Light Reading

If Not Muni Networks, Then What?

Carol Wilson
7/28/2014
50%
50%

The latest round of municipal network battles has quickly escalated to the federal level, with FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler promising to challenge state laws prohibiting muni networks and Republicans in Congress trying to prevent his agency from interfering with state laws. (See Muni Utilities Take Gigabit Fight to FCC.)

This looks for the world like the latest chapter in what has been a decade-long battle between incumbent carriers and the cities, towns and rural areas they serve. But it's not.

A few things have changed since the first few rounds of the muni network wars.

First, many of these areas have seen what gigabit broadband services can do, courtesy of the broadband stimulus-funded buildouts, state projects, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 's own gigabit challenge, Google Fiber Inc. and more. They've seen what EPB Fiber Optics of Chattanooga, Tenn., accomplished and they've also seen commercial service providers, led by AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), make gigabit promises as well. (See Chattanooga Rocks 1-Gig FTTH Service, Power Companies Promise Gigabit Broadband, Google Fiber Shifts Into High Gear).


For ongoing updates on Gigabit Cities and the municipal network debate, visit Light Reading's Broadband/FTTx content channel.


But for under-served communities, watching gigabit speeds reach places such as Austin, Tex. -- an area already flowing over with tech business -- is a little like watching the circus train pass through town but never stop.

The second significant change has been in the US economy, which continues to flounder somewhat, due largely to major long-term job trends that haven't yet been addressed. Communities that once counted on manufacturing, for instance, are still seeking similar well-paying jobs for those who aren't college educated. The pervasive availability of goods and services online, layered on top of the rise of massive chain stores, has made it hard to impossible for local retail to survive. Other industries –- publishing/printing, for example –- have been dramatically impacted by the rise of the Internet as well.

At the same time, the rise of cloud computing and data storage/analytics has prompted competition for data centers and other similar facilities. Financial services, healthcare, education, retail, and many more industries are dependent on the availability not just of high-speed data, but of gigabit speeds.

And finally, the technology itself and some of the painful experiences of the past have led to a smarter approach to building fiber-optic networks to support these gigabit speeds. The common argument a decade ago was that cities didn't know how to run networks, but the experiences in Chattanooga and Bristol, Va., among others, has laid that thinking to rest.

When Rep. Martha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) launched the amendment to a House bill to keep the FCC from challenging state laws against muni networks, she waged the expected argument that states' rights shouldn't be violated, but she also mentioned the "vibrant communications marketplace" that didn't need interference from the feds. (See The Municipal Menace?.)

I'm wondering if the communities seeking help from EPB or Wilson Energy's Greenlight in North Carolina consider themselves to be part of a "vibrant communications marketplace." If incumbents are going to continue working to handicap those that would build gigabit networks where they don't yet exist, they need to think about what their answers to those under-served communities will be.

The need for gigabit networks is only going to increase. Simply trying to stalemate municipal efforts isn't going to change that. I personally think that's why Wheeler sees the need to engage the FCC in this process. Whether that's the right approach –- or even if the Commission has that authority –- I don't know.

But waiting for incumbents to get around to upgrading ageing copper networks in many areas seems a strategy already doomed to failure. These companies exist to make money, and if they could have done that building gigabit networks in smaller cities and towns, it would have happened by now. So if not a muni-backed network, then what?

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(14)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mhhf1ve
50%
50%
mhhf1ve,
User Rank: Light Sabre
8/6/2014 | 6:53:37 PM
Wireless balloons will save us...
Muni builds haven't had a great track record so far, but that's not a prediction of how they might perform in the future. Still, it may be up to Google and Facebook to try to disrupt the telcom monopolies. Perhaps wireless broadband delivered by drones will actually become practical (if the FAA allows commercial use of drones..).
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/31/2014 | 3:31:50 PM
Blackburn
Great blog post, Carol. 

Marsha Blackburn has done the voters of her state a favor by announcing that she's a conservative in name only, and in fact she's bought and paid for by lobbyists. 
briandnewby
50%
50%
briandnewby,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/30/2014 | 3:01:56 PM
Re: The Muni Trap
It's complicated, further, but the fact that pure wireless spectrum is an FCC thing.  I was on a city council 10 years ago looking at muni wi-fi, and cellular data service is much more affordable and common now.  Cutting the cord was a bit of a pipe dream then and now, from a phone perspective, it's very common.

There are taxation issues and city revenue impacts related to these changes as well.  Plus, on the cable side, constant disruption to citizens with road construction (even if paid by the vendor) takes an initial toll on citizen satisfaction and, quite likely, another toll on needed road repairs down the road.

All told, as nutty as it sounds, it's almost an area, really, municipal governments should exit.
kq4ym
50%
50%
kq4ym,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/29/2014 | 1:26:56 PM
Re: The Muni Trap
Yep, it's going to be hard going to get both sides of the issue pulling for the best of both world's. State's right advocates don't want Federal involvement, but there's going to have to be some compromise made to get the ball rolling smoother than it has in past years. It's not going to be easy to do battle with the companies with well paid lobbyists on their sides.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/29/2014 | 9:36:23 AM
Re: Digital divide revisited
That's only because we focus on the really important issues, like telling people whom they can marry and how they manage their reproductive systems. Snide comment aside, it is hard to imagine telecom or broadband regulations being a deciding factor in any election. Still, when rules and regs are decrepit and corrupt, it usually doesn't take much collective effort to get them changed. But it does take effort.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/28/2014 | 8:06:03 PM
Re: Digital divide revisited
I wonder if the cities that it got into a mulit-city, multi-state JV that it would trigger the FCC.

seven

PS - Kbode...I think what we have seen so far is the first to fiber wins.  And you are right, once the fiber is in it is software to upgrade a lot of bandwidth.
fgoldstein
100%
0%
fgoldstein,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/28/2014 | 6:49:45 PM
Re: The Muni Trap
Amen to Karl on multiple points.  The "gigabit" part is sizzle, not steak.  But if you have FTTH, the higher burst speed costs next to nothing.  On cable, DOCSIS 3.1 might give more downstream speed, but you can't get more than bupkis upstream (same as today) unless US sysems move to a higher split frequency.  This will never happen; the MSOs will move to fiber first (and they're in no hurry).

The muni question is tricky.  Some systems work; a well-planned and well-managed system can do okay if the incumbent competition isn't strong.  And that's where munis do best.  Overbuilds are hard to make work whether muni or not.  State laws to ban muni networks are utterly corrupt and terrible policy.  On the other hand I am not sure if the FCC or the feds in general have the authority to change it; wasn't there a previous case noting that a municipality is a creation of the state and thus its powers are only what the state gives it?

The real trouble with Tom's proposal is that it perpetates the fallacy that overbuiders are a substittue for common carriage at the physical layer.  The wire on the poles was pulled as a utility and should stay that way, available to any information service provider, not vertically integrated.  Powell's excuse was that "facilities-based competition" would do the job.  Except for a handful of munis and Google, that didn't happen, nor did the new technology he pretended would help (BPL, the equally plausible Roddenberry subspace communications, etc.) do the job. So rather than do his job, Tom's offering the false hope of muni overbuilds as the competitor to keep the incumbents in check. And he knows it won't.  I call his bluff.
KBode
100%
0%
KBode,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/28/2014 | 6:18:03 PM
Re: The Muni Trap
I agree that the obsession over 1 Gbps is a little silly, but it's more an ideal -- and the discussion isn't really whether YOU (or anybody else) thinks city builds are a good idea, and it's more about letting states decide that for themselves. The other issue at play is the problem with letting entrenched duopolies write the nation's telecom laws. That can't just be run over and past while telling towns and cities what they should or shouldn't do.

Also keep in mind, when citing how many failures there are, that most of these efforts face lawsuits and endless public relations assaults immediately out of the gate by deep-pocketed companies. Not exactly the best way to launch oneself into a new initiative...
KC-Kiwi
50%
50%
KC-Kiwi,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/28/2014 | 6:16:47 PM
Re: The Muni Trap
Your statement regarding Google Fiber availability, "where "1Gig" systems are available (in a few select areas of Kansas City...", implies that there is tokenism or cherry picking in Google's offering. If you consult the information at fiber.google.com you will see that there are significant areas of Kansas City, MO (pop 464,310) and Kansas City KS (pop 147,268) that can get Google Fiber now. Deployment is ongoing in many other Kansas City metro areas, as detailed by the interactive map at the previously mentioned Google Fiber site.

 

I find that facts are compelling when presented in a.... well, factual way. Wouldn't you agree?
Carol Wilson
100%
0%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
7/28/2014 | 6:08:06 PM
Re: Digital divide revisited
Dennis,

Unfortunately, most of the state laws were passed with little fanfare and little voter awareness. 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from Rewired
When even social service benefits require online access, 365 Data Centers is helping one Bay Area agency keep its clients connected.
Eight weeks in to getting gigabit Internet service over fiber-to-the-home, I still can't answer that question.
Some folks say they'll never forgo six-nines reliability and 50 millisecond restoration standards, but there are definite signs Web 2.0 approaches are taking hold.
After almost three decades of writing about fiber-to-the-home, I'm finally getting it and I'm going for the whole gig.
Alliance with Deloitte creates one-stop shop of cyberattack mitigation by adding governance, risk management and compliance consulting.
From The Founder
Against the odds, Huawei is growing its telecoms networking equipment business in the US -- that should be ringing some alarm bells for domestic vendors.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
CLOUD / MANAGED SERVICES: Prepping Ethernet for the Cloud
Moderator: Ray LeMaistre Panelists: Jeremy Bye, Leonard Sheahan
Between the CEOs
CEO Chat With Jeff Miller, ActiveVideo

8|28|15   |   19:05   |   (0) comments


Jeff Miller, President and CEO of ActiveVideo, talks to Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the impact of virtualization on the TV and video distribution market.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Vodafone: Mobile Money Is About Customer Trust

8|27|15   |   06.36   |   (0) comments


Light Reading spoke with Vodafone's Ian Ravenscroft about the unique responsibilities and opportunities facing operators handling customers' financial transactions over the network.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Palo Alto Networks on Expanding in the Carrier/Service Provider Market

8|26|15   |   07:54   |   (0) comments


Alfred Lee from Palo Alto Networks tells Steve Saunders about their new chassis-based system, the PA-7080, and how it can benefit service providers compared to legacy firewalls.
LRTV Custom TV
Global Services Forum Preview

8|25|15   |   02:36   |   (0) comments


Light Reading's CEO and Founder Steve Saunders talks about Huawei's upcoming Global Services Forum with the help of Heavy Reading's Patrick Donegan and Teresa Mastrangelo.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Infoblox on DNS Threat Index

8|19|15   |   04:39   |   (0) comments


Dilip Pillaipakam from Infoblox talks to Steve Saunders about his company's core network services.
Between the CEOs
CEO Chat With Ihab Tarazi, Equinix

8|14|15   |   20:18   |   (1) comment


Equinix CTO Ihab Tarazi talks to Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the dramatic changes in the data center, cloud and interconnect markets and discusses the impact of SDN and NFV in the coming years.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
The Netformx Ecosystem

8|14|15   |   09:39   |   (1) comment


Ittai Bareket, CEO of Netformx, talks with Steve Saunders about the Netformx Ecosystem, which employs cutting-edge prescriptive analytics to help solution providers maximize profits.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Versa Networks on Leveraging VNFs

8|12|15   |   07:37   |   (0) comments


Kumar Mehta, founder and CEO of stealth mode startup Versa Networks, talks with Steve Saunders about how providers can best leverage virtualized network functions (VNFs).
LRTV Custom TV
Transforming the Network Through OPNFV

8|5|15   |   7:09   |   (0) comments


Sandra Rivera, VP Data Center Group; GM Network Platforms Group, Intel Corporation, on OPNFV Arno and how the industry is coming together to accelerate the deployment of NFV and transform the network.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei ONS Product Demo

8|3|15   |   6:01   |   (0) comments


Huawei shows at Open Networking Summit 2015 in Santa Clara how its SDN and NFV solutions embrace openness.
LRTV Custom TV
End-User or Enterprise Benefits to the New IP

7|30|15   |   04:27   |   (1) comment


Andrew Coward discusses what the New IP means to end users or enterprise customers. He explains compelling reasons, including how every customer can get their own network, from the transformation to the New IP.
LRTV Custom TV
Network Visibility & the New IP

7|30|15   |   02:23   |   (0) comments


Mukund Srigopal provides an explanation of what network visibility is and how it is essential as service providers transition to the New IP. In addition, the importance of the network packet broker is discussed.
Upcoming Live Events
September 16-17, 2015, The Westin Galleria Dallas, Dallas, TX
September 16, 2015, The Westin Galleria Dallas, Dallas, TX
September 16, 2015, The Westin Galleria Dallas, Dallas, TX
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
October 14-15, 2015, New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, New Orleans, LA
November 5, 2015, Hilton Santa Clara, Santa Clara, CA
November 17, 2015, Santa Clara, California
December 1, 2015, The Westin Times Square, New York City
December 2, 2015, The Westin Times Square, New York City
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Cisco's cloud and virtualization portfolio can increase business agility and innovation by building a more flexible network architecture.
Hot Topics
Verizon Hums a Driving Tune
Sarah Thomas, Editorial Operations Director, 8/26/2015
Gogo Approved to Speed Up In-Flight WiFi
Sarah Thomas, Editorial Operations Director, 8/24/2015
Could Market Volatility Hurt Tech IPOs?
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 8/24/2015
Sprint's Claure: '3 to 5 Years' to Turnaround
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 8/25/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
September 22, 2015
Media Begins With “Me”
Webinar Archive
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Jeff Miller, President and CEO of ActiveVideo, talks to Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the impact of virtualization on the TV and video distribution market.
Equinix CTO Ihab Tarazi talks to Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders about data center, cloud and the impact of virtualization in the coming years.
Cats with Phones
Cats Are a Smartphone's Best Friend Click Here
Whoever said cats didn't live to please their humans?