Light Reading Cable – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research
Sign up for our Free Telecom Weekly Newsletter
Connect with us

LR Cable News Analysis  

AT&T Hands Its CDN Over to Akamai

Apparently giving up on its own content delivery network (CDN), AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) Thursday announced a deal to put Akamai Technologies Inc. (Nasdaq: AKAM) at the edges of its network.

The deployment will start in North America and will move internationally after about 12 months. AT&T's own CDN, which was announced last year, will be merged into the Akamai deployment in 2013, the companies said.

Financial terms weren't disclosed.

Why this matters
Carriers need CDNs; at least, that's the current thinking. But in AT&T's case, maintaining its own CDN -- using technology licensed from EdgeCast Networks Inc. and Cotendo Inc. -- was apparently not worth the effort.

As for why carriers need CDNs -- it's all the video content they're being asked to shunt around. Putting up a CDN means spending less money on routers and other equipment in the middle of the network.

Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ), meanwhile, is pursuing something a little more ambitious. Its Digital Media Services (DMS), launched early in 2011, is like a CDN that adds transcoding and formatting for different devices. Verizon's aim was to offer DMS to other carriers, including cable providers.

For more

— Craig Matsumoto, Managing Editor, Light Reading

Newest Comments First       Display in Chronological Order
Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Friday December 7, 2012 2:34:50 PM
no ratings

Ah, good point, ethertype. Although I'd note that enterprises are expected to generate a lot more video traffic (hence the need for CDNs).  Some of AT&T's CDN customers might be small providers grappling with video, too (theoretically possible, anyway).  But you are correct, I was taking a couple of turns my thinking there.

ethertype
User Ranking
Friday December 7, 2012 1:23:29 PM
no ratings

Craig, I think you're confusing CDNs.  You say carriers need CDNs for "all the video content they're being asked to shunt around," which implies this is all about managing AT&T's own network costs.  But the press release is all about forming "a strategic alliance to deliver a global suite of content delivery network (CDN) solutions to companies," i.e. selling solutions to enterprise customers.

Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Thursday December 6, 2012 3:29:06 PM
no ratings

So, was a CDN just too hard to manage, or too expensive?  Haven't had time to delve into the reasons behind this.

This can't be good for Edgecast.

The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.