Light Reading
With the start of Connect America Phase II, the FCC is accepting challenges on whether individual census blocks are being adequately served by existing broadband providers.

FCC: Are You Being Served?

Mari Silbey
7/2/2014
50%
50%

Is your census block being served by an unsubsidized broadband provider? That's the question the FCC is putting to the test with the start of the Connect America Phase II challenge process.

The goal of the Connect America Fund is to provide $1.8 billion in ongoing annual financial support for organizations trying to extend broadband connectivity in high-cost areas. However, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) doesn't want to subsidize efforts in regions that are already being well served by commercial network providers. As a result, the agency is relying on a map of census blocks deemed eligible for funding based on three criteria.

Eligible areas must be considered unserved by an unsubsidized competitor, meet the qualifications for designation as a high-cost region, and be located in a "price cap" territory where existing providers are already contending with network access lines that are price-regulated.

The challenge process only applies to the first funding criterion. Parties submitting challenges must file with the FCC by August 14.

The Connect America Fund is a hot-button issue because current broadband providers don't want to run up against competitors that have what they see as unfair financial advantages. As such, the FCC is trying to walk a fine line between extending broadband service and not stepping on the toes of existing cable and telecom operators.

Many broadband providers, meanwhile, have been aggressive about trying to keep competitors at bay, whether they receive government funding or not. These efforts include encouraging state-level legal restrictions on community-owned broadband services. Some legislators are fighting back against those restrictions. Most recently, several Democratic members of Congress sent a letter to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler urging him to promote competition and allow communities to decide for themselves how to invest in local broadband infrastructure. (See Dems Urge FCC Action to Protect Muni Nets.)

For the Connect America Fund challenge process, the FCC is pointing citizens to its online challenge process guide. The agency will review all submissions at the end of the 45-day challenge period.

— Mari Silbey, special to Light Reading

(8)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/3/2014 | 10:24:47 AM
Re: Urban Renewal
Costs depend on the site and style of deployment.  It is impossible to create a single number, especially given that Unions are involved in some situations.

I am telling you (not giving you opinion) about what is being spoken about here in terms of regulation.  You can have any opinion that you want, but it is rural independent carriers that are subsidized.  You said in your first post that this was about urban deployment.  High Cost Loops is straight USAC.  Read the following link:

http://usac.org/hc/legacy/telecom-carriers/step01/hcl.aspx

seven

 
jabailo
50%
50%
jabailo,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 11:24:34 PM
Re: Urban Renewal
You raise good arguments, but they are unquantified (like mine).

What exactly is the cost (per meter) of maintaining a fiber optical cable?

What is the cost of an LTE antenna/site designed for broadband access?

As I understand it, yes, you can put more users per cable/antenna -- but that doesn't mean each will get more speed and use.  These resources are like party lines.  Cramming the most per unit resource is the idea.

However, at some point, if the costs become so cheap and so easy to maintain, then it behooves them to put it everywhere.

 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 10:34:33 PM
Re: Urban Renewal
jabailo,

Then you clearly need to rethink a whole lot of things.

The longest loop that I had to deal with was 80 miles and served a single home.  The line had to be installed by the Carrier of Last Resort for free.  This is an extreme illustration to help you see what you are missing:

- The number of homes served per mile of construction is much lower in rural America.  You can run a multi-fiber cable and support 1,000s of homes from one cable run through the manhole covered installation.

- The support costs to manage those remote installations are very high.  Cable breaks and equipment problems mean long trips to fix things for a few subscribers.

- Imagine the cost of installing an LTE antenna for a single home.  Before you scoff, the least dense phone company that I was aware of was Valley Telephone which was 7500 subs in 6500 square miles.  

That is why those companies get a huge amount of support for their networks.  Which is the whole point about unsubsidized companies.  AT&T and Verizon have the vast bulk of their connections in what is considered to be low cost areas so are not subsidized.

This is not speculation by the way.  It is the way the regulatory framework is constructed.  The 3rd bit that you should not is the "Price Cap" verbage in the original article.  There are still some small Incumbent LECs that are "Rate of Return" carriers.

seven

 

 
jabailo
50%
50%
jabailo,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 8:16:00 PM
Re: Urban Renewal
Let me suggest another form of "competition".

Big cities are political and econonmic entities.

They have expensive real estate, they have high paying jobs, and they sell themselves by presumably offering something that you cannot get in the suburbs or rural areas.

Fast forward to the 21st century.

Now I can get 1Gig of fiber on my 2 acre summer home in the mountains, while my co-workers are sweating it out in the heat, and not able to get a halfway decent signal because of the reflections of the apartments.

Sounds like someone might get a little worried about their...investments.

 
jabailo
50%
50%
jabailo,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 8:13:39 PM
Re: Urban Renewal
It would seem to me that stringing a single fiber cable along the telephone poles along a rural route or sticking a single Wimax or LTE antenna on a farm plain would be a lot less costly than having to go run the same cable by going down into manholes or scotch taping a bunch of plane "reflectors" on the side of every building.

But that's just how I think.

 
kq4ym
50%
50%
kq4ym,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 7:58:20 PM
Re: Urban Renewal
It could be argued by some that it should be ok to "step on the toes" of the big guys. In order to bring competition and presumably better service at reasonable cost to the rural areas, the government might just allow that competition that indeed would hurt the profits of the existing guys a little bit.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 7:37:38 PM
Re: Urban Renewal
Note the commentary in the 2nd paragraph particularly the words "high cost".  Read that as rural.  

Now read "unsubsidized" in the first paragraph as Verizon, AT&T and some of Centurylink. 

That should help your comprehension immensely.

 

seven
jabailo
50%
50%
jabailo,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/2/2014 | 12:11:40 PM
Urban Renewal
This sounds like the urban version of the rural broadband acts that were passed.  It's ironic because some of these rural areas, where there aren't even towns, now are getting Google speed optical fiber, and higher than average cable connectivity, thanks to the Government's push.

Meanwhile, there are areas in "high tech" cities like Seattle that get speeds barely considered broadband any more!    Over time it seems like any and all wired connectivity will become optical fiber.  And phone service will end up all being 5G.   But someone has to turn the first shovel...

 
Educational Resources
sponsor supplied content
Educational Resources Archive
Flash Poll
LRTV Custom TV
VeEX – Live from the Show

8|21|14   |   5:58   |   (0) comments


An overview of VeEX Test and Measurement solutions including TX300S multi-service test set with VeExpress cloud-based management system, UX400 universal modular platform supporting 100G testing, and the redesigned RXT modular platform.
LRTV Custom TV
Transitioning CE 2.0 Networks Into the SDN & NFV Era With Telco Systems

8|19|14   |   5:19   |   (0) comments


Telco Systems' Ariel Efrati (CEO) and Moshe Shimon (VP of Product Management) discuss virtualization and how the company's new Open Metro Edge solution utilizes the SDN and NFV concepts to accelerate and orchestrate service delivery through its innovative product portfolio and software applications.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Myths: Is NFV Still Several Years Away?

8|11|14   |   1:13   |   (0) comments


Some say that NFV (network functions virtualization) is still several years away from being implemented on mobile operator networks. This isn't the case. Operators can get started on their paths to NFV now, as this short video from Skyfire shows.
LRTV Custom TV
A New Security Paradigm in SDN/NFV

7|28|14   |   02:54   |   (0) comments


Paul Shaneck, Global Director Network Solutions for Symantec, discusses the evolving virtualized network, explaining how Symantec is leading the security discussion as it relates to SDN and NFV, and helping to ensure the network is protected and compliant.
LRTV Documentaries
Sprint's Network Evolution

7|24|14   |   14:59   |   (0) comments


Sprint's Jay Bluhm gives a keynote speech at the Big Telecom Event (BTE) about Sprint's network and services evolution strategy, including Spark.
LRTV Documentaries
BTE Keynote: The Software-Defined Operator

7|24|14   |   18:43   |   (1) comment


Deutsche Telekom's Axel Clauberg explains the concept of the software-defined operator to the Big Telecom Event (BTE) crowd.
Light Reedy
Numbers Are In: LR's 2014 Salary Survey

7|24|14   |   1:25   |   (7) comments


Our fourth annual Salary Survey paints a picture of who's hiring, firing, earning, and yearning for a change in the telecom industry.
LRTV Custom TV
Driving the Network Transformation

7|23|14   |   4:29   |   (0) comments


Intel's Sandra Rivera discusses network transformation and how Intel technologies, programs, and standards body efforts have helped the industry migration to SDN and NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
Distributed NFV-Based Business Services by RAD

7|18|14   |   5:38   |   (0) comments


With the ETSI-approved Distributed NFV PoC running in the background, RAD's CEO, Dror Bin, talks about why D-NFV makes compelling sense for service providers, and about the dollars and cents RAD is putting behind D-NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
MRV Accelerating Packet Optical Convergence

7|15|14   |   6:06   |   (0) comments


Giving you network insight to make your network smarter.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV-Enabled Ethernet for Generating New Revenues

7|15|14   |   5:49   |   (0) comments


Cyan's Planet Orchestrate allows service providers and their end-customers to activate software-based capabilities such as firewalls and encryption on top of existing Ethernet services in just minutes.
LRTV Custom TV
Symkloud NVF-Ready Video Transcoding, Big Data

7|9|14   |   3:41   |   (0) comments


Kontron and ISV partner Vantrix demonstrate high-performance video transcoding and data analytic solutions on same 2U standard platform that is ready for SDN and NFV deployments made by mobile, cable and cloud operators.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 23, 2014, Denver, CO
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
Today's Cartoon
Hot Topics
Level 3 Does Big Data Differently
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 8/21/2014
IoT Alert: Samsung Snaps Up SmartThings
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 8/15/2014
Comcast Streams Back to School
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 8/21/2014
Line-Powered Phone Lines: A Hot Topic Again
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 8/20/2014
Analyst: Ericsson, Oracle Top Shrinking SDP World
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 8/19/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed