Light Reading
CenturyLink and Masergy are both interested in Distributed NFV but their approaches are somewhat different.

Two Faces of Distributed NFV

Carol Wilson
3/13/2014
100%
0%

In the era of virtualization, greater distinctions may develop between carriers and the services they offer as network operators adopt unique approaches to common service delivery concepts.

One example of how different priorities can influence deployments can already be seen in the instance of Distributed NFV, one of the proofs of concept being considered by the ETSI NFV Industry Specifications Group (ISG).

The idea of Distributed NFV was first publicized by RAD Data Communications Ltd. -- not that surprising as it manufactures customer premises gear. But as a PoC, it is a multi-vendor effort including Cyan Inc. , which is providing orchestration, as well as security vendors Fortinet Inc. and Certes, whose functions are being virtualized. (See ESDN: RAD Rolls Out Distributed NFV Strategy and MWC Offers Peek at NFV Projects.)

So what is Distributed NFV? In this iteration of functions virtualization, some functionality is located at the customer premises on an X86 blade that, for the PoC purposes, is part of RAD's box, which serves as the network interface device. Having some programmability at the customer premises, rather than locating all the intelligence within the network's core, creates different service possibilities.

The PoC sponsor, CenturyLink Inc. (NYSE: CTL), looks at Distributed NFV as an opportunity to advance its managed services strategy, says James Feger, VP of Network Strategy and Development.

"One of our challenges as a company is getting the functionality into the customer suite or customer premises with requests for services and features rapidly changing," he tells Light Reading. By creating a virtual gateway or virtual network interface device (NID) at the customer premises, there is the potential of having a remote resource that becomes part of the virtual service environment and can be programmed with different settings as services change or evolve.

"So things we might want to host in our facilities and data centers and [central offices], like firewall services, could be augmented by having some of that at the premises," he notes. "It's just a matter of which locale makes more sense for that specific function. If you look at something like application awareness, for instance, it could make more sense to have that inside the customer premises versus having it northbound in the network."

From CenturyLink's perspective, the distributed NFV option complements a broader virtualization strategy -- but the jury is still out on what functions best at the edge versus the core, and thus the need for the PoC.

Masergy moving ahead
By contrast, Masergy Communications Inc. , a competitive service provider also focused on managed services, sees Distributed NFV as something it can deploy now, for the express purpose of eliminating most of the hassles it currently faces with maintaining CPE.

"The way we look at something like NFV is that our customers don't really care what the technology is," say Tim Naramore, CTO. "They are pushing us to eliminate all the local premises functions for them, as quickly as possible."

Masergy wants to use Distributed NFV to eliminate multiple discrete boxes at the customer premises, and create cloud-based control of most functions, to eliminate the need to maintain that gear and keep it certified and up-to-date for compliance purposes, Naramore says.

"Having intelligence in a device on the premises and the ability to load VMs [virtual machines] on that and run things opens up a new breed of things for customers," Naramore says. "And they are pushing us to do this."

Both Naramore and Feger say there are things that can't be virtualized and distributed for multiple reasons.

It can also be argued that distributing functions using a vendor box such as RAD's falls short of the virtualization goal of using off-the-shelf hardware in a more 'open' approach, but as Heavy Reading Senior Analyst Caroline Chappell notes, there are practical reasons for considering both options.

"It makes sense to use what you've got instead of putting something completely new in place," she says. "And the actual functions are running on an X86 blade on [RAD's] box. Presumably, you can add anything that can run on an X86."

Having a common orchestration layer may satisfy enough of the "open" requirements that, if pushed further, become impractical.

"We've seen some rowing back in terms of how 'open' all this environment can be," she notes. "There is an argument that the openness is coming from that fact you are using a common service orchestration layer."

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(10)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
reliaz074
50%
50%
reliaz074,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/17/2014 | 10:58:19 AM
things that can't be virtualized and distributed
An explanation of which functions must remain at the customer edge is found in RAD's D-NFV White Paper, which can be downloaded at http://www.rad.com/21/Distributed-Network-Functions-Virtualization-White-Paper/32548/
Dredgie
50%
50%
Dredgie,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/14/2014 | 8:05:44 PM
Re: Love is in the air
>> maybe the nuance, here is the fact that the CPE is X86 – though I think even that was assumed in the long-circulating NFV 'use cases' document that includes CPE (i.e. STB & resi-gateway) and edge devices with separated forwarding / control planes.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
3/14/2014 | 2:21:40 PM
Re: Love is in the air
They didn't spell them out for the most part but since virtualization of network resources is keyed toward centralized software-based control of network gear, Distributed NFV actually represents the break from the norm, to push some things to the edge (security, for one) that belong there. Most functions are expected to be more centralized and not distributed. 

 
t.bogataj
50%
50%
t.bogataj,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/14/2014 | 4:09:51 AM
Love is in the air
Carol,

Did Naramore and Feger name the "things that can't be virtualized and distributed", and why not?

T.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
3/13/2014 | 9:29:36 PM
Re: Two Faces of Distributed NFV
Mitch,

I think that is what CenturyLink is hoping to learn from the PoC - what is the reality and what are the real benefits. They are taking a very pragmatic approach.
DHagar
50%
50%
DHagar,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/13/2014 | 6:34:35 PM
Two Faces of Distributed NFV
@FakeMitchWagner, key points, Mitch.  Don't you think the answer to that will be in finding the right solutions that will deliver a viable user experience that makes the managed services a seamless part of operations?    Easy to say but tough to do.  I think if the carriers can develop the right solutions they will have a winning proposition that will be sustainable.
FakeMitchWagner
50%
50%
FakeMitchWagner,
User Rank: Lightning
3/13/2014 | 6:04:47 PM
Re: Two Faces of Distributed NFV
Anything that increases flexiblity while reducing the need to locate equipment on customer premises is potentially a winner. The question is whether the reality will live up to the potential. 
DHagar
50%
50%
DHagar,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/13/2014 | 5:50:00 PM
Two Faces of Distributed NFV
@Carol,  sounds like a very smart move!
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
3/13/2014 | 5:44:30 PM
Re: Two Faces of Distributed NFV
Both of the service providers I spoke with saw this as an enhancement to what they can deliver through managed services, so network as a service is probably an apt description. 

 
DHagar
50%
50%
DHagar,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/13/2014 | 4:58:00 PM
Two Faces of Distributed NFV
@Carol, Fascinating!  If I understand correctly, this is opening the door to a NaS (Network-as-Service) capability, which complements other shifts and movement towards virtualization.

That makes sense that some will provide the connectivity (networks and open or standardized systems) and others will focus on services. 

This again points to the user focus and the value technology delivers, more so than the technology itself.

 
Flash Poll
LRTV Custom TV
Distributed NFV-Based Business Services by RAD

7|18|14   |   5:38   |   (0) comments


With the ETSI-approved Distributed NFV PoC running in the background, RAD's CEO, Dror Bin, talks about why D-NFV makes compelling sense for service providers, and about the dollars and cents RAD is putting behind D-NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
MRV Accelerating Packet Optical Convergence

7|15|14   |   6:06   |   (0) comments


Giving you network insight to make your network smarter.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV-Enabled Ethernet for Generating New Revenues

7|15|14   |   5:49   |   (0) comments


Cyan's Planet Orchestrate allows service providers and their end-customers to activate software-based capabilities such as firewalls and encryption on top of existing Ethernet services in just minutes.
LRTV Custom TV
Symkloud NVF-Ready Video Transcoding, Big Data

7|9|14   |   3:41   |   (0) comments


Kontron and ISV partner Vantrix demonstrate high-performance video transcoding and data analytic solutions on same 2U standard platform that is ready for SDN and NFV deployments made by mobile, cable and cloud operators.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Evolving Role of Hybrid Video for Competitive Success

7|4|14   |   4:09   |   (0) comments


At Huawei's Global Analysts Summit in Shenzhen, China, Steven C. Hawley from TV Strategies speaks to us about the evolving role of hybrid video for competitive success.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
How CSPs Leverage Big Data in the Digital Economy

7|4|14   |   4:48   |   (2) comments


Justin van der Lande from Analysys Mason shares with us his views on how telecom operators can leverage customer asset monetization with big data. His discusses the current status of big data applications and the challenges and opportunities for telecom operators in the digital economy era.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Accelerator for Digital Business Future Oriented BSS

7|4|14   |   3:08   |   (0) comments


Mobile and internet are becoming intertwined; IT and CT are integrating; and leading CSPs have begun to transform to information service and entertainment providers. How should the BSS system evolve to enable this transformation? Karl Whitelock, an analyst at Frost & Sullivan, shares his views.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Orange Tunisia Discusses Multi-Band Antenna With EasyRET Solution

7|4|14   |   2:45   |   (0) comments


As new site acquisition becomes more difficult, Orange Tunisia has requested multi-band antenna to support UMTS and LTE innovation. Some things considered include reducing the cost of antenna maintenance and having high reliability antenna and EasyRET solution.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
How Telefonica Spain Considers Antenna Selection for LTE Network Deployment

7|4|14   |   2:19   |   (0) comments


Tony Conlan, Global CTO of RAN, Telefonica, shares his opinion on antennas in LTE network deployment: Tower space is the premier requirement on antennas; reliability is important to reduce OPEX; and EasyRET solution will be helpful for antenna maintenance.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
dtac Thailand: Multi-band Antenna & Capacity Solution for a Better MBB Experience

7|3|14   |   3:45   |   (0) comments


With the development of LTE, tower space and load are limited for new antenna, but users' capacity requirements are growing fast. To provide a better MBB experience, Panya Vechbanyongratana from dtac Thailand shared his experiences and antenna requirements.
LRTV Documentaries
BTE Panel: Network of the Future

7|2|14   |   1:00:57   |   (0) comments


Full-length video of the ATIS Panel Discussion: 'How Far Away Is the Network of the Future & What Does It Look Like?' from the Big Telecom Event (BTE) in Chicago.
LRTV Custom TV
Redknee Supports BH Telecom With Redknee Unified

7|2|14   |   6.14   |   (0) comments


Lucas Skoczkowski, CEO of Redknee, and Amir Orucevic, Director BH Mobile, discuss how the benefits of the Redknee Unified suite of products provide BH Telecom with innovation and leadership in the market, with the flexibility to launch services faster to the market, provide new and compelling promotions and pricing models, and combine services in order to drive ...
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
Infographics
Allot's latest MobileTrends Charging Report shows that value-based pricing plans are up from 35% in 2011 to 85% in 2014.
Today's Cartoon
Vacation Special Caption Competition Click Here
Hot Topics
Microsoft to Axe 12,500 Ex-Nokia Employees
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 7/17/2014
GM: 10 Car Models on Road With AT&T's LTE
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 7/18/2014
The Municipal Menace?
Jason Meyers, Senior Editor, Utility Communications/IoT, 7/22/2014
Have IBM & Apple Partnered Their Way to Cloud Leadership?
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 7/18/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed