizon. Therefore the prospects for Si monolithic integration are nearly as dim as ever.

Materials problems are solved over many years, even decades, and are well beyond the scope of venture financed operations. The only credible "materials plays" have 90% of the bugs shaken out in the university (or large corporate) labs, and then take at least 5 years to make it to market.

No one has even touched the subject of yields or how such a large chip impacts the # of gross die on the wafer.

As I said on my Intel "Si Laser" post months ago; Bah Humbug
DZED
User Ranking
Tuesday March 29, 2005 7:42:05 AM
no ratings
You may scoff, but in the long run this is a technology with a future.

stevery is right in some respects, it could just be smoke and mirrors to gain funding, and right again the world does not need another 10G modulator.

What the world does need however is a way of integrating optical and electronic functions monolithically, no hybridisation or chip to chip coupling etc.

Long run might be 5-10 years, and since a number of co.s have already had a stab and failed Luxtera might not be the one to profit.
deauxfaux
User Ranking
Monday March 28, 2005 11:32:17 PM
That was good
Stevery
User Ranking
Monday March 28, 2005 11:17:55 PM
Have anyone read about the 10Gb/s Silicon modulator claimed here? ... I am interested in understanding how it works.

It's actually a fairly simple principle of operation.

There is an input at one end and an output at the other. The input takes several millions per year from investors. That input is split and then interference occurs.

If the system is in a state of "constructive" interference, then the construction of the devices interferes with profitability.

If the system is in a state of "destructive" interference, then lots of people without any training in the field with interfere in a destructive manner. "Experienced" but useless managers brought in by VCs often cause this interference.

The difference between the 2 states is determined by the applied bias. Frankly, my own bias is that I cannot see why the world wants yet another 10G modulator.


Page 1 of 2 Next >
The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
iPad App Ad
Pyramid Ad
Events
Carrier Cloud Forum Collocated with Cloud Connect
Monday, February 13, 2012
Santa Clara Convention Center, Santa Clara
Cable Next-Gen Broadband Strategies: Wideband, Wireless, PON & Beyond
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
The Cable Center, Denver
Ethernet Europe 2012
Tuesday & Wednesday April 17 & 18, 2012
Hilton Munich Park Hotel, Munich, Germany
Strategic Opportunities in Service Provider Wi-Fi
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
The Landmark, London, U.K.
Tower Technology Summit Collocated at International CTIA Wireless
Tuesday, Wednesday, & Thursday
May 8-10th, 2012
Morial Convention Center, New Orleans
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured
Resource Library SPONSORED CONTENT
On-Demand Webinar: Infusing Cloud Services with Ecosystem Innovation - by IBM Presenters: Scott Stainken, General Manager, IBM Global Telecommunications Industry; Melanie ...
Podcast: Best Practices for Communications Service Providers when Deploying New Services - by IBM Overview: Translate cost savings into competitive advantage Communications Service Providers ...
An e-Guide to Policy Control, July 2011 - sponsored by Openet Overview: This new Light Reading e-Guide takes a look at some of the key developments in the ...
Evolve Your Network - Simpler, Smarter, Faster - by Alcatel-Lucent Presenters: Salvador Lopez, Senior Manager, Optical Business Development-Solutions and ...
Chalk Pushcast Software Webcast: Media Rich Training and Compliance Communications on BlackBerry Smartphones - by BlackBerry Presenters: Jody Glidden, Director, Chalk Media Overview: More and more, workforces are ...
IT Best Practices Webcast: Mobile Policies and Processes for Employee-owned smartphones - by BlackBerry Presenters: Mark Keating, Director - Platform Marketing, Research In Motion; Maribel Lopez, ...
On-Demand Webinar: Introducing BlackBerry Enterprise Server Express: Mobility for your Business Presenter: Erin Ransom, Sr. Product Marketing Manager, Research In Motion Overview: Learn how ...
On-Demand Webinar: BlackBerry Enterprise Server Express for the Small-to-Medium Sized Business Presenter: Shabbir Lasani, Product Marketing Manager - Small and Medium Business, Research In ...
On-Demand Webinar: Deploying BlackBerry Enterprise Server Express Presenter: Ajay Malhan, Technical Account Manager - IT Channel, Research In Motion Overview: ...

Enabling People and Organizations to Harness the Transformative Power of Technology