Light Reading
Just because SDN is better doesn't mean adoption will be easy.

3 Barriers to SDN Adoption

Mitch Wagner
7/2/2014
50%
50%

While SDN makes sense on technological merits, it faces major barriers to adoption. And those barriers aren't technical.

One major barrier to SDN adoption is cultural. Carrier network engineers are currently hardware operators. They deal with dedicated, physical boxes that need to be transported, hooked up, configured with a command-line interface and occasionally visited in situ. SDN will turn carrier networking upside-down; engineers will become software developers, configuring networks using graphical software and writing code in interactive development environments. The only time they'll get up on their feet is if they have treadmill desks.

The job of being a network operator will change. It requires a lot of retraining and redrawing the lines, circles, and boxes on the org chart. (See The Three Faces of SDN and SDN Faces a Human Hurdle .)

Which leads to the second barrier: Power politics. Many network engineers will be simply unable to make the transition to software networking, and they'll be out of work. People resist being put out of jobs. Even tougher for SDN advocates: Some of these people will be upper management who've built their careers around hardware-defined networks. Many of these people are going to see the shift to software networks as a threat to their position within the company. They see the transition to software networks as a death-struggle, and they'll fight against it with every iota of their being.

Sure, hardware-defined networking has its issues. But people whose job it is to solve problems have a strong vested interest in preserving those problems. (I wish I could remember who said that -- it's brilliant.) If your job is to clean the hair out of the shower drain, you're going to fight like a Klingon against any attempt to eliminate shower-drain-hair as a problem.

But what of the benefits? Software-defined networks are more easily maintained, less expensive in capex and opex (allegedly), and more flexible, permitting the deployment of new services faster to customers.

That all appears to be true, but it's difficult to prove -- which is the third barrier to SDN adoption. SDN exists down deep at the bottom of the network, while financial benefits become obvious high up in the application layers. SDN requires foundational network changes whose benefits are indirect and difficult to quantify immediately.

So what's an SDN advocate to do? Start small, deploying SDN in new services. Do fast projects with quick, demonstrable financial return. Enlist allies in the organization where you can find them, and do your best to navigate around opponents without confronting them.

NFV, often mentioned in the same breath as SDN, represents a way to get SDN in the back door of network operators. Virtualizing a network application like a load-balancer or firewall, particularly if it's customer premises equipment, can be a small, local project with immediate financial benefit. Do enough of those and somebody's going to see that virtualizing the underlying network architecture is a great idea too.

As to the managers and senior VPs who fight SDN as a threat to their survival: Some will come around, some will be proven wrong and sidelined, and for others, you may just have to wait for them to retire. Putting arsenic in their coffee, tempting though it may be, will get you the wrong kind of attention.

— Mitch Wagner, Circle me on Google+ Follow me on TwitterVisit my LinkedIn profileFollow me on Facebook, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading. Got a tip about SDN or NFV? Send it to wagner@lightreading.com.

(9)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SDNAT
50%
50%
SDNAT,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/10/2014 | 1:45:27 PM
SDN adoption barriers
As the article says, Yes, SDN make sense, it is inevitable in the future, and certainly brings lot of benefits. 

In my opinion, some of the key barriers are

1. Risk apetite for new technology:  SDN in general perceived to be for Data Centers. DC is where many of key enterprise apps are hosted. With SDN, multiple changes will be made for DC architecture from technology as well as from overall org perspective. All put together enterprises' perceived risk seems higher. 

2. Fear of unknown: Lack of knowledge about SDN among network engineers/operators/managers etc keeps them away from adopting sooner than later. 

3. Lack of standard: Since different vendors are offering different types of solutions for network agility but are all calling them as SDN the customers are confused and not sure which way the technology is heading. So, enterprises want to wait & watch mode.

4. Currently invested (paid off) network solution is working: Currently deployed network architecture and solution are working fine for the most part and business is functioning. So, no immediate urgency for adopting SDN solution. 

 

 
rvrambo
50%
50%
rvrambo,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/8/2014 | 1:00:54 PM
Re: Hyrbid
To be frank much better than the original article.  We need absolute and concrete proof of.

1. OPEX savings (  not slides  )

2. Scalability of the solutions to large carrier networks.

 

SDN adoption is by natute disruptive to the extent that it can effect the company earnings. So any higher ups of the publicly traded carrier networks would think multiple times before signing up on the dottted lines to approve.

Having said that, SDN adoption has to start at a small scale , may at the edge and prove itself  before it can get to core and/or complex services.

 

If you tell some one that, you can exactly the SAME thing using different set of tools with a great promise of the CAPEX but no OPEX to show for in the next 12-24 months.. that's a bound to fail or rejected at the highest levels.

 

For example, they said the same kind of things about reconfigurable optical transport few years back and we all know what happened.

 
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/3/2014 | 12:37:23 PM
Re: Hyrbid
Good points. Resistance to SDN isn't foolish, coming from people who demand proof it's ready for prime time before deploying it.
futurephil
50%
50%
futurephil,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 7:38:57 PM
Re: and now some specifics...
The word "here" is linked. That doesn't show up on this board, though.
VictorRBlake
50%
50%
VictorRBlake,
User Rank: Moderator
7/2/2014 | 5:03:20 PM
Re: Hyrbid
self editing here, I meant "serious problems" Gotta hate those autocorrect things...
sam masud
0%
100%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 4:01:59 PM
Re: Hyrbid
If a well understood and popular technology--Ethernet--took a fair amount of time to develop into a carrier-grade service, then we can expect SDN, which is far more complex, will take much longer to be established in carrier networks. But it will be deployed because its capex advantages are hard to ignore.
sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 3:58:06 PM
Re: and now some specifics...
Did you intend to provide a link in your post?
futurephil
50%
50%
futurephil,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 2:42:16 PM
and now some specifics...
To sort of pick up where this post leaves off, here are a couple of technical barriers that telcos really are talking about and some advice on overcoming them.
victorblake
100%
0%
victorblake,
User Rank: Lightning
7/2/2014 | 10:49:29 AM
Hyrbid
First -- I have to say that while you make great points about the challenges to adopting SDN, you do not point out all of the shortcomings of SDN and you exaggerate some of the "claims" or benefits of SDN. No matter how much the controllers do people are still going to have to put fiber or copper in the ground or up on poles. I'm pretty sure that won't be done by software. So I think you've neglected about 1/2 of the challenge of the telecom industry and by capex probably something like 80% to 90% of the capital cost of telecoms. Changing the routers, switches, and OSS to even 100% of SDN -- is perhaps like changing the transmission on a car from a mechanical transmission to a software controlled transmission (much as we did with electrical power control on solar race cars I used to work on). You do not eliminte the need for tires, a frame, and the rest of the "hardware" that makes for a car.

Second, like most technologies I think we are likely to see a hybrid approach where SDN will evolve by at first offering APIs into existing forwarding methods (like MPLS and VPLS VPNs) -- and then latter a variety of hyrbird approaches.

Third, even in the long run, SDN has series problems tha have not been addressed. Not the least of these is that centralized control is very very vulnerable -- in fact it is the exact opposite of IP's distributed architecture and would be subject to the same kind of vulnerability of any other centralized control scheme (like SS7). There's always the swing of the pendulum, but to think it will swing fully to centralized and stay there is to ignore all of telecom history.

While you make many great points, your article implies that senior telecom folks are resisting SDN because it is new or software. I don't think that's the case at all. They are resisting it because it has gaping holes, inconsistencies, immaturity, and -- not least of all because if they tried to build a 100% SDN network today -- they could not -- the products and technology just are not there yet. Despite what you think there are many very senior telecom execs with a strong background in CS -- who have taken the industry to where we are with advanced automation. The number of people required per (any measure such as Tbs) has been on a continuous decline. That's due to the efforts of the people you are claiming don't know about software.
More Blogs from Column
There are three important questions service providers need to address for in-market and out-of-market expansion.
Cablevision's new Freewheel WiFi service will offer 'unlimited data, talk and text' plus access to Cablevision hotspots for a smallish monthly fee, but is hotspot access worth the price?
Space Division Multiplexing (SDM) technologies could help relieve future bottlenecks in communications networks.
Small cells with advanced C-RAN capabilities create a new opportunity to meet wireless demand more economically and deliver the best possible user experience to subscribers.
To get real customer visibility and to consistently deliver a higher quality experience, MNOs must have access to real-time location awareness.
Flash Poll
From The Founder
It's clear to me that the communications industry is divided into two types of people, and only one is living in the real world.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Dr. Dong Sun Talks About Carriers' Digital Transformation & Huawei’s Telco OS

1|29|15   |   6:28   |   (0) comments


Dr. Dong Sun, Chief Architect of Digital Transformation Solutions at Huawei, discusses how telecom operators can become digital ecosystem enablers and deliver optimal user experiences that are in real-time, on-demand, all-online, DIY and social (ROADS).
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Chief Network Architect Talks about Network Experience & Operators’ Strategies

1|29|15   |   3:39   |   (0) comments


In the digital age, network experience has become the primary productivity especially for telecom operators. In this video, Wenshuan Dang, Huawei’s Chief Network Architect, discusses how carriers can tackle the challenge of infrastructure complexity in order to enhance business agility and improve user experience.
LRTV Documentaries
The Rise of Virtual CPE

1|27|15   |   01:38   |   (4) comments


As NFV strategies evolve from tests and trials to production telco networks, expect to hear a lot about virtual CPE (customer premises equipment) rollouts during 2015.
LRTV Documentaries
Optical Is Hot in 2015

1|23|15   |   01:56   |   (2) comments


Optical comms technology underpins the whole communications sector and there are some really hot trends set for 2015.
LRTV Custom TV
Policy Control in the Fast Lane

1|22|15   |   2:57   |   (0) comments


What's making policy control strategic in 2015 and beyond? Amdocs talks with Heavy Reading's Graham Finnie about the key factors driving change in the data services landscape. Find out what his policy management research reveals about the road ahead for policy control – and sign up for
LRTV Documentaries
Highlights From the 2020 Vision Executive Summit

1|21|15   |   4:33   |   (2) comments


In December 2014, Light Reading brought together telecom executives in Reykjavik, Iceland to discuss their vision for high-capacity networks through the end of the decade. The intimate, interactive meeting was set against the backdrop of Iceland's spectacular natural beauty. As one of the event's founding sponsors, Cisco's Doug Webster shared his company's ...
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei Pay-TV Partner Harmonic, Helping Carriers Accelerate 4K Video Deployment with Huawei

1|20|15   |   5:42   |   (1) comment


At IBC, Peter Alexander, Senior Vice President & CMO at Harmonic, speaks about the growing interest in pay-TV service and its branching into multiple devices.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Sony Marketing Director Olivier Bovis Discusses the Outlook for 4K and Cooperation With Huawei at IBC 2014

1|20|15   |   6:50   |   (0) comments


At IBC, Olivier Bovis, Marketing Director of Sony, speaks about the coming of the 4K era.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei Pay-TV Partner Envivio, Helping Carriers Accelerate 4K Video Deployment

1|20|15   |   2:57   |   (0) comments


At IBC, Olivier Bovis, Marketing Director of Sony, speaks about the coming of the 4K era.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Pay-TV's Networked Future

1|20|15   |   6:29   |   (0) comments


At IBC, Jeff Heynen, Principal Analyst at Infonetics, speaks about the future of the pay-TV industry and its transition.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Jeff Heynen: Distributed Access Will Help MSOs Compete in the Future

1|20|15   |   2:26   |   (0) comments


At IBC, Jeff Heynen, Principal Analyst at Infonetics, speaks about moving to distributed access and the future trend of cable business.
LRTV Interviews
Cisco Talks Transformation

1|20|15   |   13:02   |   (0) comments


In December 2014, Steve Saunders sat down with Cisco VP of Products & Solutions Marketing Doug Webster at Light Reading's 2020 Vision executive summit in Reykjavik, Iceland. They spoke about Cisco's approach to network virtualization as well as how service providers can begin to monetize high-capacity networks through the end of the decade.
Upcoming Live Events
February 5, 2015, Washington, DC
February 19, 2015, The Fairmont San Jose, San Jose, CA
March 17, 2015, The Cable Center, Denver, CO
April 14, 2015, The Westin Times Square, New York City, NY
May 12, 2015, Grand Hyatt, Denver, CO
May 13-14, 2015, The Westin Peachtree, Atlanta, GA
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
September 9-10, 2015, The Westin Galleria Dallas, Dallas, TX
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
November 11-12, 2015, The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
December 1, 2015, The Westin Times Square, New York City
December 2-3, 2015, The Westin Times Square, New York City
Infographics
Hot Topics
Google Continues Gigabit Expansion
Jason Meyers, Senior Editor, Gigabit Cities/IoT, 1/27/2015
Cablevision's New WiFi Try – Freewheeling Enough?
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 1/26/2015
Overture Builds on NFV Foundation
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 1/27/2015
Comcast Apologizes to 'A**hole' Brown
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 1/29/2015
NTT DoCoMo Takes on Retail Broadband
Robert Clark, 1/29/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Webinar Archive
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Weekly Executive Interview
Join us live for Light Reading's interview with Jay Samit, the newly appointed CEO of publicly traded SeaChange International Inc. With a resume that includes Sony, EMI, and Universal, Samit brings a reputation as an entrepreneur and a disruptor to his new role at the video solutions company. Hear what he has to say about the opportunities in video, as well as the outlook for cable, telco, OTT and mobile service providers.