Light Reading
We test the network performance of the Cisco UCS's Virtual Machine Fabric Extender

Virtual Machine Fabric Extender Performance

Light Reading
Series Column
Light Reading
1/29/2012
50%
50%

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Cisco UCS’s Virtual Machine Fabric Extender (VM-FEX) offers consistently increased network performance operations compared to virtual distributed switch installations.


In a standard Local Area Network, various hosts, laptops and PCs typically connect to a Layer 2 switch that aggregates the physical stations before handing them off to a router. Communication between two hosts on the same LAN can be done directly without reaching the router. Similarly, a virtual switching instance passes traffic either to a VM sitting in the same hardware, or pushes it out the physical port. Virtual Switches (such as the Cisco Nexus 1000v or VMware’s vNetwork Distributed Switch) operations are done in software and Virtual Switches (such as the Cisco Nexus 1000v or VMware’s vNetwork Distributed Switch) operations are done in software and therefore take resources away from the virtual machines hosted on the blade. Reducing the amount of resources available to the VMs.

Cisco's Nexus 1000v has a rich set of capabilities such as VLAN aggregation, forwarding policies and security. Cisco, however, found that not all VM installations require these features, and in such cases it makes sense to save the resources taken by the virtual switch and appropriate them to the customer needs.

Cisco claimed that their Virtual Machine Fabric Extender (VM-FEX) in VMDirect mode replaces the switch and shows a significant increase in CPU performance for network intensive applications. VM-FEX, installed on VMWare ESX 5.0, enables all VM traffic to be automatically sent out on the UCS's Virtual Interface Card (VIC). This meant more traffic on the physical blade network interface, but reduced CPU usage, which is typically the VM bottleneck. To verify that the VM-FEX really frees up CPU resources, we ran a series of tests comparing a VM-FEX-enabled UCS blade to a Nexus 1000v virtual switch setup. Both UCS blade installations were identical in all aspects apart from the use of the VM-FEX in one and Nexus 1000v in the other.

We started comparing the performance between the two setups using Ixia’s virtual tools. We installed four Ixia IxNetwork VMs on each of the two UCS blades and sent 3,333 Mbit/s of traffic from each of the first three VMs, toward the fourth for 120 seconds using 1,500-byte frames. In the VM-FEX case we recorded 2.186 percent frame loss, while in the distributed switch environment we recorded 16.19 percent frame loss.

We expected loss in both cases, given the almost 10Gbit/s load we were transmitting in the virtual space. The load was required in order to really keep the CPU busy. We deduced from this initial test result that in the VM-FEX environment less resources were used, which is why the frame loss we recorded was smaller than the loss recorded in the virtual distributed switch setup.

For the next test setup we installed one IxLoad VM on each of the two blades. We configured both IxLoad VMs as HTTP clients that requested traffic from a Web server Cisco configured. The IxLoad emulated clients were configured to try and use as much bandwidth as possible by requesting 10 different objects from 10 URLs repeatedly. The VM-FEX setup reached 9.87 Gbit/s while the distributed switch reached 7.78 Gbit/s. The CPU usage was also significantly higher in the virtual distributed switch setup when compared to the VM-FEX setup.

Using the Ixia test tools we recorded the performance difference we expected. Cisco recommended that we perform a test that relies more heavily on the Storage Area Network (SAN). For this test, Cisco helped us to set up 10 VMs on each of the two setups, and install IOmeter on each virtual machine. IOmeter was configured to read blocks from an iSCSI-based SAN as fast as it possibly could. We manually started each of the twenty IOmeter instances, and after 10 minutes we manually stopped each of them. At the end, we looked at three statistics -- Input/Output Operations per Second, Data Rate, and Average Response Time -- all three averaged across the 10 VMs in each setup. The VM-FEX performance was indeed higher for all three metrics. The data is shown in the graph below:

We were still curious what the difference would be when someone is running a common task on a single VM. We wrote a script to use the open source program mplayer to encode a DVD image file that was stored in the SAN into mpeg (for private use of course). We wrote two versions of the script -- one performed an additional round of encoding. The results of this test run actually showed that the act of fetching blocks off the network-attached DVD were not too resource intensive as the VM-FEX setup required only marginally less time to perform the encoding than the virtual distributed switch setup.

Perhaps the most interesting metric was not the performance, but rather the CPU utilization. How much of the CPU was used for the operation, and how much was left over for other operations and other users? As shown below, the VM-FEX setup used far less of CPU resources in all cases. This was expected, since the CPU was skipping an entire layer of virtual switching, and this was, after all, exactly what Cisco wanted to demonstrate.


Next Page: Virtual Security Gateway
Previous Page: Unified Fabric (UF) – UCS Manager


Back to the Cisco Test Main Page

(0)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Flash Poll
Wagner’s Ring
Data Centers Drive Telcos Into the Future

8|28|14   |   2:20   |   (2) comments


Data centers are at the heart of key trends driving telecom -- network virtualization, the drive for increased agility, and the need to compete with OTT providers.
LRTV Custom TV
Why SPs Should Consider Cisco's EPN

8|27|14   |   5:40   |   (0) comments


Sultan Dawood from Cisco discusses Cisco's EPN, which enables SPs to build agile and programmable networks delivering new network virtualized services using Cisco's Evolved Services Platform (ESP).
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei’s Showcase @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   2.56   |   (0) comments


SoftCOM is Huawei's framework for telecom business and network transformation. Haofei Liu, Solution Marketing Manager, Carrier Business Group, Huawei, showcases Huawei's SoftCOM architecture in this video.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of Integrated Solutions on SoftCOM & NFV Monetization

8|26|14   |   4.43   |   (0) comments


Libin Dai, Director of Integrated Solutions, Carrier Business Group, discusses Huawei's SoftCOM and NFV monetization. Huawei believes that NFV monetization should be service-driven rather than network-driven, and that operators should have network transformation, service transformation and a compatible and collaborative ecosystem in place in order to deploy NFV.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of US NFV Lab on CloudEdge & the Future of NFV

8|26|14   |   4.06   |   (0) comments


Sean Chen, Director of US NFV Lab at Huawei, discusses Huawei's new approach to NFV in open collaboration. Huawei believes that through Proof of Concept tests, it could help operators learn and communicate with the industry more effectively. Sean believes that successful implementation of NFV should have its values reaching to end users and discusses how Huawei's ...
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Highlights @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   3.34   |   (0) comments


At the Big Telecom Event in Chicago Huawei showcases its high-level strategy, the SoftCOM architecture, which helps operators reduce the cost of ownership of their network infrastructure and generate additional revenue in the ICT service environment. Huawei showcases over 30 pilot programs from across the globe, focusing on the industry-leading commercial ...
LRTV Custom TV
VeEX – Live from the Show

8|21|14   |   5:58   |   (0) comments


An overview of VeEX Test and Measurement solutions including TX300S multi-service test set with VeExpress cloud-based management system, UX400 universal modular platform supporting 100G testing, and the redesigned RXT modular platform.
LRTV Custom TV
Transitioning CE 2.0 Networks Into the SDN & NFV Era With Telco Systems

8|19|14   |   5:19   |   (0) comments


Telco Systems' Ariel Efrati (CEO) and Moshe Shimon (VP of Product Management) discuss virtualization and how the company's new Open Metro Edge solution utilizes the SDN and NFV concepts to accelerate and orchestrate service delivery through its innovative product portfolio and software applications.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Myths: Is NFV Still Several Years Away?

8|11|14   |   1:13   |   (0) comments


Some say that NFV (network functions virtualization) is still several years away from being implemented on mobile operator networks. This isn't the case. Operators can get started on their paths to NFV now, as this short video from Skyfire shows.
LRTV Custom TV
A New Security Paradigm in SDN/NFV

7|28|14   |   02:54   |   (0) comments


Paul Shaneck, Global Director Network Solutions for Symantec, discusses the evolving virtualized network, explaining how Symantec is leading the security discussion as it relates to SDN and NFV, and helping to ensure the network is protected and compliant.
LRTV Documentaries
Sprint's Network Evolution

7|24|14   |   14:59   |   (0) comments


Sprint's Jay Bluhm gives a keynote speech at the Big Telecom Event (BTE) about Sprint's network and services evolution strategy, including Spark.
LRTV Documentaries
BTE Keynote: The Software-Defined Operator

7|24|14   |   18:43   |   (1) comment


Deutsche Telekom's Axel Clauberg explains the concept of the software-defined operator to the Big Telecom Event (BTE) crowd.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 23, 2014, Denver, CO
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
A survey conducted by Vasona Networks suggests that 72% of mobile users expect good performance all the time, and they'll blame the network operator when it's not up to par.
Hot Topics
Rogers, Shaw Take Aim at Netflix
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 8/26/2014
Utilities to Pump $11.2B Into Smart Grid – Study
Jason Meyers, Senior Editor, Utility Communications/IoT, 8/26/2014
Verizon Launches QR Code Security Solution
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 8/26/2014
Fiber Revival at Deutsche Telekom
Iain Morris, 8/25/2014
M2M's In Fashion: Wearables Play the US Open
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 8/25/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed