Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

Valley Wonk  
Craig Matsumoto

Virtualization Takes the Stage at Interop

May 07, 2013 | Craig Matsumoto |
Sandwiched between Cisco and Juniper in Wednesday morning's Interop keynotes will be a panel with VMware Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Broadcom Corp.

It's amusing because Cisco and Juniper, even though they've been accommodating toward software-defined networking (SDN), represent the old guard. VMware, Microsoft and Broadcom, combined, represent the new look of the network.

The central question that's on many people's minds is whether (or to what extent) Cisco and Juniper's equipment franchises will be damaged by the commodity boxes due to SDN and network functions virtualization (NFV). Cisco and Juniper might not want to talk about it, but the panel certainly will.

Regardless of where you think SDN is heading, hardware is already heading down a new path. This got pointed out to me last week by Martin Casado, a founder of Nicira and now a chief architect at VMware. It's happening in the large data centers, where the middle of the network has become very simple: handfuls of Layer 3 connectivity, and not much else. Other features are becoming compute-based functions at the edge, running on general-purpose processors. This pattern emerged on its own, Casado says.

What's emerging from that is a Wintel-like model, one where the strengths lie in the chips, provided by Broadcom and a few other players (including Intel Corp., if it has its way), and the software, represented by Microsoft and VMware.

So here on this panel, you'll have three of the biggest companies that stand to benefit from this trend. Sandwiched around them will be the router companies that do preach SDN but still have hardware franchises to protect.

I don't know exactly what Cisco and Juniper will be talking about. But it's possible both their keynotes will be overshadowed by what the panel between them has to say.

(By the way, Facebook is giving the fourth Wednesday keynote, talking about the Open Compute Project -- another source of drama for the hardware providers.)

— Craig Matsumoto, Managing Editor, Light Reading



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Going Soft at MWC

SPONSORED BY
More Valley Wonk
The Case for Flexibility Beyond 100G
Comcast joins Google in asking for a flexible-rate optical standard, rather than 400G or terabit, but that's easier said than done
SDN Still Needs a Gathering Like ONS
The Open Networking Summit has climbed the hype curve, but the conference should cling to its roots as a techie discussion forum for software-defined networking
What OpenDaylight Really Wants to Do
The coalition's chairman says all these companies plan to further the SDN cause and don't have a 'nefarious' angle
Cisco Sees Daylight for SDN
Big vendors are reportedly banding together to unify SDN's approach but is it more about steering the conversation?
Coherent Turns 5
Forget Pi Day. Let's talk about optical milestones and the legacy of Nortel
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured
Trill
A Spanning Tree alternative in Ethernet networks