& cplSiteName &

Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC

Light Reading
News Analysis
Light Reading
11/11/2005
50%
50%

SAN DIEGO -- Telco TV Convention -- Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) and Alcatel (NYSE: ALA; Paris: CGEP:PA) are progressing in the challenging task of scaling up SBC Communications Inc.’s IPTV solution for use by hundreds of thousands of simultaneous users, sources here say. (See SBC Stretches Lightspeed Timeline .)

Light Reading reported last spring that Microsoft's IPTV middleware required one server for every 10 subscribers in order for the system's instantaneous channel-changing to work properly. (See SBC, Microsoft Defend Lightspeed.) A source close to the situation says the Microsoft middleware can now service far more subscribers -- into the thousands -- with a single server.

The source adds, however, that the scaleability of SBC’s video distribution system still has a long way to go. SBC says it will reach 17 million households with fiber-to-the-node (FTTN) and another 1 million greenfield residences using fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) by mid-2008. (See SBC on Lightspeed: Full Fiber Ahead.)

SBC’s executive director of video network planning, Paul Whitehead, spoke to a crowd of around a thousand here this morning -- mainly IPTV arms dealers and employees of U.S. IOCs.

He wasn’t too far into his presentation before the scaling issue came up. “The question is always, 'Can you scale IPTV?' ” Whitehead said. “And the answer is 'Yes.' And, yes, you’ve got to have a lot of servers... but we’re doing it...

“Despite a tremendous amount of swirl in the press," Whitehead continued, SBC's Microsoft TV solution will scale efficiently in time for mass-market rollout. Microsoft and SBC officials have been defensive about the issue since negative media reports surfaced last May. (See Swisscom IPTV Stall Sends Shivers.) "Sometimes I barely recognize this project, based on what I read about it in the press,” Whitehead bristled.

Many in the industry agree that Microsoft, Alcatel, and SBC will eventually get it right. (See Alcatel & Microsoft Going Steady.) “If you’ve got infinite brainpower and infinite resources to do something, as Microsoft does, you know they are eventually going to make it all work,” one IPTV equipment provider source here tells Light Reading.

Indeed most in the IPTV business are hoping that it does work, and the sooner the better. SBC's success might prompt other Tier 1 and Tier 2 carriers in the U.S. to speed the rollouts of their own systems, which would benefit everyone selling IPTV-related goods and services.

Several SBC, Microsoft, and Alcatel execs gave keynotes and sat on panels here, and they were all on message: SBC IPTV will roll out as planned, and it will change the way people watch TV. One notices that the Microsoft and Alcatel spokespeople make it a point to add: “Oh, and what we’re doing is really, really hard.” (See SBC Selects Microsoft for IPTV.)

“A lot of people have put their blood, sweat and tears into this thing over the last three years,” Whitehead says. "A lot of people have worked their rear ends off to make this work."

Whitehead’s presentation included several slides of SBC’s “super head end” in San Antonio. They showed the SBC dish farm, control stations, and banks of monitors. One slide featured a wall of server racks containing literally hundreds of servers, and room remained for hundreds more. “As you can see, we’re building for the future." (See Inside SBC's IPTV Factory.)

SBC trials with 40 of its employees will conclude at the end of the year, and a “scaled trial” of many more users will commence in 2006. Whitehead added that SBC intends to use in-home coaxial cable to wire up all TVs in a household, avoiding costly CAT-5 rewires.

Project Lightspeed will deliver about 25 Mbit/s of bandwidth to the household for video, voice, and data services, Whitehead said. With MPEG-4 compression now squeezing HDTV streams to a throughput requirement of less than 10 Mbit/s, most agree that the 25 Mbit/s will be sufficient.

Many of the hallway conversations here concerned the telcos’ ability to offer something new in order to convince cable and satellite subscribers to switch over when the time comes. (See IPTV vs Me-Too TV.)

But Whitehead, being a network guy, stressed the basics first: “At SBC, making sure we have good picture quality in standard definition is really part of our plans. [We’re concerned about] every TV in the house having digital picture quality; every TV in the house has to have the same interface and the same DVR capability." (See IPTV Alters Network Landscape.)

Like most of the industry, Whitehead acknowledges that the convergence of SBC's various networks and services onto one IP-based delivery platform is the way to offer the integrated services the cable guys can't.

“Clearly one of the reasons we’re getting into IPTV is that we are really trying to do the quad play," Whitehead said, referring to the VOIP, IPTV, high-speed data, and wireless services in the Project Lightspeed offering.

"If we really want to compete in the future we really have too many networks. We are convinced that we are really going to take a lot of cost out by combining those networks and putting all our services on an IP network.”

— Mark Sullivan, Reporter, Light Reading

(85)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 9   >   >>
paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 2:54:26 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC

In the same time span that SBC is talking about how it is going to make something work someday, Verizon has passed millions of customers, connected 10s (if not 100s) of thousands of customers, and commercially launched its video service.

Talk is cheap.

seven
palaeozoic
50%
50%
palaeozoic,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:54:24 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC
It should also be noted that the Verizon deployment is the technically safer but uninteresting RF overlay approach, basically replicating a cable service over fiber.

RF is cheap.
rjmcmahon
50%
50%
rjmcmahon,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:54:23 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC
Uninteresting because it is available and works?

Uninteresting because it doesn't enable anything new. Cable works fine for TV service. There seems little reason to dig trenches and hang fiber on poles to replicate what's already there. It may help with the facilities based competition ideology but that's an absurd belief system that regulators lean on when they abdicate their responsibilities.
lightsucker
50%
50%
lightsucker,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:54:23 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC
Maybe they should give EPON at shot. It seems to be working all around the world with no problems.
paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 2:54:23 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC

Uninteresting because it is available and works?

seven
uguess
50%
50%
uguess,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:54:22 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC
I don't believe that you really cannot understand why IP networks are better for SPs.
paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 2:54:22 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC

So, why does something so completely and utterly useless as a new programming guide get your attention.

Please understand - no new content, no new service, just this really cool way to change channels. That is IPTV.

Please describe why that is interesting.

seven
uguess
50%
50%
uguess,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:54:21 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC
Additional services can be turned on once you have the IP infranstructure in place. Overlay network is not the way to go, no matter how you look at it.

uguess
paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 2:54:21 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC

uguess,

I am talking about the actual IPTV service. You are talking about an abstract concept. Please define what can be done on an IPTV network that can not be done on an HFC for FTTP RF overlay network.

The reason they are doing IPTV is because Switched Digital Video is REQUIRED for video over DSL. Not because some new magic is about to occur.

seven
ynova111
50%
50%
ynova111,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:54:21 AM
re: Scaling IPTV: Progress at SBC
Any reason why Verizon can not insert IPTV onto their Fiber 3-5 years from now ?

Are the smart taking the safe approach, getting fiber out, getting revenue, less risk - less bugs-increase customer statisfaction, than introduce IPTV when the technology is more mature / stable.

I would love fiber TV & Data in my area. Much cheaper than cable; higher downlink & uplink speed on my data. My home server will enjoy it much also.

It would be nice to get competition on the cable (Comcast in my area); stop those 6 months price increase's on "improved services - cost of services" letters.
Page 1 / 9   >   >>
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
December 5-7, 2017, The Intercontinental Prague
March 20-22, 2018, Denver Marriott Tech Center
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
SmartNICs aren't just about achieving scale. They also have a major impact in reducing CAPEX and OPEX requirements.
Hot Topics
Eurobites: Telefónica Reckons Plastic Is Fantastic for FTTH
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 11/15/2017
Juniper's New Contrail VP Hails From Google
Craig Matsumoto, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading, 11/15/2017
AT&T's Lurie Leaps to Synchronoss as New CEO
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 11/17/2017
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
The Mobile Broadband Road Ahead
By Kevin Taylor, for Huawei
All Partner Perspectives