Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

Valley Wonk  
Craig Matsumoto

Juniper Cracking SDN Open

December 13, 2012 | Craig Matsumoto |

5:00 AM -- Juniper Networks Inc. isn't commenting on why it's acquiring Contrail Systems, but it seems likely the startup could be the basis for an open-source software-defined networking (SDN) controller. (See Juniper Buys Contrail for (More) SDN Smarts.)

Open-source technology would be Juniper's way to combat its larger competitors in the data center market, as Brad Brooks, vice president of the company's software division, told Light Reading earlier this fall.

Cisco Systems Inc. and VMware Inc. will produce their own proprietary controllers and are big enough for that to succeed, Brooks said. Other rivals, such as IBM Corp., might rely on outside controllers -- Big Switch would be a possibility -- but they've got established data-center customers to help pull them into the SDN age.

How does a company such as Juniper, which Brooks pegged as having 5 percent of the data-center switching market, stand up against that? The answer is to nurture an environment of open-source components, one where an outsider's gear can easily slip into place as a second or third source, he said.

"We believe that effort is going to arise. There are just too many interested parties based on the opportunities that this creates," Brooks said.

So Contrail -- which Juniper announced Wednesday it's buying for $176 million in cash and stock -- could have a controller that Juniper will eventually push as an open-source offering.

It seems likely, considering Juniper must have known what Contrail was doing from very early on. The SDNCentral blog mentions rumors that Contrail has been a Juniper spin-in all along. If that's the case, then Juniper has adopted the same approach as Cisco with Insieme Networks Inc., and Alcatel-Lucent, with Nuage Networks. (See Cisco Outlines an SDN Plan and Alcatel-Lucent Has a Top-Secret SDN Startup!.)

Juniper at least invested in Contrail, Executive Vice President Robert Muglia noted in a brief blog entry Wednesday.

Every vendor talks about having this open, standards-based approach, but it's yet to be seen how far down that path Cisco and VMware will go. This is Juniper's chance to take the moral high ground -- in the eyes of open-source fans, anyway -- while also seeding the market with a controller that, by definition, will welcome Juniper's gear (or anybody's).

The other possibility is that Juniper has given up on open source and is making its own proprietary controller play. But that sounds suicidal, unless Contrail has found the Cosmic Cube of SDN architectures.

Best not to think about that.

— Craig Matsumoto, Managing Editor, Light Reading



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Going Soft at MWC

SPONSORED BY
More Valley Wonk
The Case for Flexibility Beyond 100G
Comcast joins Google in asking for a flexible-rate optical standard, rather than 400G or terabit, but that's easier said than done
Virtualization Takes the Stage at Interop
Cisco, Juniper and other more traditional Interop speakers might get overshadowed by the forces of virtualization
SDN Still Needs a Gathering Like ONS
The Open Networking Summit has climbed the hype curve, but the conference should cling to its roots as a techie discussion forum for software-defined networking
What OpenDaylight Really Wants to Do
The coalition's chairman says all these companies plan to further the SDN cause and don't have a 'nefarious' angle
Cisco Sees Daylight for SDN
Big vendors are reportedly banding together to unify SDN's approach but is it more about steering the conversation?
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured
EPON Protocol Over Coax (EPoC)
Bringing PON speeds to hybrid fiber/coax