Light Reading - Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research
Sign up for our Free Telecom Weekly Newsletter
Connect with us

Telecom News Analysis  

Gray Market Optics Go 40G

Network Hardware Resale (NHR), the company that recently started selling OEM-compatible optics, is catching up with the high end, having begun selling 40Gbit/s modules.

The company also tells Light Reading it's exceeding its projected $10 million in sales of NHR-branded optics for the year.

The move to 40Gbit/s is a further step in legitimizing the gray market for optical transceiver modules. Systems vendors, Cisco Systems Inc. in particular, provide the optical modules that go with their gear -- sometimes at a fabulous markup.

But the modules they provide are acquired from optical vendors; the only difference is a software tweak such as an ID number. That's gotten NHR, and other companies such as OSI, interested in selling the optical modules directly to customers at a lower price.

"That was really the realization. You get all these branded transceivers, and time after time, you see 'Agilent' or 'Finisar' or 'Oclaro' on them," says Mike Sheldon, NHR's CEO.

This has been going on for a while, but NHR took it a step further in October by putting its own brand name on the optics. They're still the same off-the-shelf modules, but the company is being more brazen about selling them, essentially.

Sheldon has never asked Cisco or the other OEMs what they think of NHR's optics business. "We frequently reach out with olive branches, to Cisco in particular, and we generally don't get conversations to happen," he says. "If they care at all, they're not happy about it, but they don't seem to care that much in general about us."

That could change. Direct optical sales have been an add-on business -- something NHR didn't emphasize -- and have largely been at the 1Gbit/s level. The recent push into 10Gbit/s, and now 40Gbit/s, suggest this business could start getting more competitive.

In fact, one module maker, Finisar Corp., is also getting into this market, selling transceivers directly to end customers that build their own switches, analyst James Kisner of Jefferies & Co. Inc. wrote in a report published Tuesday.

NHR has now taken things a step further by selling products from Menara Networks, the transceiver company that puts an optical transport network (OTN) and forward error correction (FEC) chip into its tunable 10Gbit/s DWDM transceiver module. That trick, announced in 2008, won Menara a Leading Lights award.

It represents the first time NHR is offering an optical module that differs from those sold by the OEMs.

The companies announced their partnership in March, but NHR didn't start selling Menara modules right away. The part that had really caught NHR's eye wasn't the OTN and FEC, but the fact that Menara's modules were tunable and pluggable. The problem is that tunable XFP modules for 10Gbit/s were becoming commonplace, and prices were dropping to about $3,000 or $4,000, compared with Menara's $6,000 to $8,000 Sheldon said.

— Craig Matsumoto, Managing Editor, Light Reading

Newest Comments First       Display in Chronological Order
dwx
User Ranking
Friday December 21, 2012 5:07:50 PM
no ratings

The 10x10 MSA specifies using 10 output wavelengths centered around either 1310 or 1550 I believe in a CFP form factor.   So you couldn't break out 10 "regular" physical 10GE connections because they aren't the normal 1310 wavelength.   Using CPAK gives Cisco the ability to do this (and the rumor I've heard is it is what they have already done), you can plug in a CPAK which supports 100GBase-LR4, LR10 (10x10 MSA), Lightwire (MM MPO), or a 10x10GE octopus or breakout cable which outputs 10 physical 1310 10GE connections.  

It's honestly a great idea given today's migration from 10GE to 100GE.   With the PTX from Juniper or ALUs XRS you need to replace interface cards when going from 10GE to 100GE.  

Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Friday December 21, 2012 2:25:03 PM
no ratings

Single form factor sounds good, but ... I thought 10x10 MSA *was* a CFP.

dwx
User Ranking
Thursday December 20, 2012 3:27:00 PM
no ratings
Cpak wont give them much of a density density edge versus newer offerings like the XRS from ALU, but will use less power. It also may allow them to build the optic where they can use a 10x10 breakout so customers only need one port type, like qsfp has been utilized. Vendors using CFP can't currently do that.
sailboat
User Ranking
Thursday December 20, 2012 10:26:22 AM
no ratings

Criag,

We should have a chat sometime about this subject... might be able to provide some illumination.

sailboat

Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Wednesday December 19, 2012 4:28:39 PM
no ratings

Maybe I'm buying too much into the general claims of CMOS always being better -- smaller, faster, cheaper....  :)

But I was also just thinking about the fact that Cisco seems to be using CPAK to leapfrog the 100G standards, thus using up less space and less power.  Roy Rubenstein at Gazettabyte ran a table of comparisons:

http://www.gazettabyte.com/home/2012/10/9/does-cisco-systems-cpak-module-threaten-the-cfp2.html

inquisitive
User Ranking
Wednesday December 19, 2012 2:43:31 PM

Good point about silicon optics only making sense at the high end (where the puck is going to), but even then I am not sure Lightwire is more power efficient than the current MSA stuff.  CFPs are direct modulation and silicon optics is external. I'm not sure I understand why Lightwire would be more power efficient ...

Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Wednesday December 19, 2012 2:25:08 PM

Excellent point, and that's definitely going to be an effect of CPAK and, in general, of Lightwire.

It only works at the high end, though.  I can't imagine Cisco wanting to put the investment behind doing its own 10G stuff, and of course it would be utterly pointless for 1G interfaces.

How about power savings? If Cisco can use Lightwire/CPAK to produce significantly lower-power modules than the normal channels do, would that be an advantage at 100G?

inquisitive
User Ranking
Wednesday December 19, 2012 1:33:31 PM

I think the reason Cisco bought Lightwire, actually, is so that it would be the only one putting CPAK modules into the market.  It is a lot easier to protect 500% mark ups on a form factor nobody else wants to supply. 

Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Wednesday December 19, 2012 12:53:04 PM
no ratings

Just got email from Worldwide Supply in Franklin, N.J., about how they sell SFPs and GBICs. I'm sure there are dozens of other suppliers who do this, too... but the part I think is interesting about NHR is the move into the high end.

Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Wednesday December 19, 2012 11:59:06 AM
no ratings

The fact that Finisar is selling optics directly kind of fell into my lap yesterday - it wasn't meant to be part of this story. I don't know much about it, but based on Kisner's report, it doesn't sound like an enormous business for Finisar or anything. 

And it's just directed at white boxes; I doubt Finisar would ever start selling directly to end customers in any big way. But I wanted to give it a mention.

The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.