Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research
Sign up for our Free Telecom Weekly Newsletter
Connect with us

LR Mobile News Analysis  

Apple Patent Win Puts Carriers in Driver’s Seat

no ratings

Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL)'s courtroom victory over Samsung Corp. could also convince the wireless operators to play a more active role in fostering a third mobile operating system ecosystem. (See Jury: Apple Guilty, But Samsung Much Guiltier.)

The U.S. operators have long wanted to see a strong third player emerge to lessen their dependence on only two OSs, Android and iOS. This is something executives from AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) and Verizon Wireless have stated in the past, even going as far as to defend Samsung in the patent wars. (See Verizon Defends Samsung Against Apple , Nokia's Third Ecosystem Starts With AT&T and CES 2012: It's Time for That Third Ecosystem, Microsoft.)

A trial may not have been the route they had in mind, but the Apple-friendly verdict could cause them to get more vocal in accelerating development of that third ecosystem. Jefferson Wang, wireless practice lead at IBB Consulting, says that Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT)'s Windows OS, and to a lesser extent Research In Motion Ltd. (RIM) (Nasdaq: RIMM; Toronto: RIM)'s BlackBerry 10, will likely be the beneficiary of the verdict as they're both relatively safe from the threat of Apple litigation.

"[The verdict] gives some of the diversity and decision making back to the carriers and OEMs," Wang says.

The operators have always given the handset makers and software providers requirements for handsets on their networks, but they couldn't force their hands on what to include on devices, Wang adds. Now, they'll likely be stricter about certain requirements and promote more diversity in their line up.

Wang says the new mentality will be, "Don’t just bring your portfolio with rectangular staples and reduce the feature set; do something different." And that goes for all OSes.

Of course, consumers in today's market want rectangular smartphones with big touch screens, so the line between differentiation and building the products that consumers will buy is a fine one. Indeed, that's what got Samsung tied up in litigation in the first place.

What's more, Android is the most popular OS for a number of wireless operators, including Verizon and especially T-Mobile USA . That may not change based on this trial, but in next six to 12 months, Android handset makers may have to look at less eloquent ways of implementing certain technologies to skirt patent issues, Wang says. In the next 12 to 18 months, he says, they'll start looking at new form factors like dual-screens and wireless accessories to stay out of the courtroom.

Nomura Securities analyst Richard Windsor points out that product delays and higher research and development expenses are likely to result for handset makers targeting the U.S., meaning that this process may take even longer than Wang suggests. In the meantime, it's a good window of opportunity for that third ecosystem to begin chipping away at Android's dominance. (See Microsoft Sets a Windows 8 Timeline and RIM Hopes BB10 Roadshow Will Wow Carriers .)

"As Android and Apple tear each other apart, Microsoft has been waiting in the wings and is in a very good position to move in and entice users to switch from Android to Microsoft, as we have already seen that user loyalty is low," Windsor writes in a research note.

While the verdict was delivered Friday, fallout from the trial is far from over. Samsung is working to overturn the verdict and, if that fails, will most likely appeal it. A preliminary hearing on injunctions on Samsung products based on the verdict is scheduled for Sept. 20.

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Reporter, Light Reading Mobile

Newest Comments First       Display in Chronological Order
Page 1 of 2 Next >
lanbrown
User Ranking
Wednesday August 29, 2012 3:04:13 PM

Nothing says that the sales would go down, but that the profits from the carriers would go up.  What if instead of a $300 subsidy, the carriers only did $100 or even $0?  They charge more for the device up front and keep the rate plans the same.  That could impact sales overall or if the brand loyalty was there, they would stay the same but not the price point is far higher.  The carriers would also make the marketing budget for the iPhone at $0 as well.  This puts the costs on Apple to continue the marketing push, which would hurt the margins that Apple current has.

mj42
User Ranking
Wednesday August 29, 2012 2:58:54 PM
no ratings

The carriers have the power to make Apple “Think Different” in what they are doing.

I'm not sure about that. I think millions of iPhone users are more loyal to their phone choice than the provider that delivers the service. I think Apple has flipped that relationship between carrier and device manufacturer.

lanbrown
User Ranking
Tuesday August 28, 2012 5:05:56 PM

I totally disagree.  Apple and Samsung have a supply contract; you don’t think that there aren’t prices listed in there?  In the past Apple has been known to go to a manufacturer and Apple would have the prices set into the contract and by doing so, when Apple started to sell large volumes, they were protected under contract while the other manufacturers found higher pricing.  This is exactly what Apple did with NAND flash.  When the contract is up, it is a different story though.  Samsung raising the prices too high and Apple might walk to a different supplier entirely.  Then Samsung lost the verdict and a customer.

 

While Apple is trying to distance itself from Google, is that wise to try to sue Google?  Google could easily fire back.  The iPhone doesn’t have Adobe Flash, it of course is being removed from currently released Android devices.  What if Google said we will only support WebM and Adobe Flash?  WebM is in 2.3.3 and higher.  Google could also play with the codecs that YouTube supports and say pick three and all three are not supported by the iPhone.

 

Also, if Apple went after Google and Microsoft, what do you think the carriers are going to think?  The carriers have the power to make Apple “Think Different” in what they are doing.  If the carriers want more than just Android and iOS and Apple is going to hurt that possibility, the carriers could make the iPhone a lot less attractive.

chuckj
User Ranking
Tuesday August 28, 2012 4:18:00 PM
no ratings

Let me go a step further, Apple and Samsung boxing match was set up so Samsung would take a dive, in order to set the precedence so Apple could go after Google and Microsoft.   What ever royalty Apple charges Samsung will come out of the Apple supply chain so in effect this is a wash for both parties.

lanbrown
User Ranking
Tuesday August 28, 2012 1:14:11 PM

Yep, Samsung is an Apple supplier and it is more than just the A5.  Samsung can’t do anything like not sell to Apple as they do have a contract.  Nothing keeps Samsung from raising the prices in future contracts though.  Obviously Apple doesn’t want to leave Samsung otherwise they would have.

lanbrown
User Ranking
Tuesday August 28, 2012 1:11:17 PM

AT&T did give the full backing to Microsoft and Nokia.  AT&T spent more marketing money on the Lumia 900 than any other phone in their history.  AT&T spent between $150 million and $200 million on marketing and they sold 300,000 Lumia 900’s.  Their total marketing budget is $450 million, so at least 1/3 of that was for a single handset.  How is that not giving a “real chance” to WP?  The iPhone was given $101 million.  If we use the low end amount ($150 million), AT&T spent $500 for every Lumia 900 sold in order to sell it.  The ROI was very poor and did hardly anything to increase activations.  That money would have been better off spent elsewhere.  BTW, that $500 didn’t include the subsidy either, so add another $200 to $300 on it.  So AT&T spent $800 per device to move the Lumia 900.  That doesn’t even include the marketing money from Microsoft or Nokia.  WP was never the answer and will never be the answer.  The consumer has voted again and again and it is not for WP.  Microsoft is throwing huge sums of money at WP, care t guess what happens when they stop?  Developers will be leaving as right now, Microsoft is essentially paying them to stay.  So they only develop as it is easy money, when the money dries up, they won’t be sticking around.  A successful ecosystem requires consumers and developers.  The consumers are not there and the developers are paid to be there.

http://www.lightreading.com/blog.asp?doc_id=222897

lanbrown
User Ranking
Tuesday August 28, 2012 12:58:57 PM

“"As Android and Apple tear each other apart, Microsoft has been waiting in the wings and is in a very good position to move in and entice users to switch from Android to Microsoft, as we have already seen that user loyalty is low," Windsor writes in a research note.”

 

It apparently isn’t “low” enough for people to switch to WP.  All the marketing hasn’t really helped their market share at all and the volume hasn’t changed all that much either.  With WP8 coming out and all existing users getting the shaft, the limited customer base they had all got burned in the process.  Why they are even bothering to still sell them right now is beyond me.  Microsoft will recompile the existing apps to work with WP8 and any apps made for WP8 will not run on WP7.  What apps will developers code for?  Yep, WP8.  Also, where is the WP8 SDK?  Yep, not available yet and when are they going to start selling?  Not a way to encourage growth of ecosystem; slash and burn the current users and then don’t provide the tools to the developers for the new platform in a timely fashion.

Dan Jones
User Ranking
Tuesday August 28, 2012 10:57:09 AM
no ratings

Heh, doesn't Samsung fab the A5 chip for Apple for example?

chuckj
User Ranking
Tuesday August 28, 2012 9:31:48 AM
no ratings
By the time thes telco dinosaurs wake up apple and samsung will have settled. Apple supply chain needs Samsung.
bergea
User Ranking
Monday August 27, 2012 7:05:18 PM
no ratings

Mobile operators need to take bold steps to benefit from the Apple-Samsung verdict.  Carriers have relied on devices as the interface to innovation, but only Verizon Wireless has taken Android and made it their own 'Droid' brand.  This effort will be set back six-months as the Android community adjusts its development plans to eliminate any possible duplicated features and user interfaces. 

With Apple's victory, now is the time for operators to take the lead by cultivating competitive alternatives.  AT&T and others need to give Microsoft and Nokia a real chance with Lumia and Windows 8. Same thing with RIM’s new BlackBerrys and BB10.  Carriers need to stop driving from the Back Seat!

http://www.lightreading.com/blog.asp?blog_sectionid=1112&doc_id=224232&

Page 1 of 2 Next >
The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
Mobile CON Preview