Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

Valley Wonk  
Craig Matsumoto

LINX Wants Its 100G

June 02, 2010 | Craig Matsumoto |

4:50 PM -- Want to hear another provider talking about needing 100 Gbit/s right away? Sure you do.

The London Internet Exchange Ltd. (LINX) wants to put in 100-Gbit/s Ethernet connections and will start link-aggregating them once they're "cost-effective -- and for us, cost-effective is probably earlier" than for most, says Richard Yule, LINX sales and marketing manager.

In the absence of 100-Gbit/s Ethernet, LINX has settled for aggregating 10-Gbit/s Ethernet links -- that is, combining them so that the network considers them a single pipe. Sixteen of them make up a virtual 160-Gbit/s Ethernet connection, and that's the maximum LINX has been able to do so far.

Today, Brocade Communications Systems Inc. announced denser blades for its MRX line of routers, providing 16 10-Gbit/s Ethernet ports per slot. (The blades carry eight ports each and fit in half-slots.) That makes possible the aggregation of 32 ports into a 320-Gbit/s pipe, something Foundry Networks talked about in 2008, before getting bought by Brocade. (See Brocade Ups 10GE Density and Foundry LAGs Ahead.)

But even that just puts things off for a few months, Yule says.

The question with any of these urgent-need cases is the volume. LINX's 160-Gbit/s aggregated links are used at three core locations, while the rest of the network is OK with aggregating four 10-Gbit/s Ethernet links.

But where it's needed, it's really needed. Peak traffic rates on the LINX network exceed 600 Gbit/s. "That's not a peak that lasts for a few seconds; it stays up there for much of the day," Yule says. "We're going to have to go to 100 Gbit/s in quite a major way in the near future."

Brocade has a niche with some of these big exchanges. (See Dutch Exchange Sticks With Brocade and Brocade Claims Top IXPs.) So, company officials say they'll be putting a focus on 100-Gbit/s Ethernet, and it sounds as if they'll give it more urgency than 40 Gbit/s.

— Craig Matsumoto, West Coast Editor, Light Reading



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
More Valley Wonk
The Case for Flexibility Beyond 100G
Comcast joins Google in asking for a flexible-rate optical standard, rather than 400G or terabit, but that's easier said than done
Virtualization Takes the Stage at Interop
Cisco, Juniper and other more traditional Interop speakers might get overshadowed by the forces of virtualization
SDN Still Needs a Gathering Like ONS
The Open Networking Summit has climbed the hype curve, but the conference should cling to its roots as a techie discussion forum for software-defined networking
What OpenDaylight Really Wants to Do
The coalition's chairman says all these companies plan to further the SDN cause and don't have a 'nefarious' angle
Cisco Sees Daylight for SDN
Big vendors are reportedly banding together to unify SDN's approach but is it more about steering the conversation?
Related Content
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured