& cplSiteName &

Lifting the Cloud Over SDN

Sunil Khandekar
7/21/2014
50%
50%

Software-defined networking (SDN) must be magic. Why else would researchers, educators, vendors, customers -- practically everyone and anyone connected to the networking industry -- be so high on SDN?

The answer, of course, lies in the promise of SDN. After all, isn't it supposed to completely transform networking? Isn't it the innovation that has finally rescued the networking industry after a decade-long drought? And, most importantly, isn't the SDN market forecast to generate tens of billions of dollars -- an estimate being raised every month? (See Defining SDN & NFV.)

The cloud over SDN
Interestingly, everyone has their own definition of SDN and their own take on how it will reshape the networking industry. That's not entirely surprising. The term is broad enough to allow everyone's convenient interpretation to stand. The industry has made progress in moving beyond hype, and customers are now asking how SDN will help them, rather than what SDN is. Nevertheless, there is still a fair amount of confusion, which causes doubt and constricts the real progress that SDN stands to deliver. It is time to lift the cloud over SDN.

Goal
The ultimate goal of an SDN solution is to massively simplify network operations, increase agility, and accelerate deployment of new services without sacrificing security and control.

Definition
The four key tenets of an SDN solution are abstraction, automation, control, and visibility.

SDN bridges the gap between applications and networks to enable the rapid consumption of network services such as bandwidth, QoS, security, firewall, and load balancing by providing visibility and control to the applications. It is about providing abstraction of network capabilities, and it is about the automation of network provisioning. It is about separating what applications need from how the network implements its capabilities.

In order to lift the cloud over SDN, we need to understand how various implementations of "SDN" currently promoted across our industry measure up against these defining characteristics of SDN.

1. Does SDN = OpenFlow?
Discussion of separating the control and data planes took off when the Open Networking Foundation introduced the OpenFlow protocol version 1.1 circa 2011. Normally, the control and forwarding planes are part of the same network switch or router. But the ONF advocated separating and logically centralizing the control plane from the forwarding plane. The forwarding plane would remain part of the network element -- in other words, the switch or router. The ONF introduced OpenFlow as the southbound protocol used by the control plane to program reachability information in the forwarding elements.

Separating the control plane and the forwarding plane was not new. It had been done a decade ago in routers, though both functions still resided in the same physical device. The idea of physically separating the two planes and logically centralizing the control plane is not new, either. It had been already proposed in prior work, such as IETF ForCES initiative. But the industry took note of the revived efforts this time around, and the idea opened up interesting possibilities. Benefits included the ability to conduct control plane upgrades that did not disrupt network forwarding, centralizing the control plane to enable traffic optimizations based on a network-wide view (vs. network-element views), and removing the burden of processor-intensive distributed control protocols from lightweight network elements: virtual switches, CPEs, etc.

However, the overt focus on the separation of the control and forwarding planes and the shiny new OpenFlow protocol diverted attention away from SDN. The separation of the control and forwarding planes created the notion that all forwarding elements could be made simpler and cheaper. It is absolutely true that the networking requirements in campus and data center networks have traditionally not been nearly as stringent as required in the WAN. As a result, the premium attached to these devices have not been justified. The "white-box" discussion that ensued in the industry and drove down the cost of networking devices commensurate with networking requirements has been great for customers. This change has been long overdue. It was tempting for some to apply the same broad brush everywhere and suggest that all networking elements, including WAN core and edge routers, could also be simplified. This caused some confusion in the industry, which has largely settled now.

To be clear, this approach -- separating the control and forwarding planes -- falls short when measured against the four tenets of SDN discussed before. Though it provides control over forwarding elements under the OF controller domain, it does not deliver against the other three tenets: visibility into applications, abstraction of networking capabilities, and network automation.

However, the long-overdue change that caused pricing structures to change in the networking industry is nothing but goodness, and the ONF deservedly gets the credit for this.

2. Does SDN = traffic engineering?
The often-cited case study of Google's SDN implementation for the purpose of traffic engineering the network is certainly interesting. The Google implementation is about computing optimal paths for the network using an offline compute tool and then programming these paths in network elements using OpenFlow. This approach affords Google full control and visibility over the network infrastructure. But it is not the first such implementation, nor is it new by any means.

The (former) MCI network team members must get a chuckle out of this, because they did exactly the same thing 14 years ago. The one difference? They did not use OpenFlow as the southbound protocol. Instead, they used MPLS labels for traffic engineered paths computed with an offline traffic engineering (TE) engine, now called a path computation element (PCE) server, which were programmed using SNMP in their network elements. Yes, this was back in Y2K.

Next: A new approach

(5)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
tdwivedi
50%
50%
tdwivedi,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/22/2014 | 8:45:09 PM
SDN
Thanks Sunil for distilling the buzzword into clear capabilities and characteristics.

I think the network is following the demands of the server and storage virtulization in the data center/enterprise and is responding to the economy of scale from the cloud computing.

I liked how you net the final goal of the network to be the "application delivery" with the abstraction of what from how, provisoning the network based on the application characteristics, and the visibility and control of the (App) delivery.

I see the similarities on OpenFlow with the other standards (and initiatives) and its possible fate (example SMI-S by SNIA from storage side of the world), as I see ONF has added conformance testing and vendor extenstions which reminds me of how fragmented the storage industry was in adopting the standards and the high expectation from customers and sysemintegrators. 

For reference http://snia.org/ I can't even find the SMi-S links now on the site. I wonder how is OpenFlow different from the other standards to lead a better outcome.

 

 

 

 
SunilKhandekar
50%
50%
SunilKhandekar,
User Rank: Blogger
7/22/2014 | 12:08:32 PM
Re: Let's not forget the business angle..
Thanks Steve.  

Couldn't agree more on the business benefits.  Indeed, massively simplying operations translates to OPEX savings, increasing agility and quicker TTM translates to capitalizing on opportunity, flexibility in the network infrastructure translates to CAPEX savings. 

Yes, my focus in the article is on the network and how to it is made consumable by SDN for applications running on top.  The applications running on top certainly are important on how they are architected for deployment and deliver efficiency and automation at that layer.
SunilKhandekar
50%
50%
SunilKhandekar,
User Rank: Blogger
7/22/2014 | 11:56:45 AM
Re: Bit quick to dismiss multi-vendor OSS
Definitely Ray - to the extent multi-vendor EMS helps right now to manage the existing mult-vendor networks, this is only goodness.  Was simply keeping focus on what SDN ultimately stands to deliver.
Steve Hateley
50%
50%
Steve Hateley,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/22/2014 | 9:28:26 AM
Let's not forget the business angle..
Great article Sunil.

From the Nuage position, your observations are good and well captured however I sense that there is still understandably an air of hardware vendor, "from the network up" perspective. But if the aim is to give an unbiased view on what SDN means to the industry across the board we should be throwing in the all-important business perspective. 

"The ultimate goal of an SDN solution is to massively simplify network operations, increase agility, and accelerate deployment of new services without sacrificing security and control."

Increasing agility (to build, configure and create new market-facing services) and accelerating deployment (shortening the time from lead-to-activate) are two goals that translate well into the concept of simplifying business automation. This requires a holistic ability to not only understand virtual networks and virtualised services, but to properly orchestrate their delivery from the sales process right through to the VNF manager and virtual machines. In many cases this sales automation is now driven from SaaS/Cloud based applications.

New startups with lightweight provisioning tools are a small part of the fully automated process, and provisioning is only one capability of the traditional EMS. In fact comprehensive orchestration needs to encompass technical catalog abstraction of available resources and logical services. In turn this is dependant upon a federated inventory perspective that reigns in not only the virtual resources but also logical and physical connectivity necessary to "connect" the cloud. Then of course there is "provisioning" but we mustn't forget the logical ordering of the necessary processes to activate requested services. So provisioning is just a cog in a larger machine.

SDN certainly brings an evolutionary change that impacts network vendors, CSPs, ISVs and customers all in one go - something that previous service and infrastructure enhancements have never fully done. Importantly though it's not just a network vendor play. To make it a success, NEMs, ISVs and CSPs need to find common ground and make it work. 

Best regards, Steve

 

 

 
Ray@LR
100%
0%
Ray@LR,
User Rank: Blogger
7/22/2014 | 3:32:52 AM
Bit quick to dismiss multi-vendor OSS
Good article Sunil, though I have to point out a slight tension in your argument.

 

You state early on that:

'The industry has made progress in moving beyond hype, and customers are now asking how SDN will help them...'

Indeed -- network operators want to know how SDN, and indeed ANY technology or strategy, will help them perform better, provide a better service and make (more/any) money.

 

Then later, when discussing 'next-generation element management systems', you rightly allude to the fact that a next-gen EMS does not equal SDN (and I think we all know who you're referring to here...) you state:

'Does [a multi-vendor EMS] provide business agility? Not really. At best, it enhances the present mode of operations, to an extent.'

I think there's a good argument that any multi-vendor EMS that works NOW and is also relevant to future network evolutionaryy developments is providing operational and business agility -- after all, the operators want to know HOW any technology can help them, and for most telcos SDN is something they are looking at for the future, whereas a multi-vendor EMS is something that can help them right now.

A multi-vendor EMS does not = SDN, but it can sure make a difference to companies struggling to maximize efficiencies and meet customer demands, something that an SDN implementation cannot do for them with such immediate impact.

So - I am not saying an EMS = SDN, or that SDN isn't going to transform networking, I'm just highlighting that you've maybe been a bit quick to dismiss something that COULD provide great value AND act as a stepping stone towards a virtualization strategy just because it doesn't tick your SDN boxes.  

 
More Blogs from Column
Spectrum sharing is becoming a bigger issue as the 5G radio specification evolves.
Addressing current and future app demands while laying the foundation for mobile's next big network transition.
Broadcasters can no longer rely on pulling audiences to the TV screen; they need to pursue their audiences on digital, wherever they are.
Why advanced data analytics are the future for streaming video services.
5G could ride the traditional wireless hype cycle, or – quite possibly – break the chain, suggests Nokia's North American CTO.
From The Founder
Light Reading today starts a new voyage as part of a larger Enterprise.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Interviews
No Stopping Cable's Ethernet Gains

12|9|16   |     |   (0) comments


Vertical Systems' Erin Dunne explains why US cable operators, which now command a record-high 26% of the Ethernet market, will keep boosting their share.
LRTV Interviews
Fixing IoT Security Is an Ecosystem Challenge

12|9|16   |   05:34   |   (1) comment


Level 3 Communications' Chief Security Officer Dale Drew says service providers, manufacturers and even consumers must combine to halt massive DDoS attacks using IoT devices in botnets. The solution he has in mind includes reputation-based routing by the service provider but also more secure endpoint devices and greater consumer awareness.
LRTV Interviews
Cox Clears $2B in Business Revenue

12|8|16   |     |   (0) comments


Cox's Jeff Breaux discusses how the third-largest US MSO will reach the $2 billion revenue mark this year and plans to hit $3 billion by 2021
LRTV Interviews
Can Cable Climb Upmarket?

12|7|16   |     |   (0) comments


Carol Wilson and Alan Breznick assess cable's prospects for winning more enterprises in a landscape rocked by corporate M&A activity.
Women in Comms Introduction Videos
TalkTalk Exec: Find Your North Star at Work

12|7|16   |   3:38   |   (1) comment


Women need to find their purpose, a professional North Star, and create a personal board for themselves, according to Alex Tempest, director of partners at TalkTalk Business.
LRTV Interviews
Verizon: Beware Unknown Unknowns

12|7|16   |   04:58   |   (0) comments


Chris Novak, director of the Verizon Enterprise Solutions Risk Team, explains that enterprises who don't conduct a thorough audit of their assets often leave some things unprotected because they don't know they exist. Many times these unprotected assets are part of corporate M&A activity but left unshielded they can become a hacker's playground, he tells Light ...
LRTV Interviews
ETSI's CTO Talks NFV, 5G & NGP

12|5|16   |   09:45   |   (0) comments


Adrian Scrase, CTO at standards body ETSI, talks about the various initiatives and specifications developments related to NFV, 5G and NGP (next-generation protocols) that will underpin next-gen networks.
Women in Comms Introduction Videos
Korn Ferry Consultant: How to Find, Cultivate & Be the Best Talent

11|30|16   |   4:10   |   (2) comments


Erin Callaghan, a managing consultant for Korn Ferry Futurestep, shares strategies for companies to improve how they recruit and for women to ensure they don't get lost in the pipeline.
LRTV Custom TV
We Can Make the World More Sustainable

11|29|16   |     |   (0) comments


GeSI is a global e-Sustainability Initiative organization bringing together 40 big multinational companies around the world. According to GeSI's report, information and communication technology can make the world more sustainable. Luis Neves, chairman of GeSI, shared with us his opinion at Ultra-broadband Forum (UBBF2016).
LRTV Custom TV
Finding a New Way to Engage Customers & Drive Revenue

11|29|16   |     |   (0) comments


Mobile revenues are declining. Digicel, a player in the Caribbean telecommunications/entertainment space, has found a new way to engage customers and drive revenue. John Quinn, CTO of Digicel, shared with us its story at Ultra-broadband Forum (UBBF2016)
LRTV Custom TV
Do You Really Need Gigabit Infrastructure?

11|29|16   |     |   (0) comments


Altibox is the biggest fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) player and the largest provider of video and TV in Norway. They started out with zero customers in 2002. Now they have close to half a million households and companies attached to their FTTH business. Nils Arne, CEO of Altibox shared with us their story and insight on 5G at Ultra-broadband Forum (UBBF2016).
LRTV Custom TV
BTís Openreach Strategy & Its Updates in 2016

11|29|16   |     |   (0) comments


A lot of developments at Openreach this year in terms of strategy and planned investments. Peter Bell, CIO of Openreach BT, shared with us the updates of Openreach at Ultra-broadband Forum (UBBF2016).
Upcoming Live Events
May 16-17, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Hot Topics
Cable Nodes Becoming a Choke Point
Brian Santo, Senior editor, Test & Measurement / Components, Light Reading, 12/5/2016
Consolidated Snaps Up Fairpoint for $1.5B
Iain Morris, News Editor, 12/5/2016
Small Arctic ISP Caches Netflix in New Way
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 12/7/2016
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Eyal Waldman, CEO of Mellanox Technologies, speaks to Steve Saunders, CEO of Light Reading, for an exclusive interview about the 100 GB cable challenge, cybersecurity and much more.
Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
Animals with Phones
A Mobile Safari Click Here
Literally.
Latest Comment
Live Digital Audio

Even when there's a strong pipeline of female talent in the comms industry, it tends to leak all the way to the top. McKinsey & Company says women experience pipeline leakage at three primary points: being unable to enter, being stuck in the middle or being locked out of the top. Each pipeline pain point presents its own challenges, but also opportunities to stop the leak. Wireless operator Sprint is making a conscious effort to improve its own pipeline from new recruits to the C-suite, and it wants the rest of the industry to do the same. In this Women in Comms radio show, WiC Board Member and Sprint Vice President of Enterprise Sales Nelly Pitocco will give us her take on the industry's pipeline challenges. Pitocco, who joined Sprint in May and has spent 20 years in the comms industry, will also offer solutions, share how Sprint is tackling the challenge within its own organization and take your questions live on air.