Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

News Analysis  

Limelight Shares Rise on Patent Ruling

June 29, 2007 |

Limelight Networks Inc. shareholders breathed a huge sigh of relief after the content delivery network (CDN) received a positive ruling in the patent infringement lawsuit filed against it by competitor Akamai Technologies Inc..

As a result, shares in Limelight rose $4.21 (27.04%) to $19.78 on the day, after touching an all-time low of $15.13 earlier in the trading session.

Robert Stimson, analyst at W.R. Hambrecht & Co., believes the stock rose on "a lot of short covering," after U.S. District Court judge Rya Zobel issued a preliminary ruling in the case.

According to Stimson, the court rejected the notion that Akamai could patent the way files were delivered over the Internet.

"What happened was Akamai was trying to patent the process, as opposed to its technology," Stimson said. "And the judge said, 'That's not a process you can patent.' "

That decision touched off a 20 percent jump in the stock price shortly after 2 p.m., when news of the ruling became public. Stimson believes much of this jump came after short sellers that had expected a negative ruling by the court were forced to cover their positions.

Expectations of a negative ruling were possibly exacerbated by a research note issued yesterday by Cowen and Co.. analyst Tom Watts. In that note, Watts quoted UCLA law professor and patent expert Doug Lichtman as saying Akamai had an 80 to 85 percent likelihood of winning the patent suit. (See Limelight Dims on Patent Worries.)

Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. analyst Colby Synesael believes Limelight stock was also being unfairly penalized due to the patent litigation. "With the Vonage and Verizon litigation, there's a fear that patents are becoming more important."

"Now that we have some clarity on the issue," Synesael says, Limelight's stock can trade at a fair value.

— Ryan Lawler, Reporter, Light Reading



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
Related Content
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured