Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

Jonestown  
Dan Jones

Firefox: Smartphones for All?

February 26, 2013 | Dan Jones |
The Firefox mobile OS is burning up the show here in Barcelona.

The Mozilla booth has been thronged with curious attendees all day. Carriers such as Telefonica are palpably excited about having another real open-source alternative to Android. Hell, the very orange Firefox knit hat -- with ears! -- might even be the chic geek accessory to have in chilly Barcelona. [Ed note: Maybe for those without a fashion sense to spare.]

The reasons why are easy to see: Carriers love free open-source operating systems because it helps to drive down the cost of the smartphone. This is particularly important as they look to sell cheap smartphones -- think $100 or less -- and seriously cheap data plans in countries where $200-plus devices just aren't an option.

In addition, some operators outside the U.S. aren't so keen on Google's Android strategy because Google stores emails that can be accessed on the Android phones on U.S.-based servers, which can cause regulatory issues. This has opened the door for an alternative such as Firefox.

The pure Web and HTML5-based nature of Firefox will also make it attractive to developers looking for the next cash cow after iOS.

Certainly, Firefox phones don't have to be an iPhone killer (or whatever bogus terminology is now in use) to succeed. They just have to work well enough, proliferate like Android and give many people a cheap and reliable way to get on the Web.

I can certainly think of some problems ahead. A smartphone that is someone's main connection to the world in many countries needs a good, reliable mobile payments and banking infrastructure.

From my limited research so far, I'm seeing some interesting apps but not everything I would think needed yet. I'm sure Mozilla and its supporters will move to address that.

Still, Firefox seems like the most interesting new contender we've seen in the mobile OS field for a while.

— Dan Jones, Site Editor, Light Reading Mobile



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
More Jonestown
Sun, Sea, Sand & Signaling
Could Firefox be the chatty OS that makes a beached whale of your network?
A Sync Standards Rumble at the Edge?
Everyone agrees that standards are good to stitch together networks made of 4G, small cells and even Wi-Fi, but there's much less accord over which standards to use to actually to get it done
What's Holding Back Video Chat?
6:00 AM More carriers need to adopt RCS 5.0 if the concept of in-app, cross-network, mobile video chat is to flourish
Stitching Together Wi-Fi, 4G & More
1:50 PM Creating a seamless broadband experience across a variety of networks is one of the challenges of 2013
MobileCON 2012: Mobile in Flux
8:00 AM Can either Sprint or T-Mobile grow their subscriber base as an unlimited 4G operator?
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured
Docsis Provisioning of EPON (DPoE)
CableLabs spec that blends Docsis-style provisioning with EPON