& cplSiteName &

Top Ten Video Sharing Websites

Phil Harvey

Editor's Note: Check out our most recent video sharing survey: Online Video: Show Us the Money. Also, note that the Web Video Cheat Sheet has been updated and can be found right here: http://www.lightreading.com/videoshare.

Dear Reader: We've launched an entire new site tracking the video-sharing industry. Contentinople's Video Sharing Guide contains hundreds of entries and allows you to rate your favorite video sites!

Among other things, 2006 will be remembered as the year online video really became something you share, not just something you log onto and watch.

Sure, there will always be a place for viral videos that get emailed to dozens of friends and coworkers. I mean, who ever gets tired of watching a cat flush a toilet or seeing a skateboarder render himself infertile?

But the sheer volume of video sharing sites that have come online in the past 18 months suggests that the online video trend won't be confined to something people do to entertain themselves on a coffee break. To wit, hundreds of thousands of consumers are beginning to share video online, and that's having a profound impact on how much bandwidth is consumed and how broadband providers make money.

"HDTV, next-generation gaming, personal video, and digital photography will all contribute to the emergence of a new broadband gold standard of 100 Mbit/s symmetric over the next 12 to 24 months," writes Heavy Reading senior analyst Graham Finnie in his latest report on the fiber-to-the-home market. (See FTTH Hits Mainstream.)

Video sharing: the viral spiral
Bandwidth consumption isn't the only byproduct of the increase in video sharing. Content distribution networks are beefing up, and the companies in that space are thriving as Web-based services make it easy to exchange larger and larger files. (See CacheLogic Builds P2P Content Network and Video Caching Steps Into the Limelight.) Also, service providers like AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) are pairing up with Internet TV companies like Akimbo Systems to make sure they can deliver, not just regular TV channels, but some consumer-generated content as well. (See AT&T, Cisco Elbow Into Akimbo and Will Telcos Want Their Dave.tv?)

Content makers and advertisers are seeking out online video sites as a way to reach younger demographics. (See Google Pushes MTV Video.) Even Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) says it won't be left out. "MSN is currently developing a user-generated/user-submitted video solution that will launch this year," a spokeswoman for Microsoft says. "The solution will integrate with Windows Live Spaces and across MSN.com. Stay tuned!"

The Top Ten
With all that going on, it's definitely worth looking at who stands out in this ridiculously crowded space. Since popular opinion does matter online – where the consumer experience is hugely important – we thought it'd be useful to rank some of the Internet's most popular video sharing sites by how they performed from the point of view of someone wanting to post videos rather than just look at someone else's.

Without further ado, here's our list of the Top Ten Video Sharing Sites

The complete rankings
Here are the video sharing site rankings, in full:

Table 1: Video Sharing Sites: The Rankings
Website Ease of Use (30 points possible) File Size, Storage Limitations (30 points possible) Other Stuff: Format Flexibility, Editing, Distribution, and Privacy Options (40 points possible) Final Score Comments
Blip.tv 30 30 35 95 Does everything imaginable with uploaded videos. Doesn't have editing features yet, though.
VideoEgg 30 25 39 94 VideoEgg makes it so easy to push videos to other sites, and the videos look great when they arrive. By far, this was one of the most responsive services we tested.
Dailymotion 30 26 35 91 Responsive site and very easy to use. Distribution options were especially nice, too.
YouTube 27 28 35 90 YouTube is definitely the gold standard of video sharing sites. And, even though the site clutter is excessive and a few features need tweaking, there's definitely a reason why they're the one to beat.
Veoh 27 30 30 87 Is this the P2P dream come true? Veoh's created a very solid, reliable video sharing experience sweetened by the lack of upload size restrictions. Bravo, Veoh!
Google Video 30 25 31 86 Typical Google. Easy on the eyes. Easy to use. Limited distribution options.
Grouper 19 26 40 85 A little confusing at first, but the service has lots and lots of functionality once you download the free software application.
Jumpcut 30 10 40 80 The best online editing tools. Pity about the file size restrictions, though.
AOL 26 25 28 79 The VideoEgg technology makes uploading, trimming, and viewing easy. Distribution options are limited, and one set of embeddable links provided were full of HTML errors.
Eyespot 30 14 34 78 This site has some of the coolest editing features.
Fliqz 30 15 30 75 Very user friendly and family friendly. Sparse sharing options. No editing. But the site was only launched in July, so it's got lots of room to grow.
Guba 20 27 28 75 Another site that's pretty good, but doesn't really stand out in a crowd.
Openvlog 30 20 25 75 Another nice site. "Record" feature allows users with Webcams to make their own video on the spot.
Revver 25 15 35 75 Another nice overall site. Takes a while for video to show up, though.
ManiaTV 30 15 28 73 Tom Green has a ManiaTV show. Why don't you?
ClipShack 25 20 27 72 A nice site that's easy to use.
Motionbox 27 15 30 72 Motionbox offers an exceptional feature that allows you to highlight specific bits of videos and share just the good stuff. Blog support and other distribution options are coming along. This site will definitely climb in the ranks as it matures.
Eefoof.com 25 30 15 70 What was all the hype about?
MySpace 30 15 25 70 Slim sharing options. No video editing. And, as usual, there's a file size limit.
Sharkle 25 20 25 70 It's called Sharkle, but it doesn't sparkle.
Vimeo 30 10 30 70 Another winner in the "ease of use" category. The lack of viral videos on the site is nice, too.
vMix 22 20 25 67 Slideshow tools are nice. But this site's video sharing experience is only a little above average.
Bolt 25 15 25 65 Supports RSS feeds, but other distribution options weren't apparent. Lots of contests that appeal to teens.
DropShots.com 25 10 30 65 Like Phanfare and Fliqz, this one's family friendly and easy to use, but probably more appealing for photo sharing.
GoFish 25 10 30 65 Not a bad starter site. But you should go fish for something better if you're serious about video.
Phanfare 20 25 20 65 This ad-free, clutter-free site was conceived around sharing, archiving, and uploading photos, so the support of video is sort of a bonus for existing members. Not really a place to start if you're serious about video.
Video Webtown 20 30 15 65 We had a tough time uploading and converting a Windows Media file. Otherwise, the site's clunky design might be worth tolerating so long as it continues to offer more storage space than most sharing sites.
VidiLife 5 30 30 65 We could complain about the user interface and the lack of features, but why bother? The annoying Circuit City popup ads on every page will keep users away in droves.
vSocial 25 15 25 65 Sparse and functional, like Google. But ugly, like something a novice would have built.
iFilm 28 15 20 63 This site used to be good for seeing studio content and serious short films. Now it's also a "me too" in the viral video space.
Panjea 26 15 20 61 A Revver-ish site with more community site features.
Atom Films (AddictingClips.com) 25 15 20 60 Supports all the right formats. No decent distribution options. Privacy options unclear.
Photobucket 15 15 30 60 Another photo site with bolted-on video features. Functional, but not impressive.
HomeMovie.com 12 15 30 57 Nice software, but the company's video sharing, distribution options, and pricing model are holdovers from the days of videotape.
Yahoo Video 20 15 22 57 Where's the creativity? Yahoo is just doing a "me too" � and not a very good one, either.
Filecow 30 10 15 55 A fine place to host small files for free.
Streamload's Mediamax 0 30 25 55 We couldn't get Streamload to upload! We've heard raves about the sharing service and registering was dead easy, but uploading wasn't possible � even after rebooting, turning off the firewall, and changing to a different Internet connection. Maybe you'll have better luck.
Metacafe 15 15 20 50 Hard to see why the world needs YouTube and Metacafe. During a test upload the site couldn't recognize the same Windows Media file that 40-something other sites had no trouble accepting.
ZippyVideos 25 5 20 50 Meow. Another copycat site with nothing new to offer.
Lulu TV 15 10 20 45 Maybe instead of paying content creators, they should concentrate on hiring some good Web designers.
Ourmedia 2 30 10 42 What a mess! The folks at Ourmedia are so inclusive they've managed to create a site that's cluttered, slow, and doesn't work � for everyone.
Putfile 20 5 15 40 Viciously viral. YouTube's UK cousin, perhaps?
Castpost 10 10 10 30 The site took forever to load, and our video never did appear. Looks as though they're going through some growing pains.
Yikers 5 0 5 10 You can share videos here, but Yikers is mainly a place for folks who want to watch viral videos without ads.
Pooxi Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete Incomplete This is a popular site, but we didn't rank because our ability to read French might've caused them undeserved ratings damage.
Sources: Light Reading and company data

The burning questions
Now that you know who the winners and losers are, let's get into how we arrived at our scores. It all started with the following blogs, which helped generate the list of 45 video sharing Websites that we went on to evaluate, and helped identify the issues that differentiate them:

Each site was visited, used, and scored in three main areas that we felt would make the most difference to the largest number of people wanting to post videos for sharing with others:

  • Ease of use. Maximum possible score: 30
  • File size, storage limitations. Maximum possible score: 30
  • "Other stuff" including format flexibility, editing capabilities, distribution networks, and privacy options. Maximum score 40.

The scoring system aims to reflect the likely viewpoint of consumers who are relatively new to video sharing – folks more inclined to start out by just sharing video with family and friends. We also gave lots of consideration to content creators who are using the Internet as a cheap distribution platform. Hence the scoring that goes beyond ease of use to also look at costs, site performance, file size limitations, and distribution options.

The people whose needs we really didn't consider are the compulsive viral video posters looking for an "Internet hit." Chances are that group has found a handful of favorite sites already.

For the reasons behind some of the scores, check out Table 2: Table 2: Video Sharing Websites: Burning Questions
Website Does the service offer video editing capability? What's the file size limit? How much does it cost? Can I keep a video private? Does it require a software download?
AOL Yes, you can trim the video's length. From the site: "To keep things manageable, the maximum video length has been set to 5 minutes." Free No No
Atom Films (AddictingClips.com) No 100 Mbytes. Clips must be 10 minutes long or less. Free Yes No
Blip.tv No There's no enforced limit. But the service "strongly recommends" files smaller than 100 Mbytes "for performance purposes." Free No No
Bolt No 100 Mbytes Free Yes No
Castpost No 50-Mbyte clip requirement. Unless you ask for special permission. From the Website: "The current Alpha service is free. But we may try to recover some of our costs through ads." Yes No
ClipShack No 100 Mbytes, but you can upload larger files using a free software app; up to 5 Gbytes of storage Free Yes No
Dailymotion No 150 Mbytes Free Yes No
DropShots.com No The free version is limited to 500 photos and 10 videos. Photos can be any file size and any dimension. Videos can be any file size and up to 2 minutes in length. Free Yes No
Eefoof.com No Videos must 200 Mbytes or less in size and 10 minutes or less in length. Free No No
Eyespot Yes Max one-time upload limit is seven 50-Mbyte videos Free Yes No
Filecow No 25 Mbytes Free Yes No
Fliqz Yes 100 Mbytes Free Yes No
GoFish No 50 Mbytes Free No No
Google Video No None. From the company's user guidelines: "You can upload as many videos to Google Video as you like, without any size or length limitations." WOW! Note: Files over 100 Mbytes require a software app to upload. Free No No
Grouper Yes 110 Mbytes Free (for now) Yes Yes, for everything except tiny, tiny files.
Guba No 1.2 Gbytes per upload, but there's no length limit. Free Yes No
HomeMovie.com Yes None Free (share up to 5 hours of video online per month) Yes Yes
iFilm No 100 Mbytes Free Yes No
Jumpcut Yes 50 Mbytes Free Yes No
Lulu TV No 32 Mbytes with a free account. 100 Mbytes with a $14.95/month account. Free, unless you become a Shareholder Yes No
ManiaTV No 100 Mbytes Free Yes No
Streamload's Mediamax No The site's free accounts provide 25 Gbytes of free storage for any kind of media files. Free users are also limited to 1 Gbyte of access bandwidth per month. Free Yes No
Metacafe No 100 Mbytes Free Yes No
Motionbox No 100 Mbytes Free Yes No
MySpace No 100 Mbytes Free Yes No
Openvlog No Under 5 minutes in length Free Yes No
Ourmedia No None mentioned. Free Yes No
Panjea No 100 Mbytes per file. 250 Mbytes of storage overall. Free No No
Phanfare No Phanfare accepts video clips up to 5 minutes in length or 1 Gbyte in size. $6.95/mo. for unlimited storage Yes Yes
Photobucket No Free accounts get 1 GByte of space and 10 GBytes of bandwidth per month. Video clips can't exceed 5 minutes each. Free Yes No
Pooxi No 50 Mbytes Free Not sure. The site's primary language is French. No
Putfile No 25 Mbytes Free No No
Revver No 100 Mbytes Free Yes Yes
Sharkle No 100 Mbytes Free (up to 1 Gbyte of storage) Yes No
Veoh No None. Movies can be any length and as high quality as you like. Free Yes Yes
Video Webtown No 30 Gbytes of disk space and 30 Gbytes of bandwidth per user Free Yes No
VideoEgg Yes. Same as with AOL � if a video is too long, you can use a preview player to trim its length and erase sections you don't want. Videos must be kept to less than 5 minutes long. From the site: "While there's no technical limit to the length of video the Publisher can post, long videos are expensive to store and stream." Free (for now) Yes Yes. The VideoEgg publisher is required, but it's just a tiny Web browser plug-in and installs in a minute.
vidiLife No No limit Free Yes No
Vimeo No 30 Mbytes a week Free No No
vMix Yes (For slideshows only) 200 Mbytes Free Yes No
vSocial No 100 Mbytes Free No No
Yahoo Video No 100 Mbytes Free No No
Yikers No Under 10 Mbytes $4.98/mo. No No
YouTube No None. From the site's FAQ: "Most videos on YouTube are under five minutes long. There is no specific length limit, but longer videos require more compression to fit in the 100MB size limit, and the quality will go down as the length of the video goes up." Free Yes No
ZippyVideos No Under 10 Mbytes without registration. Up to 20 Mbytes with user registration. Free Yes No
Sources: Light Reading and company data

This drills down on the following issues:
  • Video editing capabilities
  • File size limit
  • How much it costs
  • Whether videos can be kept private
  • Whether a software download is necessary
The fine print
One final thing we didn't grade, but users should watch out for, are the terms of use. Most free video sharing services, with few exceptions, grant themselves a license to monetize and advertise your uploaded content any way they can. And very few, if any, of the bucks those sites may make off of your stuff will ever reach your bank account.

Yahoo Inc. (Nasdaq: YHOO), for instance, grants itself the right to use your videos "for advertising, promotional or commercial purposes, including without limitation, the right to publicly display, perform, reproduce and distribute Your Video Content in any media format or medium and through any media channels."

And Yahoo's terms are pretty typical. Another way to think of it: If you upload a certifiable mainstream hit, they'll make bank on the motion picture rights and DVD sales – not you. So there. You've been warned. Be careful.

Copping some traffic
So now we've covered our methodology, here are some final bits of information we picked up along the way that, while not critical to our rankings, do shed some light on the overall growth of the online video sharing market.

One item of interest: Not all the sites that stand out, performed well, and flourished in the rankings have managed to attract a massive online audience. Interestingly, only a few in our Top Ten List have what could be considered remarkable traffic numbers, but that's likely to change, considering how relatively new some of these video sharing services are:

Table 3: By the Numbers: Light Reading's Top 10 Video Sharing Sites
Light Reading Rank Site Unique Audience Time Spent Per Person (hh:mm:ss)
1 Blip.tv ** **
2 VideoEgg ** **
3 Dailymotion * 515,000 0:06:25
4 YouTube 30,541,000 0:26:07
5 Veoh 1,011,000 0:03:21
6 Google Video 9,348,000 0:06:16
7 Grouper * 630,000 0:02:06
8 Jumpcut ** **
9 AOL ** **
10 Eyespot ** **
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings � U.S. Home and Work Audience, July 2006
* Note: Because the audience measured for these Websites is smaller than the standard sample size, the projected audience figures for these sites may vary greatly from month to month.
** These Websites have insufficient sample sizes for reliable projection of audience size.

Finally, while we're focusing here on video sharing services, we thought it might also be interesting to see what online video sites are most popular in the U.S. and abroad. Relatively few sites have managed to pull off becoming both an entertainment destination and a user-friendly hub for video distribution:

Table 4: Top US Online Video Sites, Week Ending August 5, 2006
U.S. Rank Name Domain Market Share of Visits
1 YouTube www.youtube.com 47.70%
2 MySpace Videos vids.myspace.com 24.81%
3 Yahoo! Video Search video.search.yahoo.com 6.85%
4 MSN Video Search video.msn.com 6.14%
5 Google Video video.google.com 4.52%
6 AOL Media us.video.aol.com 4.37%
7 iFilm www.ifilm.com 1.74%
8 MetaCafe www.metacafe.com 1.53%
9 vMix www.vmix.com 0.45%
10 Daily Motion www.dailymotion.com 0.37%
Source: Hitwise
Data based on Market Share of Visits, which is the percentage of all traffic to a particular Website.

Table 5: Top UK Online Video Sites, Week Ending August 5, 2006
UK Rank Name Domain Market Share of Visits
1 YouTube www.youtube.com 65.04%
2 Google Video video.google.com 7.73%
3 MySpace Videos vids.myspace.com 7.40%
4 Google Video UK video.google.co.uk 6.18%
5 MetaCafe www.metacafe.com 3.26%
6 Yahoo! Video Search video.search.yahoo.com 2.36%
7 AddictingClips www.addictingclips.com 2.14%
8 AOL Media us.video.aol.com 1.85%
9 Break.com www.break.com 1.40%
10 Singingfish www.singingfish.com 1.35%
Source: Hitwise
Data based on Market Share of Visits, which is the percentage of all traffic to a particular Website.

— Phil Harvey, News Editor, Light Reading

Next Page: blip.tv

(33)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
User Rank: Light Beer
10/7/2013 | 11:19:06 AM
DailyMotion is a decent video host, but from my experience after several years using their platform, I have canceled my account. I use iMovie to create videos, and within that there is iLife Sound effects. This is a Royalty Free Creative Commons type scenario that Apple, Inc, absolutely provides for free use...period.

Each and every time I uploaded a new video to DailyMotion, that always uses the same sound bed fro iLife it gets black listed and takes a repeat of the same information to get it released. This is  even after asking their CS to note my account to stop wasting my time in having to go through the same process time after time. To no avail. So there are others out there easier to work with.
User Rank: Light Beer
6/5/2013 | 2:31:55 AM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
Can anyone vouch for Fabio?
User Rank: Light Beer
5/23/2013 | 7:14:29 AM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
I noticed lots of the video sharing websites are dead now because of youtube. thus the video sharing choice is smaller and smaller. http://www.smartpixel.com.
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:20:33 PM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites

youtube is currently off in saudia pakistan and other countires we are using jogos da barbie

User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:06:44 PM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
All of these online video websites continue to have growth and are growing their user base. I wonder how the news about Youtube costing Google will influence the direction they take
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:10:57 PM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
Next time you do a review please include the newest video sharing site where you OWN your work called http://www.flixhunt.com
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:10:56 PM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
Will do.
Scott Raynovich
Scott Raynovich,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 3:07:46 PM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
"amature writer."

That says it all! LOL.

BTW, to me, anybody that uses Alexa to cite traffic metrics is uncredible.
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:44:43 AM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
Your list says that some sites allow videos to remain private.

I chose Youtube because they did not have a download option.

Later I found out that videos can be captured and I tried it on mine to verify.

No, I'm not publicizing how.

To answer your question - I think you missed noting that it can be done.

The other thing (and I would appreciate a reply to this) is in your mention of ownership. If I pull my video do they still try to make claim? What sites do NOT lay any claims to my work?
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:44:43 AM
re: Top Ten Video Sharing Websites
are there some big, well-known video sharing sites we missed?

what about the rankings? how would you have ranked the sites differently?

Page 1 / 3   >   >>
From The Founder
Download our complete guide to de-risking NFV deployment in 2016, including:
  • An eight-step strategy to deploying NFV safely, based on input from the companies that have already started virtualizing their production networks.
  • Interviews with leading executives at Colt, AT&T, Deutsche Telekom, Cisco, Nokia, ZTE, Ericsson and Heavy Reading.
  • Flash Poll
    Live Streaming Video
    Prepping for the Future: Upskill U Explained
    During this short kick-off video, Doug Webster, Vice President of Service Provider Marketing, Cisco, and Light Reading’s CEO & Founder Steve Saunders give an overview of Upskill U.
    LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
    Amsterdam ArenA, Powered by Huawei

    5|4|16   |     |   (0) comments

    Huawei's ICT solutions power the state-of-the-art Amsterdam ArenA, turning it into a smart stadium.
    LRTV Interviews
    Testing When There's No 'There' There

    5|4|16   |     |   (0) comments

    The benefits of SDN/NFV are well known, but the transition comes with some challenges, prominent among them is: how do you test a network that has been abstracted and has the potential to be endlessly reconfigurable? Light Reading was at NFV World Congress in Santa Clara, Calif., where we bumped into Mats Nordlund, CEO and co-founder of Netrounds, a Swedish ...
    LRTV Interviews
    Ditching the Slash & the Orchestration Wars

    5|3|16   |     |   (2) comments

    SDN and NFV have been inextricably bound with each other for so long that on a conceptual level, smooshing them together into one catch-all phrase – SDNFV – is now justifiable, according to Dan Pitt, executive director of the Open Networking Foundation (ONF). Light Reading spoke to Pitt at the NFV World Congress, where he explained that the next ...
    LRTV Custom TV
    ZTE TV Connect Highlights

    5|3|16   |     |   (0) comments

    ZTE gives us a tour of its booth and new products at TV Connect in London.
    LRTV Custom TV
    Deluxe's Unified Delivery Solution

    5|3|16   |     |   (0) comments

    Join Alan Breznick of Light Reading and visit the Deluxe booth at NAB! Here you'll find Deluxe's Unified Delivery Solution, OTT video, virtual reality, HDR, 4K and much more!
    LRTV Interviews
    Verizon Puts Gray Boxes in the Shade

    5|2|16   |   04:33   |   (1) comment

    When it comes to the white box trend, "gray" boxes, which have a slight proprietary twist, don't give service providers and end users the advantages they're seeking, according to Verizon's Vice President of Product and New Business Innovation Shawn Hakl.
    LRTV Custom TV
    Dealing With a Disrupted Video Market

    5|2|16   |     |   (0) comments

    Ericsson's Simon Frost discusses how traditional pay-TV providers can cope with the big changes wrought by the rise of OTT video and IP technology.
    LRTV Custom TV
    The VNF Responsibility of Red Hat

    5|2|16   |     |   (0) comments

    At MWC, Caroline Chappell of Heavy Reading visits the Red Hat booth and sits down with Chris Wright to talk about the responsibility the VNF needs to take on in order to ensure the operators get the carrier-grade performance they expect for their network.
    LRTV Interviews
    AT&T Expert on the Key Pillars of UC

    4|29|16   |   03:58   |   (0) comments

    Vishy Gopalakrishnan, AVP of product marketing at AT&T, talks about the three developments that are making unified communications and collaboration secure and reliable for enterprise users.
    LRTV Documentaries
    LRTV Report: Mobile Core Innovation

    4|28|16   |   25:32   |   (0) comments

    Hear from multiple industry experts from Deutsche Telekom, SK Telecom, Heavy Reading, Huawei, Cisco, Ericsson, Nokia, NEC and many more about developments in the mobile core as operators virtualize their IMS and evolved packet core systems and prepare for a 5G world.
    LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
    NFV World Congress Highlight

    4|26|16   |     |   (0) comments

    The highlight of the NFV World Congress contains exciting telecom news. Join us for an inside look at Huawei's ICT 2020 plan and its latest collaboration with industry leaders.
    LRTV Interviews
    Unified Comms Finds Its Voice

    4|25|16   |   03:44   |   (0) comments

    Peter Quinlan, VP of UCC Product Management at Tata Communications, talks about the evolution of the unified communications and collaboration services sector and how voice is now a big part of current developments.
    Upcoming Live Events
    May 23, 2016, Austin, TX
    May 23, 2016, Austin Convention Center
    May 24-25, 2016, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
    September 13-14, 2016, The Curtis Hotel, Denver, CO
    December 6-8, 2016,
    June 16-18, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
    All Upcoming Live Events
    A new survey conducted by Heavy Reading and TM Forum shows that CSPs around the world see the move to digital operations as a necessary part of their overall virtualization strategies.
    Hot Topics
    Ultra-Broadband Summit, Hong Kong
    Iain Morris, News Editor, 4/27/2016
    Amazon AWS Reports $2.6B Quarterly Revenue, Up a Colossal 64%
    Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 4/28/2016
    WiCipedia: Woman Cards & Bitch Switches
    Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms, 4/29/2016
    Sprint CEO: Our Spectrum Is for 5G
    Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 5/3/2016
    Amazon & Other 'Big 4' Cloud Providers Crushing Competitors
    Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 4/29/2016
    Like Us on Facebook
    Twitter Feed
    BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
    In this latest installment of the CEO Chat series, Craig Labovitz, co-founder and CEO of Deepfield, sits down with Light Reading's Steve Saunders in Light Reading's New York City office to discuss how Deepfield fits in with the big data trend and more.
    Grant van Rooyen, president and CEO of Cologix, sits down with Steve Saunders, founder and CEO of Light Reading, in the vendor's New Jersey facility to offer an inside look at the company's success story and discuss the importance of security in the telecom industry.
    Animals with Phones
    Sloth Mail Click Here
    Sloth mail -- somehow even slower than snail mail.
    Live Digital Audio

    Of all the tech companies in the Valley, Intel has made the most aggressive commitment to building a diverse and inclusive workplace culture. It's doing so by taking concrete, measurable steps, making a large financial investment and through a commitment to complete transparency about its progress. In this radio show, WiC Director Sarah Thomas will be joined by Shlomit Weiss, Intel's Vice President, Data Center Group, and General Manager of Networking Engineering, who will share with us why Intel is tackling this huge challenge, how and to what effect. She will also discuss her unique experiences leading development of Client SOC development in the past and today leading development of all of the chipmaker's silicon hardware for networking IPs and discrete devices and managing a team of 600 engineers across Israel, Europe and the US.