& cplSiteName &

SDN's Killer App: More Network Control

Phil Harvey
The Philter
Phil Harvey
3/21/2013
50%
50%

ANAHEIM, Calif. -- OFC/NFOEC 2013 -- Everyone here has a software-defined networking (SDN) story. They all seem to point to a future of simpler networks that, with the help of virtualization, are much easier to control. But how hard will network equipment vendors really work for that goal when they have huge installed bases of routers and switches to protect? The status quo for those firms commands bigger margins now than if all or part of their networking functions were suddenly being handled on standard servers. Stanford University professor Nick McKeown says a lot of the vendors that say they're on board with SDN are only adding more code to support SDN-like interfaces and functions to specialized control planes inside of vertically integrated, proprietary routers and switches and gateways. In the hallways, after his plenary talk here, he was even more fired up. "I'm feeling sorry for the service providers who have to wade through that garbage," McKeown says. SDN, if done correctly, doesn't change the functionality of the network -- it moves those functions around. And, when the transport network's control and forwarding plane are separated, innovation can happen more quickly and less expensively, McKeown says. When I pressed him for a real-life application that could be the result of the simpler networks that SDN promises, he didn't disappoint. "You know how you have network neutrality now," he asked. "What if the customer could flip it around and tell the service provider: 'I'd like to give preference in my home network to Netflix.'" It would be interesting to see a service provider offering its network as a service and trusting its customers to provision network tasks via some portal or app that controls some virtual abstraction of its physical network. Indeed, it'd be nice to be billed for what you provision and use on that network, not just for the privilege of connecting to it and hardly using it. The general idea of a more services-oriented and software-defined telco is appealing. Some optical networking vendors here are getting on board with discussions to see how SDN-enabler OpenFlow will work in optical networks. McKeown, in his plenary presentation slides, says that SDN will get to simpler, more innovative networks, but first the big router and switch makers have to agree to get out of the way: "Networks will be in service of the owner, the operator, the customer and the application rather than just the high-margin vendor." — Phil Harvey, Editor, Light Reading

(15)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
dwx
50%
50%
dwx,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/22/2013 | 5:14:35 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
I agree. -áA provider I worked for allowed customers to change their WAN Frame-Relay BW via a web portal 8 years ago now. -á It also allowed Ethernet connected customers to turn up new VLANs between sites within a pre-built VPLS. -á Of course this required proprietary tools to do so, but I don't think that changes with OpenFlow at all. -áAre service providers going to allow a customer to turn up a pipe to Netflix at a whim which then provisions network resources on intermediate devices? -áUnlikely. -á And that isn't even bringing in security ramifications for devices which carry sensitive traffic like PCI data, which they do today. -á
mark-r
50%
50%
mark-r,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 10:59:32 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
Network as a service a new thing? What would you call, say, a classical wide-area-network (WAN) service by a network service provider to a multi-sited enterprise or ASP customer, to connect the customer's sites (offices/data centers/POPs) and external network access points? What new does SDN/OF enable?

E.g. if the classical WAN service is packet-layer transparent, the customer equipment (whatever they are, even custom built) will be in full control of the WAN service. The network SP does not need SDN/OF for that. How the customer manages its own systems interconnected by the WAN service is up to the customer (within what is supported by the customer premise technologies, which, as mentioned, can even be proprietary if needed).

What we need is better service layering architecture, not more control by itself or new protocols (much can be accomplished by less rigid, smarter use of existing protocols).
dig_deeper
50%
50%
dig_deeper,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 8:31:05 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
Parsimony, if you read my comment again, you will see that I referred to OpenFlow and how Nick and team advocated so much for OpenFlow as the savior and driver for capex reduction for top of the rack and other switching and routing equipment. -áThats was a big mistake.

Openflow would never be able to provide that capex reduction value proposition that got pitched by them for many years and drove ridiculous an wasted R&D investments on OpenFlow.-á
Phil Harvey
50%
50%
Phil Harvey,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 8:18:17 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
-áThat's why I'm careful to point out that even though folks are discussing SDN, what they're really talking about is the idea of service providers being able to offer the network as a service. That's not happening now but it could, as you point out.
febi85
50%
50%
febi85,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 7:49:29 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
Verizon uses ForCES and it deployed in the field. I agree it has less interest, but some showing interest to it and many turning towards it,
Parsimony in Networking
50%
50%
Parsimony in Networking,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 7:46:17 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
Nice association fallacy, but ultimately spoken like someone who hasn't actually thought much about this problem, and who certainly hasn't actually implemented one of these protocols. -á:)-á

No I don't think that the ~20 RFCs that make up the core internet protocol suite are simple, especially in composition. -á-á

But that doesn't make abstract-ámodeling-á/ negotiation of arbitrary forwarding hardware any simpler either.-á
Parsimony in Networking
100%
0%
Parsimony in Networking,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 7:35:54 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
dig_deeper: -áI'm not sure I agree that Nick has pointed the "whole industry in the wrong direction". -áI do believe that SDN in general and OF specifically,-áshoddily-ádesigned protocol that it is, are ENORMOUSLY over hyped. -áI also think it's likely that OF will, after the bubble bursts (or gradually deflates), be relegated to the protocol graveyard along with COPS and GSMP.-á

Having said that, I think that Nick, or rather, Scott and Nick, have opened up a very interesting area of inquiry. -á

Saying that OF is the one SDN protocol to rule them all, and the ultimate culmination of the SDN concept, is obviously ridiculous (I put this down to an aggressive ONF marketing campaign; that IS what they do after all). -áSaying that SDN itself has no value is almost equally absurd.
Parsimony in Networking
50%
50%
Parsimony in Networking,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 7:26:00 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
Interesting... -áAs much as I like the people who work on ForCES, and believe that their design is more mature than OFs, they have zero vendor adoption AFAIK and almost no customer interest. -á
buraglio
50%
50%
buraglio,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 7:11:00 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
The ONF isn't *totally* transparent. -áFollowing the WGs is much easier but even then that is not enough. -á"Vendor agnostic forwarding abstraction is all OpenFlow is." is one of the most elegant descriptions of OpenFlow I've heard, ever. -áThere are certainly ways to accomplish many of the tasks but most of those-ámechanisms, while possibly well documented,-áare clunky at best. -áProgrammatically-áadapting the network in a proactive manner is one of the huge advantages that OpenFlow brings to the table and large entities are going to embrace it. -áMaybe not now, but they will. -á-áIs it scary to the network vendors? -áAbsolutely. -áWas it productized too early? -áMaybe. -áIs it going away? -áHighly doubtful.-á
Was dynamic routing scary when it was originally deployed? -áYup. -áNow it's the norm. -á
dig_deeper
50%
50%
dig_deeper,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/21/2013 | 7:06:24 PM
re: SDN's Killer App: More Network Control
Brent, Please enlighten us why only a "vendor agnostic" solution is required to -áprovide on-demand bandwidth for netflix, as asked by you? -áYou are confusing two different things. -áTo provide on-demand bandwidth for netflix, you simply need a programmatic way to configure the existing network equipment. -á -áIt's a network orchestration problem, and there are practical ways to accomplish it.

If configuration level APIs are provided on top of existing equipment, it provides the agility of quick re-configuration and programmability. -áWith open REST APIs available, the orchestrator can be from a 3rd party, making the automation and orchestration piece "vendor agnostic"The "vendor agnostic" argument for Openflow is what people use for cost reduction of networking equipment, which is close to hallucination.-á
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from The Philter
There's an interesting tension between how much SDN can benefit service providers and how it could threaten their established businesses
OneAPI may provide developers a reason to build apps and content for networks, not just mobile operating systems
Ericsson CEO Hans Vestberg defends his company's managed services deals and says he'd rather invest in R&D than make expensive acquisitions
Use our message boards to share photos from your Barcelona experience this week
From The Founder
The time has come for a telecom app store to save the industry.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Documentaries
BCE 2017: Intel's Take on Network Transformation

5|24|17   |     |   (0) comments


In this BCE 2017 keynote, Lynn Comp discusses Intel's vision for areas such as analytics, automation and service assurance. For more videos and BCE coverage, see http://www.lightreading.com/bce.asp.
LRTV Documentaries
Order From Chaos: The Steve Saunders BCE Keynote

5|24|17   |   17:27   |   (0) comments


Kicking off BCE 2017, Light Reading founder Steve Saunders lays blame for NFV's slow ramp-up and urges telecom to return to old-fashioned standards building and interoperability testing.
Think of this as the video sequel to the recent columns he's written about NFV and the prospect of a telecom app store. (See

LRTV Documentaries
Service Provider Panel: Partnering in the Digital Era

5|22|17   |     |   (0) comments


Coopetition has always been part of telecom, but the ecosphere now includes data centers, vendors, apps developers, cloud service providers and Internet content providers. This BCE 2017 panel explores the new attitudes among network operators as to the value and variety of ...
LRTV Interviews
Site Demo: AT&T's IoT Flow Platform

5|19|17   |   04:25   |   (0) comments


At AT&T's R&D center in Tel Aviv, Israel, project leader Eyal Segev talks about the operator's Flow platform and how it helps to prototype IoT applications.
LRTV Documentaries
Agent of Change: A Q&A With AT&T's John Donovan

5|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


Carol Wilson talks with the man leading AT&T's transformation efforts about the challenge of change.
LRTV Documentaries
BCE Service Provider Panel: The New Business Realities

5|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


For virtualization to happen, the telecom industry first has to grapple with key functional aspects of SDN and NFV that need to be universal, such as onboarding of virtualized network functions and federation of software-defined networks.
LRTV Interviews
BCE Service Provider Keynote: CenturyLink

5|16|17   |   22:32   |   (0) comments


Aamir Hussain leads the Product Development and Technology organization at CenturyLink, which includes the company's information technology function. He is an experienced senior technology executive with more than 25 years of proven success in the implementation of global technology operations, operationalization of complex technology, infrastructures and business ...
LRTV Interviews
CenturyLink CTO on Transformation

5|16|17   |   7:43   |   (0) comments


The 80-year-old telco has already gone through several transformations, including every time it made an acquisition, but its purchase of Level 3 coupled with changes in technology and customer expectations necessitates its biggest transformation yet.
LRTV Documentaries
Light Reading Hall of Fame 2017

5|15|17   |   5:05   |   (1) comment


Find out who made it into Light Reading's Hall of Fame this year.
LRTV Interviews
Site Visit: AT&T's Tel Aviv R&D Center

5|15|17   |   09:58   |   (1) comment


Nir Shalom, general manager and VP of application development at AT&T Israel, talks about the key service developments undertaken at the AT&T R&D facility in Tel Aviv and how the team there has adopted new ways of working.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Act on Your Intelligence With Amdocs aia!

5|15|17   |     |   (0) comments


Amdocs CMO Gary Miles explains how communications service providers can seize the AI opportunity with Amdocs real-time digital intelligence platform.
LRTV Interviews
Logtel CEO: Making Sense of IoT

5|15|17   |   09:48   |   (0) comments


Jacques Bensimon, founder and CEO of Tel Aviv-based training and consultancy Logtel, talks about the need to make IoT more than just a buzzword.
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
AT&T's Donovan: Women Adapt Faster Than Men
Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms, 5/18/2017
Cities Clamor for More Clout at FCC
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/23/2017
Sonus & Genband Finally Combine to Form $745M Company
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 5/23/2017
What's Blocking 4K TV Today
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading, 5/22/2017
Fright Wigs & Cocktails: BCE 2017 in Pics
Mitch Wagner, Editor, Enterprise Cloud, 5/19/2017
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
One of the nice bits of my job (other than the teeny tiny salary, obviously) is that I get to pick and choose who I interview for this slot on the Light Reading home ...
TEOCO Founder and CEO Atul Jain talks to Light Reading Founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the challenges around cost control and service monetization in the mobile and IoT sectors.
Animals with Phones
What Brogrammers Look Like to the Rest of Us Click Here
Live Digital Audio

Playing it safe can only get you so far. Sometimes the biggest bets have the biggest payouts, and that is true in your career as well. For this radio show, Caroline Chan, general manager of the 5G Infrastructure Division of the Network Platform Group at Intel, will share her own personal story of how she successfully took big bets to build a successful career, as well as offer advice on how you can do the same. We’ll cover everything from how to overcome fear and manage risk, how to be prepared for where technology is going in the future and how to structure your career in a way to ensure you keep progressing. Chan, a seasoned telecom veteran and effective risk taker herself, will also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air.