News Analysis   More News Analysis

IPTV vs Me-Too TV

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Content may be king, but can phone companies become king of content?

That's the big question everybody has about telcos and IPTV. They will have to strike the right content deals and partnerships and open up their networks if they want to profit from new technology such as IPTV, according to a group of executives here at the 13th annual Symposium, “Next Generation Media Networks," presented here by the Stanford Networking Research Center and Accel Partners.

It won't be easy. Already, the entertainment industry is entwined in a web of complicated and often exclusive licensing deals, and getting the right content will be a challenge for the telcos.

For example, Bob Greene, senior vice president of advanced services for Starz Entertainment Group LLC, took the audience here through the complex series of licensing agreements involved in acquiring movies:

First, movies are released to theatres. About six months after that, the movie is sold and rented on home video. It is only after that, about 1.5 months after the home video release, that the movies become available on pay-per-view networks, usually though exclusive relationships with cable providers and their content partners such as Starz. In fact, movies are typically licensed on an exclusive basis for about eight or nine years, says Greene, after which licensing is finally opened up to general broadcast rights.

Greene said that breaking into these exclusive relationships is the biggest barrier to folks that want to deliver content over broadband. "Exclusivity and ownership of rights are very important."

In digital music distribution, the licensing issues may not be as complex as with movies, but they are substantial. Rob Glaser, chairman and CEO of RealNetworks Inc., said the music publishers need quality and security guarantees from service providers in order to sell music online.

Glaser -- on a panel called "New Media: Is Content Still King?" -- held out the most optimism for the telcos, saying they have a window of opportunity to partner with the entertainment industry.

"Service providers have a very substantial opportunity to play a big role, especially if they take on a role such as DoCoMo in being the gatekeeper," said Glaser.

He said Japan's NTT DoCoMo Inc. (NYSE: DCM) has developed the best model for marketing entertainment content through new telecom networks by taking a cut of revenue in exchange for helping new content providers market their services over their network.

Proponents of more open, Internet-based models said that plenty of new content and business models will crop up if telcos employ an open, IP-based video platform. Jeremy Allaire, the founder and president of Brightcove, an IPTV content startup, says the emergence of open IP networks will create a new generation of content providers.

"An open platform gives content providers control over the brand and customer relationship," says Allaire. This, he feels, will create an explosion of niche content that folks can access directly over open, IP-based systems. "Nearly every small niche can be economically supportable."

Can telecom carriers, which have little experience with content and licensing, pull it off? Optimists such as Glaser, say yes. But others, such as Greene, say they should leave it to partners and just focus on the pipes themselves.

Later in the day, on a panel called "The Battle for the Living Room," executives from companies such as Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT), Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO), Sony Corp. (NYSE: SNE), and Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX) debated the future of IPTV and its impact on consumers.

Reed Hasting, founder and CEO of Netflix, said the industry had reached a crucial juncture, where it would be choosing between "freedom and control." He said that closed, proprietary TV systems such as those present on cable systems represent control, while open, IP-based networks represent freedom.

Hastings said that the industry will thrive only if multiple access networks develop and service providers pursue innovative products based on open technology. But Hastings said telcos are going down the wrong path if they are out to copy cable offerings:

"The tragedy is that the telcos are going to spend billions of dollars to do me-too TV."

Meanwhile, Moshe Lichtman, corporate vice president of Microsoft TV, showed the power of the Microsoft marketing machine with a flashy demo of Microsoft TV, navigating through a dizzying array of video content, including showing as many as five streams of video on one screen. Word on the street is that this "wow" demo is how Microsoft sold Microsoft TV to SBC Communications Inc. (NYSE: SBC). But don't hold your breath -- Lichtman said the day when you can buy a set-top box with a plug-and-play version of Microsoft TV that could be instantly activated by service providers is still two years away.

— R. Scott Raynovich, US Editor, Light Reading

Newest Comments First       Display in Chronological Order
Page 1 of 2 Next >
brookseven
User Ranking
Saturday May 28, 2005 1:18:38 AM
no ratings

I will have to take the 5th on your first question. But let me say in the 6th months that the program has been really rolling many more than the number of connected homes by all sources prior to this rollout for all years combined.

Yes they wired up the houses over a few decades, so 1 decade is faster right?

seven
rjmcmahon
User Ranking
Saturday May 28, 2005 12:09:46 AM
If you listened AFC and then Tellabs earnings calls or read their financial reports you would see that their earnings were negatively impacted by the large number of Single Family Home ONTs being shipped to Verizon.

Do you have any pointers to links containing trustworthy data detailing how many ONTs have been shipped to VZ, how many have been physically installed, and VZ's install rate?

Have you thought about how many people would be required just to install that many homes a day?

Cable cos wired the country in a few decades. It had to be done on municipal level. Things were rolled up after the heavy lifting was done. The idea tha VZ will do the heavy lifting for the country seems ludicrous. They didn't even wire up the enterprises. They are buying AT&T after that fiber has been installed.

So how many premises has VZ really connnected in the last decade? My *guess* is a pittance.
brookseven
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 11:40:24 PM
no ratings

See, here is the thing. If you listened AFC and then Tellabs earnings calls or read their financial reports you would see that their earnings were negatively impacted by the large number of Single Family Home ONTs being shipped to Verizon.

Now you quoted an article that talked about a decade to complete a rollout. Given that this requires 10% per annum, that is a massive rollout of 6 Million Lines per year. That would require a rollout of 16,000 connections a day every day for 10 years. That is a massive rollout by any standard. Have you thought about how many people would be required just to install that many homes a day?

seven
rjmcmahon
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 9:23:58 PM
[The RBOCs] are going into TV.

I hope you don't have any retirement funds depending on it. If you do, you'd better start fighting to keep social security as an *insurance* program.

http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/43936

The Boy Who Cried Fiber
Verizon excites media with tales of TV
(This was news posted a while ago, 2004-05-14 09:57:33 to be exact.)
Written by Karl Bode


Business Week gleefully notes that Verizon will soon be offering 5, 15, and 30Mbps fiber speed packages; even 100Mbps for those interested - is next week good for you? If you've paid attention (which Business Week hasn't), you've been hearing these same fiber promises from Verizon for more than a decade.

From Nynex in their 1993 annual report: "We're prepared to install between 1.5 million and 2 million fiber-optic lines through 1996 to begin building our portion of the information superhighway."

From a Bell Atlantic press release in 1996: "Later this year, Bell Atlantic will begin installing fiber-optic facilities and electronics to replace the predominantly copper cables between its telephone switching offices and customers - The company plans to add digital video broadcast capabilities to this 'fiber-to-the-curb,' switched broadband network by the third quarter of 1997."

As of 2003 however, only 39,000 US homes were connected to fiber lines. While we're finally seeing some very strong movement toward fiber by Verizon in 2004, it's far from a national rollout, which some analysts predict could take up to a decade to complete. Yet Business Week seems to hint you'll be seeing 30Mbps in no time? Nortel's CTO says 20Mbps within several years? Many users still can't get DSL!

And it isn't because of a lack of funding. Aside from traditional revenue streams, states like Pennsylvania have doled out billions in incentives to Verizon to deploy fiber state-wide. Once that money was paid, lawmakers watered down state legislation to lower the bar on deployment. A decade old bill designed to deliver residential fiber gave Verizon billions, but gave residents scattered 1.5Mbps DSL.

The truth is, promises of fiber to the home have been held out like a carrot in the face of regulators for decades. Just last month, the New Jersey state Board of Public Utilities ruled that Verizon could only "moderately increase" the wholesale rates the bell charges competitors to lease their lines. Verizon's response to such an "outrage"? A threat to pull away from a quarter-billion dollar fiber optic deployment in the state.

Traditionally skeptical of bell behavior or not, news outlets need to treat Verizon (and their fiber promises) like the boy who cried wolf, and stop clapping like children watching clowns make balloon animals every time Verizon issues a press release. At this point, believe in Verizon fiber to the home only when you're seeing the soft glow of the LEDs from your 30Mbps connected Verizon modem.
brookseven
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 7:57:40 PM

rj,

They are going into TV.

At SBC, they are lured in by the seduction of doing TV on the cheap from a network perspective and getting up to a 33% take rate. Project Lightspeed has its first trial site up.

In Verizon, they are going a different route and have their first trial sites for video up.

In BellSouth, they already have 50,000 video customers from their FTTC deployment so they are not rushing in.

Now if you look at the news about Swisscom, you will note their complaint about the lack of Set Top Boxes. That is the biggest issue in rolling out IPTV today. MPEG-4 AVC and VC9 STBs that are both feature rich and cheap are not yet available.

seven
rjmcmahon
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 7:41:03 PM
The execs at the RBOCs have promised Wall Street that video is their path to revenue growth. Now they have to figure out how to do it.

AOL/Time Warner promised Wall Street all kinds of things. Nothing happened. Why are the RBOC promises of today going to be any different?

In my opinion, regardless of what they say about the superiority of IPTV, its main attraction to an RBOC executive is that it can deployed at a lower cost than a cable network using much of their existing infrastructure.

People getting into the low cost video business are folks like Telemundo. No wires required. One just needs to find an underserved demographic. Why didn't the RBOCs get into that?

The RBOCs actions suggest they are not going into TV, despite such promises. Begs the question, why make the promises?
douggreen
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 6:51:17 PM
RJM,

IMO, it doesn't matter what the executives believe. Their traditional revenue streams going downhill. Wireless bailed them out for a while, but that is now becoming a commodity with decreasing margins. The execs at the RBOCs have promised Wall Street that video is their path to revenue growth. Now they have to figure out how to do it.

They've tried partnering with satelite companies. A few of them even experimeted with an HFC cable TV offering on a trial basis. Neither of these proved to be profitable.

In my opinion, regardless of what they say about the superiority of IPTV, its main attraction to an RBOC executive is that it can deployed at a lower cost than a cable network using much of their existing infrastructure.

Customers won't change from cable or satelite based on theoretical advantages. Until we see exactly what the content offering is and how much it cost, the whole IPTV story is simply slideware.
brookseven
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 6:51:15 PM

They do at SBC. At Verizon they do not, which is why they are doing FTTP.


rjmcmahon
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 5:21:46 PM
It is a problem because if you ask the telco's they believe they have an advantage by offering a new way to access TV and entertainment services.

Do you think the strategic level executives at places like SBC/VZ believe this to be true?
brookseven
User Ranking
Friday May 27, 2005 4:56:02 PM

rj,

It is a problem because if you ask the telco's they believe they have an advantage by offering a new way to access TV and entertainment services. They do not.

This is not on any of your hot buttons, but should scare the beejesus out of SBC.

seven
Page 1 of 2 Next >
LIGHT READING MARKET PLACE
Your Customer Experience Defines You
OnProcess helps market leaders proactively improve their customers' experiences
Free e-Signature Site
Try it Now - It Only Takes Seconds! Used by Fortune 500 and Worldwide. Send & Sign Documents Online.
Conferencing System
Enter Now to Win Two Polycom Video Conferencing Systems. Details Here!
Used and Refurbished Cisco Switches
Purchase Your Switches From Network Liquidators. Savings of Up to 90% with a Lifetime Warranty!
Free Cell Phones
Get a New Cell Phone or Upgrade for Free. Smart Phones, Blackberries and more.
The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Tech Resources
Ethernet Academy Ad
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured
Podcasts SPONSORED CONTENT
Services Transformation - by Alcatel-Lucent Communications service providers want to be able to bring new services to...
Rural Ops Bridge the Digital Divide - by Tellabs Tellabs helps IOCs build triple play networks
Driving Network Transformation - by Alcatel-Lucent In order to deal with competitive pressures, the change in service models...
Back(haul) to the Future - by Tellabs Tellabs works with Vodafone to meet growing mobile broadband demands.
MRS Logistica - by Tellabs Tellabs helps MRS Logistica transform its existing, largely outdated TDM networks to IP.
Carrier Ethernet Offers an Enterprising Solution - by Tellabs What is VPLS and how does it work? Tellabs takes a closer look.
Swisscom’s Network Makeover - by Tellabs Fresh off the launch of 7.2 Mbps HSDPA, Swisscom sees 3G as an opportunity to launch a unifying ...
Telecom in Namibia - by Tellabs Tellabs helps Telecom Namibia with next-gen challenges
Companies
Alcatel-Lucent (5872), AT&T (1948), BellSouth (848), BT (1287), Cablevision (615), Cisco (5297), Comcast (1910), Cox Communications (858), Deutsche Telekom (807), eBay (Skype) (345), Ericsson (1617), France Telecom (964), Google (489), Huawei (1045), Intel (1127), Juniper (2022), Microsoft (1115), Motorola (1486), Nokia Siemens Networks (2645), Nortel (3956), NTT (173), Siemens (1359), Sprint (1059), Telefonica (439), Time Warner Cable (969), Verizon (2587), Vodafone (510), Yahoo (339)

Broadband
Access equipment (2169), Access technologies (2378), Broadband loop carriers / multiservice access nodes (388), Cable modem termination systems (CMTSs) (1104), Cable TV chips (286), DSL (2425), DSL chips (227), DSLAMs (703), Free-space optics (35), FTTx (3265), Gaming consoles (58), Gaming servers (22), Media adapters (23), Municipal networks (106), PON (1364), PON chips (217), Satellite (497), WiMax (880), Wireless LAN (354)

Cable Digital
Cable Modems (681), Cable/MSO equipment (2802), CableLabs (470), Compression (MPEG-2 and MPEG-4) (279), Docsis (1046), Embedded multimedia terminal adapters (E-MTAs) (213), Head-ends (233), PacketCable (129), QAM (307)

Chips, Components & Subsystems
ASICs & FPGAs (101), ATCA (480), ATM chips (13), Comm chips (2360), Dispersion compensators (149), Lasers (920), Modulators (163), Mux/demuxes (299), Network processors (933), Optical amplifiers (349), Optical channel monitors (92), Optical components (2824), Speciality fiber (94), Switches & OADMs (397), Transceivers (1247), Transmission fiber (419), Variable optical attenuators (139)

Ethernet
10-Gbit/s Ethernet switches (1454), Access devices (272), ATM switches (333), Circuit emulation (16), Converged access (103), Ethernet chips (573), Ethernet equipment (2212), Ethernet over copper (231), Ethernet PONs (160), Ethernet services (1909), Ethernet technologies (568), Multipoint (131), Multiservice edge equipment (143), Multiservice provisioning platforms (622), Multiservice switches (389), PBT (Provider Backbone Transport) (256), Point-to-point (139), Pseudowire (Layer 2 tunnels) (132)

IP & Convergence
B-RASs (229), Cell/WLAN (77), Compression equipment (13), Core routers (1294), DNS (56), Edge routers (1686), ENUM (53), Fixed/Mobile Convergence (485), GMPLS (76), IMS (1088), IMS Control Layer (27), IMS Service Layer (27), IP equipment (1224), IP software (381), IP technologies (1482), IPv6 (99), Layer 3 VPNs (194), MPLS (1774), MPLS (687), Multicast (36), P2P (258), Pseudowire (Layer 2 tunnels) (132), QOS (350), SIP (396), Traffic managers (808), Wireline/Wireless (59)

Mobile/Wireless
3G Evolution (175), Broadcast (Mobile TV, etc.) (189), Carrier WiFi (226), CDMA (3G) (367), Core Network (173), EV-DO (126), Femtocells (30), Fixed Wireless (Microwave, etc.) (71), Fourth Generation (4G) Wireless (70), GSM/EDGE (430), HSDPA/HSUPA (321), IMS Core (47), Long-Term Evolution (LTE) (188), Mobile Advertising (24), Mobile Music (31), Mobile TV (130), Mobile Video (65), Mobile WiMax/WiBro (92), Mobile/Wireless (5877), Packet Core (61), Radio Access Network (236), TD-SCDMA (Chinese 3G) (67), Transmission (38), Ultra-Mobile Broadband (UMB) (8), UMTS(3G) (340), Voice Core (21), WiMax (880), Wireless Backhaul (272), Wireless Chips (191), Wireless LAN (354)

Optical Networking
40-Gbit/s transmission (452), Core optical switches (760), CWDM (289), DWDM (1842), Long-haul WDM equipment (654), Metro optical switches, ROADMs (1173), Metro WDM equipment (773), Multiservice provisioning platforms & add/drop muxes (375), Optical equipment (2191), Optical switches & crossconnects (398), Optical technologies (417), Sonet/SDH (1036), Sonet/SDH chips (351), Wavelength services (305)

Security
Anti-virus (29), Denial-of-service attacks (44), Encryption (97), Endpoint security (22), Firewalls (61), Intrusion detection & prevention (45), IPSec VPN (801), Security (1835), SSL VPN (862), URL filtering (12), User authentication (24)

Services Software
Activation (415), Billing systems (761), Content/software downloads (231), Customer relationship management (231), Data Integrity (61), Element management systems (36), Fault management (69), Inventory management (153), Mediation systems (204), Messaging (231), Middleware (72), Mobile location (41), OSS (2584), Performance monitoring (335), Policy control (269), Provisioning (553), Revenue assurance & fraud management (334), Service delivery platforms (SDPs) (328), Service management (220), Service-oriented architectures (310), Services (2480), Web gateways (56), Web services (124), XML (51)

Test & Measurement (Sponsored by Etaliq Inc)
Access equipment Access test & measurement equipment (126), Comm chips Comm chips test & measurement equipment (29), Ethernet equipment Ethernet test & measurement equipment (170), IP equipment IP test & measurement equipment (122), MPLS MPLS test & measurement equipment (14), Optical components Optical components test & measurement equipment (113), Optical equipment Optical test & measurement equipment (886), OSS OSS test & measurement (1059), Sonet/SDH Sonet/SDH test & measurement equipment (1599), Test & measurement (1755), VOIP equipment VOIP test & measurement equipment (145)

Video (Sponsored by Ericsson Televisionary)
Broadcast (Mobile TV, etc.) (189), Broadcast video equipment (including encoding) (730), Content delivery network (CDN) (394), Content protection (270), DVRs (665), Internet Video (840), IPTV (3461), Middleware & business support systems (845), Set-top boxes (1624), Stored video servers (379), TV (3581), Video equipment (2448), Video services (4130), Video software (1349), Videophone (185), VOD (2635)

VOIP
Application servers (186), Centrex (198), Conferencing (78), Contact centers (38), Enhanced voice (34), Enterprise (637), Media gateways (357), Messaging (73), Presence management (43), Residential (835), Session border controllers (398), Signaling gateways (104), Softswitches (1090), VOIP chips (167), VOIP equipment (3423), VOIP services (3768), VOIP software (620), VOIP VPNs (28), Wholesale (220)