& cplSiteName &

FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s

Light Reading
LR Cable News Analysis
Light Reading
7/21/2010
50%
50%

After upgrading its standard definition of broadband to 4 Mbit/s, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) says in its annual broadband deployment report that the prospects for getting high-speed Internet access to 14 to 24 million Americans in poor or rural areas that lack it are “bleak.”

When the FCC began issuing its annual broadband deployment reports in 2004, it set the standard for broadband Internet access at 200 Kbit/s. In the report it issued Wednesday, the commission says that it doesn’t consider a household a broadband-connected home unless it has a high-speed Internet connection with a minimum download speed of 4 Mbit/s and upstream speed of 1 Mbit/s. (See FCC: Up to 24M Lack Broadband Access.)

“This is a minimum speed generally required for using today’s video-rich broadband applications and services, while retaining sufficient capacity for basic web browsing and email,” the FCC said in the report, adding that the standard will “evolve over time.”

The FCC said that it found that up to 24 million Americans don’t have broadband Internet access under the new standard. It used the findings to call for Universal Service Fund reform and as additional basis for its pursuit of a broader National Broadband Plan.

The Commission also called for “innovative approaches to unleashing new spectrum, and removal of barriers to infrastructure investment.”

Two FCC commissioners said they opposed the findings of the report. Republican commissioner Meredith Baker took issue with the 4-Mbit/s standard, noting that the report found that half of Americans with access to such speeds opt for slower and less expensive high-speed Internet packages. Baker also complained that the report focused “almost exclusively on terrestrial broadband options,” and didn’t address satellite broadband, 3G, and 4G wireless Internet products.

Fellow Republican commissioner Robert McDowell noted in his dissent that the report focused too much on subscriber counts instead of deployment of high-speed Internet services, and the availability of broadband. “Collecting granular data, including subscribership numbers, is important. But subscribership data does not equate to the availability of broadband, which is what Congress requires the Commission to assess,” McDowell said.

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) is still reviewing the report, spokesman Brian Dietz said.

The American Cable Association (ACA) said MSOs have been pulling their weight in rural areas and called on the FCC to alleviate capital-sapping regulations so more can be allocated toward broadband deployment.

"The broadband deficit identified by the FCC would be a lot worse if ACA members hadn’t been aggressive broadband deployment leaders over the past decade in rural America," said Matthew Polka, president and CEO of the org, which represents many tier 2 and tier 3 MSOs. "The FCC can help ACA members allocate their scarce capital more effectively on behalf of consumers’ broadband needs by minimizing costly and burdensome regulations in other areas, such as retreating from strict reliance on expensive CableCARD-enabled set-top boxes when more affordable options would serve cable subscribers better."

Both AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) and Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) said they disagreed with the findings of the report. AT&T senior vice president of regulatory affairs Bob Quinn wrote in a post on the company’s blog that the report found that 7 million homes without access to wireline broadband service all have access to satellite-based broadband. “Some of those areas today receive thousands of dollars annually per line to support the provision of voice service,” Quinn added.

Verizon senior vice president for regulatory affairs Kathleen Grillo said the FCC’s conclusion is “hard to understand.”

“It makes no sense that, after the National Broadband Plan concluded that 95 percent of Americans have access to wireline broadband, the FCC majority now suggests broadband deployment is not reasonable and timely,” Grillo said in a statement.

Free Press research director Derek Turner cheered the findings of the report. “The facts present a sobering reality of our broadband problem. We pay far too much for far too little, and the lack of meaningful competition among Internet service providers leads to delayed investment and slow technological progress,” Turner said, in a statement.

— Steve Donohue, Special to Light Reading Cable

(15)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
rjmcmahon
50%
50%
rjmcmahon,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:15 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


On availability (per McDowell); From what I can tell there is availability of Ferrari's so maybe the FCC could serve the public interests by assessing that?  Urghh, or just maybe assess things like affordability, job creation (or not), etc.  You know, some real stuff instead of the b.s. rhetoric.


On investment (per Turner):  If competition stimulates investment then we need to be eliminating patents, copyrights (and trademarks) as well as all other state granted (and enforced) monopolies.  The argument there is without the state granted monopolies there would be no research but somehow with broadband it's the lack of competition that keeps investors from sinking their money into a modern comm infrastructure.  Can't have it both ways.

rjmcmahon
50%
50%
rjmcmahon,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:14 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


Sounds like it may not be a technical thing but rather a poltical/economic thing, i.e. a way to get a money to rural telcos.  In that context they can "tax" the urban centers which already have over 4/1Mbs and send the money to the rural areas which don't have 4/1mbs.  From a public interest perspective speeds and feeds aren't as important as things like open access and carrier/colo neutrality.

macemoneta
50%
50%
macemoneta,
User Rank: Moderator
12/5/2012 | 4:29:14 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


We're talking about wired/fiber connectivity, not wireless, right?  10Mbit/sec today should be the low end.  100Mbit/sec symmetrical should be the norm, and 1Gbit/sec should be the goal (since other countries already have this deployed) - for $29.99/month.  Is the FCC still partying like it's 1999?  After the hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies we've provided, shouldn't we at least have parity with other countries?

Jeff Baumgartner
50%
50%
Jeff Baumgartner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:13 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


Yeah, the way i read it, the 4mbit/s is for wired transmission, not wireless, which is why i think is part of the reason the definition they put forth is raising some hackles and some important questions. JB

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:12 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


I guess beyond access bit rates I would really like to see some control or specification of oversubscription and latency.


The Access Bit Rate is an interesting number.  But the rest of number would help people compare choices as well.  It might provide a baseline in the long term for carriers to sell their bit pipes at different rates but supporting different services.  Right now, consumers have no way of doing these comparisons and the FCC has no way to figure out how to make services behave.


Theoretically, I can offer you a 1 Gb/s interface at your home and backhaul it over a 56K Modem.  I recognize this is an extreme and would not happen in practice.  But less extreme examples are completely reasonable and provide some understanding of the service that is being provided.  Standards for measurement could be put in place and that could be a very good thing for newer apps.


seven


 

Duh!
50%
50%
Duh!,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 4:29:10 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


Seven


There was a public notice, DA-09 2474, establishing a pleading cycle on broadband measurement, comment date December 14.   This was one of a gazillion items under the National Broadband Plan.  The FCC website being the mess that it is, it's not clear from a cursory look what became of that.  Something tells me that it's backed up in the Comcast fiasco.  I agree with you (I think we're saying the same thing) that a really good set of metrics, and a duty to disclose, would do more for consumers and to enhance competition than all the Network Neutrality hoo-hah combined.

Jeff Baumgartner
50%
50%
Jeff Baumgartner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:10 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


Anyone care how that 4mbit/s down is being defined? Getting a burst rate is one thing, but sustaining it for a service group in a bandwidth sharing archtiecture could be another.  I'll have to take a closer look at the report and see if they make that distinction. JB

Jeff Baumgartner
50%
50%
Jeff Baumgartner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:09 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


Ah, okay, I got it now.  Yep, hard to made that kind of a definition without qualifiying it as with QoS, best effort, etc.  JB

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:09 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


Jeff,


 


That is what Duh and I were getting at.


 


Duh,


Thanks!  I agree 100%


 


seven


 

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:29:08 PM
re: FCC: Broadband Starts at 4 Mbit/s


 


So, let me use your term "best effort" as it relates to the 4/1 service offering.  Let's say that means that your access port is rate limited to those speeds (4 Mb/s toward you, 1 Mb/s from you) and that this is a burst capability. 


You still don't have enough of a definition to know if the service could do VoIP effectively, even if it wasn't blocked or degraded.  Latency and Packet Jitter can screw this up.  The reason that we have those is that Internet Services are oversubscribed and we don't currently have a model that defines what it would mean to offer any service that is sensitive to those (or one of several other) parameters.


So, my commentary is that if we want to regulate the service offerings (and I think Duh! here is in agreement with this) we could define what acceptable service is and measure it. We could even make different capabilities of offerings and price them differently.  Now what that would do would be to provide a way of rolling out service at a baseline, but allow advanced applications (which might require different parameters than baseline service) to be served as well.


Now before you all define this as a new way of doing business, it is actually quite an old way of doing business.  You had POTS lines, but you also had conditioned lines.  You paid extra for line conditioning, but you could run more data across them.


The issue is that we have no standards for any of this and no way currently to effectively monitor compliance to spec.  When I worked for Racal-Milgo, we built leased line modems that measured the line conditioning and had NMS systems that printed out graphs that matched the definitions that the phone companies used.  That way lines that were improperly conditioned could be rebated for.


So, instead of having a 4/1 service...you might have a choice of 3 - 4 4/1 services:


4/1 Browsing and Mail service - true best effort


4/1 VoIP capable


4/1 Gaming


4/1 Video Streaming


Of course, these could change over time...but now you are getting to the problem of the cap (for example the video streaming service would have a much higher cap or maybe unlimited).  It would allow a baseline service maybe decrease in price.


seven


 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Light Reading’s Upskill U is a FREE, interactive, online educational resource that delivers must-have education on themes that relate to the overall business transformation taking place in the communications industry.
NEXT COURSE
Wednesday, September 28, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit 101
Will Barkis, Senior Technology Analyst, Orange
UPCOMING COURSE SCHEDULE
Friday, September 30, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & the Great Migration
Robert Howald, Vice President, Network Architecture, Comcast
Wednesday, October 5, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & Smart Cities
Joe Kochan, COO & Co-Founder, US Ignite
Friday, October 7, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & DOCSIS 3.1
Ty Pearman, Director, Access Architecture, Comcast
in association with:
From The Founder
Light Reading today starts a new voyage as part of a larger Enterprise.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Interviews
Global Services: The $40B Face-Off

9|26|16   |   05:53   |   (0) comments


More service providers than ever before are battling it out to win a slice of what is now a $40 billion global communications services pie, explains Ovum Principal Analyst David Molony.
LRTV Documentaries
MEC Congress: The Key Takeaways

9|22|16   |   03:25   |   (3) comments


Three key takeaways from the Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) Congress in Munich, Germany.
Wagner’s Ring
Time to Shut Up About 'Dumb Pipes'

9|22|16   |     |   (12) comments


Service providers can't compete with OTT players. It just isn't in their DNA. Instead, service providers need to embrace what they're good at -- providing reliable, secure connectivity.
Wagner’s Ring
Keeping Your Tech Career Going After 50

9|21|16   |     |   (13) comments


How do you keep your career moving forward when you're past the half-century mark?
LRTV Interviews
Peering Into the Digital Future

9|20|16   |   04:25   |   (0) comments


Nick Thomas, practice leader of digital media at Ovum, talks about how digital transformation in the technology, media and telecom sectors will enable the development of a new range of applications and services for enterprises and consumers and how the upcoming Digital Futures event in London will examine ...
LRTV Custom TV
Napatech Tackles NFV's Major Challenge

9|7|16   |   08:42   |   (0) comments


One of the main challenges for network operators introducing NFV is to combine performance and flexibility in a cost-effective way, but there is a solution, explains Napatech's Dan Joe Barry.
LRTV Custom TV
Huawei Optical Innovation 2016

9|6|16   |     |   (0) comments


Highlights of the 2016 Huawei Optical Innovation forum.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Are You Ready for Huawei Connect 2016?

8|31|16   |     |   (0) comments


Join us for an exclusive sneak peak of Huawei Connect, an integrated conference for the global ICT ecosystem taking place in Shanghai.
Between the CEOs
CEO Chat: UXP's Gemini Waghmare

8|26|16   |     |   (0) comments


Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders and UXP Systems CEO Gemini Waghmare discuss the strategic importance of digital identity for operators in the midst of transformation.
LRTV Custom TV
F5 Virtual Network Function Integrations With Partner Orchestration Platform

8|24|16   |   6:38   |   (0) comments


F5's Kishore Patnam, product manager for F5's service provider solutions, discusses why service providers are moving towards virtualization and how his clients are utilizing F5's solutions.
Between the CEOs
CEO Chat: Intel's Alexis Black Bjorlin

8|17|16   |   06:23   |   (0) comments


Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Accelerating Telecom Digital Transformation With Nominum DNS

8|1|16   |   12:04   |   (0) comments


Light Reading's Steve Saunders gets an update from Nominum CEO Gary Messiana on how his company is helping carriers on the digital transformation journey.
Upcoming Live Events
November 3, 2016, The Montcalm Marble Arch, London
November 30, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York City
December 1, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
December 6-8, 2016, The Westin Excelsior, Rome
May 16-17, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Hot Topics
Keeping Your Tech Career Going After 50
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 9/21/2016
Time to Shut Up About 'Dumb Pipes'
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 9/22/2016
Comcast Will Go Wireless in 2017
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 9/20/2016
Sprint CEO: We'll Lease Spectrum as Soon as Possible
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 9/20/2016
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders and UXP Systems CEO Gemini Waghmare discuss the strategic importance of digital identity for operators in the midst of transformation.
Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
Animals with Phones
You Thought Your Customer Service Was Unreliable... Click Here
Live Digital Audio

A vital part of increasing the number of women in comms is transforming the ways companies can support and empower women. While progressive company policies that support both men and women in achieving work-life balance are a step in the right direction, creating a company culture that supports those policies can at times be more challenging.

During this show, we'll talk to Lynn Comp, Senior Director of Industry and Sales Enabling (ISE) in the Network Platforms Group at Intel, about why those challenges exist and how companies can overcome them. She'll provide insight into how Intel has worked to create a culture that supports work-life balance, and provide steps and guidance for other companies wishing to do the same. We will also leave plenty of time to get your questions answered live on the air.