Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

Valley Wonk  
Craig Matsumoto

Tellabs vs. Sycamore

February 01, 2013 | Craig Matsumoto |
Here's a sobering outlook for Tellabs Inc.:

"The mostly likely scenario appears to be a slow wind-down during which most of the cash is returned to shareholders," writes analyst Mike Genovese of MKM Partners, in a report issued Friday.

In other words, he thinks Tellabs could go "gently into that good night." That's what he titled his report, anyway.

Coincidentally, that's what Sycamore Networks Inc. did on Friday. Completing a plan laid out in October, Sycamore's shareholders voted to liquidate the company, minus the Intelligent Bandwidth Management business, which got sold to Marlin Equity Partners. (See Sycamore Prepares to Shut Down.)

Both companies were optical high-fliers around the turn of the century that found themselves with lots of cash after the bubble peaked. What they've got in common is that neither managed to build a fully revived business from that bankroll.

But Tellabs tried. Sycamore, by contrast, seemed to shore up for the long winter. Even in early 2005 -- eight years ago! -- we were talking about Sycamore possibly closing up shop. (See Will Sycamore Call It a Day? and Sycamore Being Sycamore.)

Tellabs, meanwhile, acquired Advanced Fibre Communications (AFC) in 2004 for $1.5 billion to move into the access business, only to find out how unkind a business it is. By 2008, it was clear Tellabs needed another new direction. (See Tellabs Kills Its Verizon GPON Efforts and TLAB Shakeup Coming.)

More recently, Tellabs had a couple of flops -- the SmartCore 9100 for mobile-network cores and the 9200 edge router, which the company discontinued on Thursday. (See Tellabs Axes Product, Cuts Jobs.)

It's not the greatest highlight reel, but what does Sycamore have to show for the past several years? A story in The Wall Street Journal Friday notes Sycamore "distributed more than $750 million in special dividends over the past three years." Maybe that's nice math for shorter-term shareholders, but I think most of us would prefer to see a company identify and invest in evolutionary market strategies, much like Tellabs continues to do.

— Craig Matsumoto, Managing Editor, Light Reading



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
More Valley Wonk
The Case for Flexibility Beyond 100G
Comcast joins Google in asking for a flexible-rate optical standard, rather than 400G or terabit, but that's easier said than done
Virtualization Takes the Stage at Interop
Cisco, Juniper and other more traditional Interop speakers might get overshadowed by the forces of virtualization
SDN Still Needs a Gathering Like ONS
The Open Networking Summit has climbed the hype curve, but the conference should cling to its roots as a techie discussion forum for software-defined networking
What OpenDaylight Really Wants to Do
The coalition's chairman says all these companies plan to further the SDN cause and don't have a 'nefarious' angle
Cisco Sees Daylight for SDN
Big vendors are reportedly banding together to unify SDN's approach but is it more about steering the conversation?
Related Content
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured