& cplSiteName &

Carriers Say SDN Won't Save Capex

Carol Wilson
10/30/2013
50%
50%

SAN JOSE — Digital Disruption 2013 — Contrary to popular opinion, software-defined networking will not produce major capex savings for network operators, according to the two men responsible for virtualization strategy at CenturyLink and at Sprint.

Speaking on a Tuesday afternoon panel here on the impact of virtualization, James Feger, vice president, network strategy and development for CenturyLink, and Fred Feisullin, senior network architect in the CTO's office of Sprint, said there are advantages to deploying SDN and network functions virtualization (NFV), including getting new services to market quickly and, at some future point, opex savings. But capex savings isn't something they are expecting.

"When it comes to capex, I'd say it's a wash," Feger said. "Can I buy a virtual router today that is cheaper than buying a regular router? Sure. But transforming the telco environment into an SDN/NFV environment initially is going to cost more."

Telco central offices weren't built to house datacenter equipment and will need to be outfitted to do that, making the total cost of ownership (TCO) of a virtualized network about the same as today's capex budgets, he said.

In Sprint's case, the initial move to virtualization will take place in the evolved packet core, which isn't where most of the wireless network operator's costs lie, Feisullin explained.

"The core is a fraction of our capex, our costs are in the radio access network, mostly in radios, and those aren't going to be virtualized right now," he said. "The bigger gains are the new revenue sources that can be generated, then followed on by lower opex which will take much longer to be realized, then capex, maybe."

Like Feger, Feisullin sees higher opex associated with the initial deployment of new equipment to "get the infrastructure to work."

There may be more capex savings at the edge of the network and in CPE, such as set-top boxes, Feger said.

One further challenge in the early days of SDN/NFV is that creating virtual functions running on commercial off-the-shelf hardware creates complex operations challenges in the era when each function may be managed by a different siloed management system, Feger said.

New services acceleration and the ability to "fail fast" -- i.e., try something and then shut it down quickly if it doesn’t work -- are key advantages to a virtualized approach, according to both men. They balked at a suggestion from fellow panelist Jeff Edlund, CTO of CMS-Enterprise Solutions at Hewlett Packard, however, that network operators are willing to accept a lower level of overall reliability when they move more functions to COTS gear that is not built for the five nines of proprietary telecom boxes.

"It's not that we are tolerant of fewer nines or less reliability," Feger said. In a virtualized network, the reliability burden may be shared among multiple boxes that are logically connected rather being built into a more expensive individual component.

Service providers are willing to move ahead of standards development, however, because they see virtualization as important to future business models and may, in fact, be influencing standards by what they deploy and use, Feger said.

Feisullin sees "as many different strategies out there as there are service providers," when it comes to what to virtualize first and how much legacy gear continues to function for some time to come.

He also credited ETSI with getting the ball rolling on NFV, regardless of where its standards process ends up.

"ETSI is already a success because it has torn down walls between service providers and vendors and between vendors and that has shaved years the deployment cycles," Feisullin said. "Are we there yet? No, we have a long way to go."

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(18)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
TomNolle
50%
50%
TomNolle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
11/22/2013 | 9:24:11 AM
Re: Service providers may not benefit that much
I agree; there is a major risk that application awareness becomes stateful behavior that we already know doesn't scale in a cost-efficient way, particularly wrt opex.  I think that the SDN community will need to prove in an operations strategy, and to do that they'll also have to prove in a holistic approach to SDN--is it a complete strategy or a limited-area solution that still has to fit inside a bigger picture like IP.  If the former, how do we make it scale.  If the latter, how can it make enough of a difference to matter?
varkonyib
50%
50%
varkonyib,
User Rank: Light Beer
10/31/2013 | 4:18:26 AM
Service providers may not benefit that much
Centralization we had already with PDH/SDH, or ATM. Centralization of PNNI has failed miserably, although we still have some of those ATM switches in operations... :-)

The real issue would be a standard flow-through provisioning. But this is still far away. A standard interface between the switch and the controller does not help too much, when for each vendor's controller we need to develop to a different API.

At the end of the day all comes down to prices and technology architectures are secondary. SDH could not conquer the world because of pricing, not because it could not solve all technical problems. Recently, it has provided fully dynamical bandwidth control and common provisioning with other layers.

The real motivation for carriers is in OPEX savings in most cases. Managers are typically measured by EBITDA, and rarely on cash-flow. So CAPEX savings are virtual, and controllers never accept it, because it is too easy to falsify.

 

 

 

 
TomNolle
50%
50%
TomNolle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/30/2013 | 6:05:41 PM
Re: And the operators say...
I would hope that the IETF group thinks about some of the deeper issues (beyond simply deploying VNFs) but I can't say whether that will be what comes out.  If you look at service chaining, or any NFV element, it's kind of two-dimensional.  One dimension is how you deploy it and manage it, and the other is how the functionality itself has to be structured in order to achieve your service quality and availability goals.  It's not clear to me whether the IETF is fully engaged on either point but I think they do have a more general model for deployment and management than the NFV ISG does (because they have a broader scope of interest).
Dredgie
100%
0%
Dredgie,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/30/2013 | 5:38:27 PM
Re: Vendor messaging
I can't talk for data center SDN, but suppliers should absolutely talk capex reductions when it comes to carrier SDN (as described superbly by dwx*). With on-demand provisioning, you can dramatically increase path efficiencies and reduce oversubscription. Throw-in an additional low-end edge layer – a whitebox MPLS switch – you can even reduce the overall traffic hitting costly LERs. All while keeping your core optics and switches unchanged.

 

*Full disclosure: I have no idea who dwx is – but adding to my xmas card list!**

**Fuller disclosure: I don't actually have an xmas card list.
DOShea
50%
50%
DOShea,
User Rank: Blogger
10/30/2013 | 4:45:03 PM
Vendor messaging
I think there is at least some vendor messaging out there that mentions capex savings as a benefit, though I have never seen it mentioned prominently. Maybe some companies are hard-wired to list capex savings as a benefit of anything they do.
sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/30/2013 | 3:37:28 PM
Too early
With all due respect, I don't think we can predict whether SDN will produce major or moderate savings in capex (and/or in opex) for the simple reason that we're much too early in terms of adoption of SDN. There will be a shakeout/consolidation in this market and vendor pricing models will change as the market matures. Also, I would not be surprised if opex savings from SDN aren't as expected because a more dynamic network that supports an increasing number of apps and let's service providers tailor services on a per user basis could impact opex.
dwx
50%
50%
dwx,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/30/2013 | 3:30:19 PM
Re: That's their story and they're sticking to it
But Google is not using or have any plans on using open flow on their much larger backbone network. They are looking at hybrid central/distributed control using a PCE. The reality though is carriers have been using things like RSVP-TE to run links at 80-90 percent for 10+ years now on high capacity backbone networks. Where SDN may help those networks is at the edge and finding ways to control the spigots in and out of the network traditionally hard to control. Or optical+IP integration to turn up circuits dynamically or collapse layers. But you still need all the infrastructure in place to do those things, so capex isn't lowered dramatically. SDN adds some tweaks to that but the overall network doesn't change and the economics of using cheaper hardware in core networks doesn't really pan out. Like was said you are better off issuing a RFP and beating vendors up for better pricing.
gleavieboy
100%
0%
gleavieboy,
User Rank: Blogger
10/30/2013 | 3:03:32 PM
Re: That's their story and they're sticking to it
Good post Carol and kudos to the panelists.  But this shouldn't be a shocker.  ONF's original whitepaper on "SDN: The new norm for networks" doesn't sell Cap-Ex as the driver.  It's all about centralizing management and control, improving automation, increasing programmability, speeding innovation and offering more granular network control -> needs driven by today's east-west traffic patterns, big data, access from any device anywere etc...

Savvy operators also understand that SDN creates the flexible network architectures to support NFV (which in turn brings its own series of benefits). CFOs should be looking at SDN/NFV as a way of designing their networks for more contemporary needs - and establishing the elastic, programmable, scalable tenets required for future prosperity and competitiveness.  For those a tad more blinkered, there are plenty of vendors out there that will help them wring a few extra dollars out of cap-ex when doing like for like box replacements or upgrades. But work those deals now -because the vendor landscape for the new global network is going to look very different.
Dredgie
100%
0%
Dredgie,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/30/2013 | 2:59:47 PM
Re: And the operators say...
Re. your last point, Tom: Hence, I assume, the energy that is being put behind the Service Function Chaining (Network Service Chaining as was) initiative in the IETF. Momentum that surprised even the Area Chairs. 16 drafts in progress with only one BoF behind them. One more BoF at IETF88 (next week) before the charter is approved and working group status is achieved - but if the meeting was a few week later, even that might have been negated.
TomNolle
100%
0%
TomNolle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/30/2013 | 2:08:26 PM
And the operators say...
...at least at the meetings I've recently had, that capex reduction is not the compelling driver of either SDN or NFV.  They say operations savings and service velocity, which is what they said in the panel Carol is quoting.  The problem is that operators spend only about 17 cents of every revenue dollar on capex lf all kinds, and neither SDN nor NFV could hope to impact ALL of that.  As one operator said, they could bring about a 20% reduction in equipment spending by beating up Huawei.

The thing is, service velocity is as facile an answer as capex.  Velocity without direction isn't progress it's just movement.  Nothing is going to make bits profitable no matter how fast you can shuffle them or arrange them to support new stuff.  The "new stuff" has to be created above the network of today.  That means that a big part of "service velocity" has to come from assembling features into new services faster and more effectively.  That's not an SDN story, and it may not even be an NFV story.  If NFV is just about virtualizing existing network functions then it's not about creating truly new services.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
From The Founder
The time has come for a telecom app store to save the industry.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Documentaries
Service Provider Panel: Partnering in the Digital Era

5|22|17   |     |   (0) comments


Coopetition has always been part of telecom, but the ecosphere now includes data centers, vendors, apps developers, cloud service providers and Internet content providers. This BCE 2017 panel explores the new attitudes among network operators as to the value and variety of ...
LRTV Interviews
Site Demo: AT&T's IoT Flow Platform

5|19|17   |   04:25   |   (0) comments


At AT&T's R&D center in Tel Aviv, Israel, project leader Eyal Segev talks about the operator's Flow platform and how it helps to prototype IoT applications.
LRTV Documentaries
Agent of Change: A Q&A With AT&T's John Donovan

5|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


Carol Wilson talks with the man leading AT&T's transformation efforts about the challenge of change.
LRTV Documentaries
BCE Service Provider Panel: The New Business Realities

5|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


For virtualization to happen, the telecom industry first has to grapple with key functional aspects of SDN and NFV that need to be universal, such as onboarding of virtualized network functions and federation of software-defined networks.
LRTV Interviews
BCE Service Provider Keynote: CenturyLink

5|16|17   |   22:32   |   (0) comments


Aamir Hussain leads the Product Development and Technology organization at CenturyLink, which includes the company's information technology function. He is an experienced senior technology executive with more than 25 years of proven success in the implementation of global technology operations, operationalization of complex technology, infrastructures and business ...
LRTV Interviews
CenturyLink CTO on Transformation

5|16|17   |   7:43   |   (0) comments


The 50-year-old telco has already gone through several transformations, including every time it made an acquisition, but its purchase of Level 3 coupled with changes in technology and customer expectations necessitates its biggest transformation yet.
LRTV Documentaries
Light Reading Hall of Fame 2017

5|15|17   |   5:05   |   (1) comment


Find out who made it into Light Reading's Hall of Fame this year.
LRTV Interviews
Site Visit: AT&T's Tel Aviv R&D Center

5|15|17   |   09:58   |   (1) comment


Nir Shalom, general manager and VP of application development at AT&T Israel, talks about the key service developments undertaken at the AT&T R&D facility in Tel Aviv and how the team there has adopted new ways of working.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Act on Your Intelligence With Amdocs aia!

5|15|17   |     |   (0) comments


Amdocs CMO Gary Miles explains how communications service providers can seize the AI opportunity with Amdocs real-time digital intelligence platform.
LRTV Interviews
Logtel CEO: Making Sense of IoT

5|15|17   |   09:48   |   (0) comments


Jacques Bensimon, founder and CEO of Tel Aviv-based training and consultancy Logtel, talks about the need to make IoT more than just a buzzword.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Challenges of Mobile Banking Implementation

5|12|17   |     |   (0) comments


Kamal Quadir of bKash Limited explains the challenges and needs of implementing mobile banking in the Bangladesh market.
LRTV Interviews
Tel Aviv: A Hub of Innovation

5|10|17   |   07:58   |   (0) comments


Light Reading's Ray Le Maistre and Dan Allen discuss the technology innovation, food and amazing sights they witnessed during a recent trip to Israel.
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
BSS Is BS, Says KPN Tech Boss
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/16/2017
AT&T's Donovan: Women Adapt Faster Than Men
Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms, 5/18/2017
Verizon on M&A: Who Needs a Cableco?
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/17/2017
Standardization Needs Room for Innovation
Mitch Wagner, Editor, Enterprise Cloud, 5/17/2017
WiCipedia: LL Awards, Tech Mom Returnships & How The Post Gets the Ladies
Eryn Leavens, Special Features & Copy Editor, 5/19/2017
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
One of the nice bits of my job (other than the teeny tiny salary, obviously) is that I get to pick and choose who I interview for this slot on the Light Reading home ...
TEOCO Founder and CEO Atul Jain talks to Light Reading Founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the challenges around cost control and service monetization in the mobile and IoT sectors.
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Playing it safe can only get you so far. Sometimes the biggest bets have the biggest payouts, and that is true in your career as well. For this radio show, Caroline Chan, general manager of the 5G Infrastructure Division of the Network Platform Group at Intel, will share her own personal story of how she successfully took big bets to build a successful career, as well as offer advice on how you can do the same. We’ll cover everything from how to overcome fear and manage risk, how to be prepared for where technology is going in the future and how to structure your career in a way to ensure you keep progressing. Chan, a seasoned telecom veteran and effective risk taker herself, will also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air.