5 Reasons to Ignore Automation

Dennis Mendyk
10/24/2017
100%
0%

By this point, you may already be growing tired of the automation hype cycle. That's too bad, because as hype cycles go, this one is just getting started. By this time next year, you'll probably be feeling nostalgic for simpler days, when NFV was the leader of all hype, with 5G running a reasonably close second.

Ever mindful of its role as the telecom industry's most reliable trendspotter, Heavy Reading has just released a report that puts telecom automation in perspective -- or make that perspectives. Telecom Automation: Heavy Reading Perspectives delivers observations and insights from Heavy Reading's analyst team on the coming new automation age and how it will affect telecom industry ecosystems in these areas:

  • Emerging technologies and services, such as IoT
  • B/OSS transformation
  • Analytics
  • NFV MANO initiatives
  • Wide-area network deployments (SD-WAN)
  • 5G
  • Network security

That's a lot of ground to cover. And some of that ground is going to feel painful to tread for one simple reason: The telecom industry's road to automation is nothing but an uphill climb, and that journey is just beginning. And it's a steep, steep hill. Tree lines will be involved. And an encounter with the occasional yeti isn't out of the question.

Reasonable people facing a daunting, seemingly unending, and probably thankless task would ask a simple question: Why bother? As with all daunting, seemingly unending and probably thankless tasks, there are plenty of reasons to forgo the pain and leave the work to somebody else. These five almost immediately come to mind:

  1. Automation is hard. Really hard. Compared with true automation, virtualizing piece parts of a network is about as difficult as opening a screw-top bottle of Merlot. Automation will require bringing tens of thousands of those virtualized piece-parts together to create a machine that would let go of itself.

  2. It's going to take a long time to build an autonomous network. To borrow the well-used line from John Maynard Keynes: In the long run we are all dead -- or enjoying the golden years scouting the early-bird specials and complaining about how much better the world used to be. If you remember what things were like before Al Gore invented the Internet, you may be put out to pasture before the job is done. So why do all this work to make things easier for some kids you don't even know?

  3. The web guys have a huge head start. CSPs may be milling around at the bottom of Mount Automation, but the Web giants have already set up their base camps and are ready for the final climb to the summit. The race to the top may have already been lost.

  4. Investors are not going to be happy. The people who own shares of your company's stock don't like it when lots of money is spent with little or no immediate return. And automation will require a big up-front investment that's going to put more of a squeeze on margins for the next few years at least.

  5. You don't want to be a service animal for a machine. Even if you stick around long enough to see the job completed, the reward for spending years to build a self-driving network may likely be a trip to the unemployment -- or at least underemployment -- line. A truly autonomous network will be able to get by with a minimal number of human maintenance engineers.

So maybe CSPs that don't automate will end up in some virtual tar pit sometime in the late 2020s. It's been a good run. Maybe it's time to let somebody else worry about the future.

— Dennis Mendyk, SVP of Research, Heavy Reading

(20)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/27/2017 | 11:11:43 AM
Re: Watch out
Agree about when and not if regarding telecom automation. But the bigger question may be, who?
Phil_Britt
50%
50%
Phil_Britt,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/27/2017 | 8:16:06 AM
Re: Watch out
Even though "automation is hard" and may take longer than expected, it continues to become more pervasive throughout industries, not just telecom. So the question is "when" not "if."
Duh!
50%
50%
Duh!,
User Rank: Blogger
10/26/2017 | 11:14:59 AM
Re: Perverse disincentives
Opex reduction is a sure bet for the C-suite. If you take out some number of heads - loaded with health care, pensions (the unions haven't let go of those), OT, etc. plus strike risk - you know what it's going to do to your income and cash flow statements over the next few years.

If you create a new service, you're betting that its value proposition is as good as you think it is, that you've priced it right, that your competition isn't going to respond, that its margins will compensate for revenues lost by cannibalizing other services, and that your team is going to execute. If you're smart, you also factor in lots of confirmation bias on all the above.

Of course, you need some of both. But if your main objective is to keep raising the dividend to keep your share price up, which business case is going to be easier to buy into?
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/26/2017 | 10:41:54 AM
Re: Perverse disincentives
The walking off the bridge onto land part would be getting acquired by one of the Websters. Brought to you by AT&T, an Alphabet company.
Dissertationcorp
50%
50%
Dissertationcorp,
User Rank: Light Beer
10/26/2017 | 8:24:01 AM
Re: Perverse disincentives
This is really niuve we need help to make sure that we have some solutions in our life styles
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/26/2017 | 7:05:09 AM
Re: Perverse disincentives
Playing it safe by staying on a disintegrating bridge. It's nice to have a companion in stretching analogies to torturous limits. ;)

Taking it yet further: For all the hype of digital transformation tech as we know it presently, the real winners are going to be those who innovate yet a third option that is better than what we have now and renders it moot by just walking off the bridge safely to land -- leaving everyone else to their morbidly no-win choice.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/26/2017 | 6:54:09 AM
Re: Perverse disincentives
@Sterling: Excellent point/reminder -- and it reminds me of a corollary effect: That when you save your organization as a whole -- including other departments -- $X, then the leaders of those other departments may get credited for coming in under budget, while you as the innovating department leader stand to get reprimanded if your CAPEX is too high.

Or, as it is put much more succinctly: (link)
yarn
50%
50%
yarn,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/25/2017 | 4:33:08 PM
Re: Perverse disincentives
The same arguments are applied to ignore other difficult challegences such as climate change. The power of ignorence is strong as there are few issues that can't be ignored for a very long time. Many will just go away, but others exacerbate and become more costly to solve later. Without automation few people would be able to afford a car and there wouldn't be a case for building a national highway system, gas stations and massive oil production. But there would be less global warming...

Hm, perhaps there are 6 reasons to ignore autmation:-)
Sterling Perrin
50%
50%
Sterling Perrin,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/25/2017 | 2:06:11 PM
Re: Perverse disincentives
Brooks,

The other side of the NFV coin is something that generates revenue - then everybody seems to buy-in bc revenues increase and budgets increase. The CTL comments help explain why capex/opex saving use cases go nowhere but new revenue use cases move forward. There is a place for automation in revenue-generation use cases. In the report, we cite SD-WAN as a prime example of that.

Sterling
brooks7
50%
50%
brooks7,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/25/2017 | 2:05:57 PM
Re: Perverse disincentives
Duh!,

Easier said than done.  Reducing Opex does not mean that there is a project approved.  It means opex was reduced.  Here we are talking about something where one would think that whole departments will disapear over time.  Something more like:  Reduce operational headcount by 50% in 2 years.  People look up and ask...Will I have a job?

seven

 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from Heavy Lifting Analyst Notes
The Gfast rollout, which has been stalled while network operators conduct trials and chipset vendors develop new Amendment 3 chipsets, is set to start in 2018 with a ramp-up in 2019.
NFV is shifting from a technology focus to operations, as CSPs say too much effort has been spent on VNF onboarding and too little on the reality of operations.
The converged fiber access market is set to grow again, especially as copper lines continue to deteriorate.
The most recent Thought Leadership Council (TLC) survey finds that opportunities abound for 5G vendors as only 15% of TLC service providers have chosen their vendors for the 5G market.
The ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to carry out complex analysis on high volumes of data very quickly could help automate many telco security activities. But is it smart to cut humans out of the loop?
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders grills Cisco's Roland Acra on how he's bringing automation to life inside the data center.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
March 20-22, 2018, Denver Marriott Tech Center
March 22, 2018, Denver, Colorado | Denver Marriott Tech Center
March 28, 2018, Kansas City Convention Center
April 4, 2018, The Westin Dallas Downtown, Dallas
April 9, 2018, Las Vegas Convention Center
May 14-16, 2018, Austin Convention Center
September 25-27, 2018, Denver, Colorado
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
Net Neutrality Moves Are as Futile as Trump's Comb-Over
Iain Morris, News Editor, 1/18/2018
Samsung Plots New 5G Modem – Report
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 1/18/2018
Ericsson Lurches to $1.8B Write-Down
Iain Morris, News Editor, 1/16/2018
Analyst: Verizon's Fixed 5G Is a Loss Leader for Mobile
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 1/16/2018
Europe Urges US to Block Trump on Net Neutrality
Iain Morris, News Editor, 1/22/2018
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed