& cplSiteName &

3 Barriers to SDN Adoption

Mitch Wagner

While SDN makes sense on technological merits, it faces major barriers to adoption. And those barriers aren't technical.

One major barrier to SDN adoption is cultural. Carrier network engineers are currently hardware operators. They deal with dedicated, physical boxes that need to be transported, hooked up, configured with a command-line interface and occasionally visited in situ. SDN will turn carrier networking upside-down; engineers will become software developers, configuring networks using graphical software and writing code in interactive development environments. The only time they'll get up on their feet is if they have treadmill desks.

The job of being a network operator will change. It requires a lot of retraining and redrawing the lines, circles, and boxes on the org chart. (See The Three Faces of SDN and SDN Faces a Human Hurdle .)

Which leads to the second barrier: Power politics. Many network engineers will be simply unable to make the transition to software networking, and they'll be out of work. People resist being put out of jobs. Even tougher for SDN advocates: Some of these people will be upper management who've built their careers around hardware-defined networks. Many of these people are going to see the shift to software networks as a threat to their position within the company. They see the transition to software networks as a death-struggle, and they'll fight against it with every iota of their being.

Sure, hardware-defined networking has its issues. But people whose job it is to solve problems have a strong vested interest in preserving those problems. (I wish I could remember who said that -- it's brilliant.) If your job is to clean the hair out of the shower drain, you're going to fight like a Klingon against any attempt to eliminate shower-drain-hair as a problem.

But what of the benefits? Software-defined networks are more easily maintained, less expensive in capex and opex (allegedly), and more flexible, permitting the deployment of new services faster to customers.

That all appears to be true, but it's difficult to prove -- which is the third barrier to SDN adoption. SDN exists down deep at the bottom of the network, while financial benefits become obvious high up in the application layers. SDN requires foundational network changes whose benefits are indirect and difficult to quantify immediately.

So what's an SDN advocate to do? Start small, deploying SDN in new services. Do fast projects with quick, demonstrable financial return. Enlist allies in the organization where you can find them, and do your best to navigate around opponents without confronting them.

NFV, often mentioned in the same breath as SDN, represents a way to get SDN in the back door of network operators. Virtualizing a network application like a load-balancer or firewall, particularly if it's customer premises equipment, can be a small, local project with immediate financial benefit. Do enough of those and somebody's going to see that virtualizing the underlying network architecture is a great idea too.

As to the managers and senior VPs who fight SDN as a threat to their survival: Some will come around, some will be proven wrong and sidelined, and for others, you may just have to wait for them to retire. Putting arsenic in their coffee, tempting though it may be, will get you the wrong kind of attention.

— Mitch Wagner, Circle me on Google+ Follow me on TwitterVisit my LinkedIn profileFollow me on Facebook, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading. Got a tip about SDN or NFV? Send it to wagner@lightreading.com.

(9)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
User Rank: Light Beer
7/10/2014 | 1:45:27 PM
SDN adoption barriers
As the article says, Yes, SDN make sense, it is inevitable in the future, and certainly brings lot of benefits. 

In my opinion, some of the key barriers are

1. Risk apetite for new technology:  SDN in general perceived to be for Data Centers. DC is where many of key enterprise apps are hosted. With SDN, multiple changes will be made for DC architecture from technology as well as from overall org perspective. All put together enterprises' perceived risk seems higher. 

2. Fear of unknown: Lack of knowledge about SDN among network engineers/operators/managers etc keeps them away from adopting sooner than later. 

3. Lack of standard: Since different vendors are offering different types of solutions for network agility but are all calling them as SDN the customers are confused and not sure which way the technology is heading. So, enterprises want to wait & watch mode.

4. Currently invested (paid off) network solution is working: Currently deployed network architecture and solution are working fine for the most part and business is functioning. So, no immediate urgency for adopting SDN solution. 


User Rank: Light Beer
7/8/2014 | 1:00:54 PM
Re: Hyrbid
To be frank much better than the original article.  We need absolute and concrete proof of.

1. OPEX savings (  not slides  )

2. Scalability of the solutions to large carrier networks.


SDN adoption is by natute disruptive to the extent that it can effect the company earnings. So any higher ups of the publicly traded carrier networks would think multiple times before signing up on the dottted lines to approve.

Having said that, SDN adoption has to start at a small scale , may at the edge and prove itself  before it can get to core and/or complex services.


If you tell some one that, you can exactly the SAME thing using different set of tools with a great promise of the CAPEX but no OPEX to show for in the next 12-24 months.. that's a bound to fail or rejected at the highest levels.


For example, they said the same kind of things about reconfigurable optical transport few years back and we all know what happened.

Mitch Wagner
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/3/2014 | 12:37:23 PM
Re: Hyrbid
Good points. Resistance to SDN isn't foolish, coming from people who demand proof it's ready for prime time before deploying it.
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 7:38:57 PM
Re: and now some specifics...
The word "here" is linked. That doesn't show up on this board, though.
User Rank: Moderator
7/2/2014 | 5:03:20 PM
Re: Hyrbid
self editing here, I meant "serious problems" Gotta hate those autocorrect things...
sam masud
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 4:01:59 PM
Re: Hyrbid
If a well understood and popular technology--Ethernet--took a fair amount of time to develop into a carrier-grade service, then we can expect SDN, which is far more complex, will take much longer to be established in carrier networks. But it will be deployed because its capex advantages are hard to ignore.
sam masud
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 3:58:06 PM
Re: and now some specifics...
Did you intend to provide a link in your post?
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 2:42:16 PM
and now some specifics...
To sort of pick up where this post leaves off, here are a couple of technical barriers that telcos really are talking about and some advice on overcoming them.
User Rank: Lightning
7/2/2014 | 10:49:29 AM
First -- I have to say that while you make great points about the challenges to adopting SDN, you do not point out all of the shortcomings of SDN and you exaggerate some of the "claims" or benefits of SDN. No matter how much the controllers do people are still going to have to put fiber or copper in the ground or up on poles. I'm pretty sure that won't be done by software. So I think you've neglected about 1/2 of the challenge of the telecom industry and by capex probably something like 80% to 90% of the capital cost of telecoms. Changing the routers, switches, and OSS to even 100% of SDN -- is perhaps like changing the transmission on a car from a mechanical transmission to a software controlled transmission (much as we did with electrical power control on solar race cars I used to work on). You do not eliminte the need for tires, a frame, and the rest of the "hardware" that makes for a car.

Second, like most technologies I think we are likely to see a hybrid approach where SDN will evolve by at first offering APIs into existing forwarding methods (like MPLS and VPLS VPNs) -- and then latter a variety of hyrbird approaches.

Third, even in the long run, SDN has series problems tha have not been addressed. Not the least of these is that centralized control is very very vulnerable -- in fact it is the exact opposite of IP's distributed architecture and would be subject to the same kind of vulnerability of any other centralized control scheme (like SS7). There's always the swing of the pendulum, but to think it will swing fully to centralized and stay there is to ignore all of telecom history.

While you make many great points, your article implies that senior telecom folks are resisting SDN because it is new or software. I don't think that's the case at all. They are resisting it because it has gaping holes, inconsistencies, immaturity, and -- not least of all because if they tried to build a 100% SDN network today -- they could not -- the products and technology just are not there yet. Despite what you think there are many very senior telecom execs with a strong background in CS -- who have taken the industry to where we are with advanced automation. The number of people required per (any measure such as Tbs) has been on a continuous decline. That's due to the efforts of the people you are claiming don't know about software.
More Blogs from Column
Why advanced data analytics are the future for streaming video services.
5G could ride the traditional wireless hype cycle, or – quite possibly – break the chain, suggests Nokia's North American CTO.
NFV feels like it's going nowhere fast, suggests Napatech's Dan Joe Barry.
The NG-PON2 standard is the key to the future of ultra-broadband, believes Calix's Alan DiCicco.
Amazing new 5G innovations are coming below 6GHz -- it's not just about mmWave.
Light Reading’s Upskill U is a FREE, interactive, online educational resource that delivers must-have education on themes that relate to the overall business transformation taking place in the communications industry.
Wednesday, October 26, 1:00PM EDT
Security: Tackling DDoS
Gary Sockrider, Principal Security Technologist, Arbor Networks
Friday, October 28, 1:00PM EDT
Security: The Plusses and Minuses of Open Source Software
Nick Feamster, Acting Director, Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University
Wednesday, November 16, 1:00PM EST
SDN 101
John Isch, Practice Director, Network & Voice, Orange Business Services
Friday, November 18, 1:00PM EST
SDN & Open Source
Christopher W. Rice, Senior Vice President of AT&T Labs, Domain 2.0 Architecture and Design
in association with:
From The Founder
Light Reading today starts a new voyage as part of a larger Enterprise.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Custom TV
Next-Generation Technology Beyond DOCSIS 3.1

10|20|16   |     |   (0) comments

At SCTE 2016, Huawei's Liu Jianhua speaks with Alan Breznick for an exclusive interview.
LRTV Custom TV
Hybrid Video Solutions to Change TV, Change Future

10|20|16   |     |   (0) comments

At SCTE 2016, Huawei's Ian Locke speaks with Alan Breznick for an exclusive interview.
LRTV Custom TV
Huawei Future-Oriented Giga Coax Network

10|20|16   |     |   (0) comments

At SCTE 2016, Huawei's Allen Wang speaks with Alan Breznick for an exclusive interview.
LRTV Custom TV
Huawei at SCTE 2016

10|20|16   |     |   (0) comments

Join Alan Breznick of Light Reading and take a sneak peek at the Huawei booth at SCTE 2016.
LRTV Custom TV
Assuring Network Quality in a Rapidly Changing Environment

10|20|16   |     |   (0) comments

As the rate of change and complexity increases in agile networks, the importance of introducing DevOps methodologies for integrating active test and assurance solutions throughout the full service lifecycle becomes critical to ensure that customers are experiencing the service quality they demand. The industry landscape is changing, and software-based test and ...
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
A10 Networks on Service Providers' Industry Needs

10|20|16   |     |   (0) comments

Light Reading's Steve Saunders hears how A10 enables service providers to accelerate, secure and optimize their application delivery to drive down costs, enhance service availability, and better respond to customer requirements, so they can improve customer satisfaction, monetize their network, and grow revenues.
LRTV Custom TV
New NFV Use Cases for Cable TV

10|19|16   |     |   (0) comments

A large number of NFV use cases are focused on the enterprise domain, looking at virtualization of customer-premises equipment (CPE). To date, there has been little focus on the use cases and business case for virtualization of the video content delivery networks required to deliver unicast and streaming video to consumers. Amdocs commissioned Analysys Mason to ...
Women in Comms Introduction Videos
Meet the Future Workforce: New Faces, Expectations & Motivations

10|19|16   |   5:33   |   (1) comment

Millennials and their younger peers, Gen Z, expect more out of their network and more out of their work. Intel's Lynn Comp shares how the industry can prepare for this new generation of workers.
LRTV Custom TV
ZTE Global Services User Congress 2016 Highlights

10|19|16   |     |   (0) comments

ZTE held its 2nd Global Service User Conference in Dusseldorf on October 13-14. Representatives from network operators, leading industry analysts and ZTE senior expertsattended the event, exploring the best practice in managed services and the vision to transform network operations into the operations center of the future (OpCF) in the software-defined networking ...
LRTV Custom TV
Cliff Grossner on Cloud & Network Synergy From Carrier Service

10|18|16   |     |   (0) comments

Local carriers offer the collaborated cloud and network service that benefits from their understanding of the regulations operating in different vertical markets.
In this interview, Cliff Grossner from IHS Technology talks about how this advanced service can support business agility and flexibility.
LRTV Custom TV
VeEX: Live from SCTE Cable-Tec Expo 2016

10|17|16   |     |   (0) comments

Cyrille Morelle, VeEX's President and CEO, talks with Light Reading's Alan Breznick live from the SCTE Cable-Tec Expo 2016. They discuss DOCSIS 3.1 technology, deployments and early lessons learned. New products on display include the CX350s-D3.1, CX380s-D3.1, CX310, AT2500-3G, FX150 OTDR and MTT WiFI Air Expert.
LRTV Custom TV
Smith Micro's Carrier-Grade WiFi Component

10|17|16   |     |   (0) comments

Join Carol Wilson of Light Reading as she interviews the CTO of Smith Micro, Dave Sperling.
Upcoming Live Events
November 3, 2016, The Montcalm Marble Arch, London
November 30, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York City
December 1, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
December 6-8, 2016, The Westin Excelsior, Rome
May 16-17, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
Attacks Have Major Internet Sites on the Ropes
Brian Santo, Senior editor, Test & Measurement / Components, Light Reading, 10/21/2016
Trump: Dump AT&T/TW & Comcast/NBC
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading, 10/24/2016
T-Mobile: AT&T & TW Means Ma Bell Not Focused on Mobile
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 10/24/2016
Layer3 TV Comes to Town, Hints at Future
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 10/21/2016
Verizon Wants More Data on Yahoo Breach
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading, 10/20/2016
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
There's no question that, come 2020, 5G technology will turn the world's conception of what mobile networking is on its head. Within the world of 5G development, Dr. ...
Animals with Phones
'Oh, Were You Looking for This?' Click Here
'I was just playing some games...'
Live Digital Audio

A vital part of increasing the number of women in comms is transforming the ways companies can support and empower women. While progressive company policies that support both men and women in achieving work-life balance are a step in the right direction, creating a company culture that supports those policies can at times be more challenging.

During this show, we'll talk to Lynn Comp, Senior Director of Industry and Sales Enabling (ISE) in the Network Platforms Group at Intel, about why those challenges exist and how companies can overcome them. She'll provide insight into how Intel has worked to create a culture that supports work-life balance, and provide steps and guidance for other companies wishing to do the same. We will also leave plenty of time to get your questions answered live on the air.